IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i9p331-d415446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acknowledging Indigenous and Local Knowledge to Facilitate Collaboration in Landscape Approaches—Lessons from a Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Portia Adade Williams

    (CSIR—Science and Technology Policy Research Institute, P.O. Box CT 519, Cantonments, Accra GA, Ghana)

  • Likho Sikutshwa

    (International Grants Hub, Research Office University of Cape Town Allan Cormack House, 2 Rhodes Avenue, Mowbray, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
    African Climate and Development Initiative and ARUA Centre of Excellence in Climate and Development, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7700, South Africa)

  • Sheona Shackleton

    (African Climate and Development Initiative and ARUA Centre of Excellence in Climate and Development, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7700, South Africa)

Abstract

The need to recognize diverse actors, their knowledge and values is being widely promoted as critical for sustainability in contemporary land use, natural resource management and conservation initiatives. However, in much of the case study literature, the value of including indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) in the management and governance of landscapes tends to be overlooked and undervalued. Understanding ILK as comprising indigenous, local and traditional knowledge, this systematic review synthesizes how ILK has been viewed and incorporated into landscape-based studies; what processes, mechanisms and areas of focus have been used to integrate it; and the challenges and opportunities that arise in doing so. Queries from bibliographic databases (Web of Science, JSTOR, Scopus and Africa Wide) were employed. Findings from the review underscore that the literature and case studies that link landscapes and ILK are dominated by a focus on agricultural systems, followed by social-ecological systems, indigenous governance, natural resource management, biodiversity conservation and climate change studies, especially those related to early warning systems for disaster risk reduction. The growing importance of multi-stakeholder collaborations in local landscape research and the promotion of inclusive consultations have helped to bring ILK to the fore in the knowledge development process. This, in turn, has helped to support improved landscape management, governance and planning for more resilient landscapes. However, more research is needed to explore ways to more effectively link ILK and scientific knowledge in landscape studies, particularly in the co-management of these social-ecological systems. More studies that confirm the usefulness of ILK, recognize multiple landscape values and their interaction with structures and policies dealing with landscape management and conservation are necessary for enhanced sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Portia Adade Williams & Likho Sikutshwa & Sheona Shackleton, 2020. "Acknowledging Indigenous and Local Knowledge to Facilitate Collaboration in Landscape Approaches—Lessons from a Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:9:p:331-:d:415446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/9/331/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/9/331/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qing-Xiong Ba & Dau-Jye Lu & Warren Hwa-Jen Kuo & Po-Hsin Lai, 2018. "Traditional Farming and Sustainable Development of an Indigenous Community in the Mountain Area—A Case Study of Wutai Village in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, September.
    2. John Bongaarts, 2019. "IPBES, 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(3), pages 680-681, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paulina G. Karimova & Kuang-Chung Lee, 2022. "An Integrated Landscape–Seascape Approach in the Making: Facilitating Multi-Stakeholder Partnership for Socio-Ecological Revitalisation in Eastern Coastal Taiwan (2016–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Diane Pearson & Julian Gorman, 2023. "Acknowledging Landscape Connection: Using Sense of Place and Cultural and Customary Landscape Management to Enhance Landscape Ecological Theoretical Frameworks," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Meg Parsons & Lara Taylor & Roa Crease, 2021. "Indigenous Environmental Justice within Marine Ecosystems: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Indigenous Peoples’ Involvement in Marine Governance and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-33, April.
    4. Thobani Cele & Maxwell Mudhara, 2024. "Impacts of Crop Production and Value Chains on Household Food Insecurity in Kwazulu-Natal: An Ordered Probit Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. D. Daniel & S. Satriani & Sefriyani Lea Zudi & Anjana Ekka, 2022. "To What Extent Does Indigenous Local Knowledge Support the Social–Ecological System? A Case Study of the Ammatoa Community, Indonesia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Nicola Favretto & Sheona Shackleton & Susannah M. Sallu & Tali Hoffman, 2021. "Editorial for Special Issue: “Collaboration and Multi-Stakeholder Engagement in Landscape Governance and Management in Africa: Lessons from Practice”," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-5, March.
    7. Shirvani Dastgerdi, Ahmadreza & Sargolini, Massimo & Broussard Allred, Shorna & Chatrchyan, Allison Morrill & Drescher, Michael & DeGeer, Christopher, 2022. "Climate change risk reduction in cultural landscapes: Insights from Cinque Terre and Waterloo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    8. Olgah Lerato Malapane & Walter Musakwa & Nelson Chanza & Verena Radinger-Peer, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Indigenous Knowledge from a Comparative African Perspective: 1990–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Ramūnas Povilanskas & Aistė Jurkienė & Inga Dailidienė & Raimonds Ernšteins & Alice Newton & María Esther Leyva Ollivier, 2024. "Circles of Coastal Sustainability and Emerald Growth Perspectives for Transitional Waters under Human Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huizhao Yang & Sailesh Ranjitkar & Deli Zhai & Micai Zhong & Stefanie Daniela Goldberg & Muhammad Asad Salim & Zhenghong Wang & Yi Jiang & Jianchu Xu, 2019. "Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Seasonal Calendars in the Context of Climate Change: A Case Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Ludovica Dessì & Lina Podda & Giuseppe Brundu & Vanessa Lozano & Antoine Carrouée & Elizabete Marchante & Hélia Marchante & Yohan Petit & Marco Porceddu & Gianluigi Bacchetta, 2021. "Seed Germination Ecophysiology of Acacia dealbata Link and Acacia mearnsii De Wild.: Two Invasive Species in the Mediterranean Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Marie Stenton & Veronika Kapsali & Richard S. Blackburn & Joseph A. Houghton, 2021. "From Clothing Rations to Fast Fashion: Utilising Regenerated Protein Fibres to Alleviate Pressures on Mass Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Qindong Fan & Fengtian Du & Hu Li, 2020. "A Study of the Spatial Form of Maling Village, Henan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Chenchen Ding & Yong Xia & Yang Su & Feng Li & Changjiang Xiong & Jingwen Xu, 2022. "Study on the Impact of Climate Change on China’s Import Trade of Major Agricultural Products and Adaptation Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Rosyi Damayanti T. Manningtyas & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Traditional Ecological Knowledge versus Ecological Wisdom: Are They Dissimilar in Cultural Landscape Research?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Wang, Jinsong & Gao, Dongdong & Shi, Wei & Du, Jiayan & Huang, Zhuo & Liu, Buyuan, 2023. "Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service value: Evidence from the economic development of urbanised regions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Alessio Ilari & Sara Fabrizi & Ester Foppa Pedretti, 2022. "European Hophornbeam Biomass for Energy Application: Influence of Different Production Processes and Heating Devices on Environmental Sustainability," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Sepide Mehrabi & Juan Carlos Perez-Mesa & Cynthia Giagnocavo, 2022. "The Role of Consumer-Citizens and Connectedness to Nature in the Sustainable Transition to Agroecological Food Systems: The Mediation of Innovative Business Models and a Multi-Level Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Mucahid Mustafa Bayrak & Yi-Ya Hsu & Li-San Hung & Huei-Min Tsai & tibusungu ‘e vayayana, 2020. "Global Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples in Taiwan: A Critical Bibliometric Analysis and Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, December.
    11. Meijing Chen & Zhongke Bai & Qingri Wang & Zeyu Shi, 2021. "Habitat Quality Effect and Driving Mechanism of Land Use Transitions: A Case Study of Henan Water Source Area of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Yi Huang & Li Peng & Yongchang Li, 2022. "Landscape Ecological Concepts in Planning (LEP): Progress, Hotspots, and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Martina Slámová & Ingrid Belčáková, 2019. "The Role of Small Farm Activities for the Sustainable Management of Agricultural Landscapes: Case Studies from Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Shalini Dhyani & Jayshree Shukla & Rakesh Kadaverugu & Rajarshi Dasgupta & Muktipada Panda & Sudip Kumar Kundu & Harini Santhanam & Paras R. Pujari & Pankaj Kumar & Shizuka Hashimoto, 2023. "Participatory Stakeholder Assessment for Drivers of Mangrove Loss to Prioritize Evidence-Based Conservation and Restoration in Bhitarkanika and Mahanadi Delta, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Bengochea Paz, Diego & Henderson, Kirsten & Loreau, Michel, 2020. "Agricultural land use and the sustainability of social-ecological systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    16. Fikret Berkes & Huei-Min Tsai & Mucahid Mustafa Bayrak & Yih-Ren Lin, 2021. "Indigenous Resilience to Disasters in Taiwan and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Irene Chrysafis & Georgios Korakis & Apostolos P. Kyriazopoulos & Giorgos Mallinis, 2020. "Predicting Tree Species Diversity Using Geodiversity and Sentinel-2 Multi-Seasonal Spectral Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, November.
    18. Heyang Gong & Zhibo Zhao & Lei Chang & Guanghui Li & Ying Li & Yuefen Li, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Patterns in and Key Influences on Cultivated-Land Multi-Functionality in Northeast China’s Black-Soil Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Lea Barbett & Edward J. N. Stupple & Michael Sweet & Malcolm B. Schofield & Miles Richardson, 2020. "Measuring Actions for Nature—Development and Validation of a Pro-Nature Conservation Behaviour Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Daniel Amoak & Isaac Luginaah & Gordon McBean, 2022. "Climate Change, Food Security, and Health: Harnessing Agroecology to Build Climate-Resilient Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:9:p:331-:d:415446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.