IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i8p262-d394852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entrepreneurs and Territorial Diversity: Success and Failure in Andalusia 2007–2015

Author

Listed:
  • Eugenio Cejudo García

    (Department of Human Geography, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • José Antonio Cañete Pérez

    (Department of Human Geography, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Francisco Navarro Valverde

    (Department of Human Geography, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Noelia Ruiz Moya

    (Department of Human Geography, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Rural Europe today cannot be understood without considering the impact of the EU’s Liaisons Entre Actions de Developpement de l’Economie Rurale (LEADER) rural development programme. Although in general it has had a positive impact, research has also revealed spatial and social disparities in the distribution of funds. Our primary source was the files for all the LEADER projects processed in Andalusia between 2007 and 2015. In addition to successfully executed projects, we also focused on “unfunded” projects, those in which, although promoters had initiated the application procedure, a grant was never ultimately obtained. Project failure must be studied so as to avoid biased findings. We then classified these projects within the different types of rural area and analysed the behaviour of the different promoters in these areas. Relevant findings include: project success or failure varies according to the different types of rural area, as does the behaviour of the different promoters; the degree of rurality can hinder project success; young and female entrepreneurs were more likely to fail; the type of promoter is strongly influenced by the distance to cities in that companies and Individual Entrepreneurs tend to invest in periurban spaces, while public sector promoters such as Local Councils are more prominent in remote rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugenio Cejudo García & José Antonio Cañete Pérez & Francisco Navarro Valverde & Noelia Ruiz Moya, 2020. "Entrepreneurs and Territorial Diversity: Success and Failure in Andalusia 2007–2015," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:8:p:262-:d:394852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/8/262/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/8/262/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Augustyn, Anna & Nemes, Gusztav, 2014. "Catching up with the West? Europeanising rural policies in Hungary and Poland," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 168921, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. de Cos Guerra, Olga & Reques Velasco , Pedro, 2019. "Vulnerabilidad territorial y demográfica en España. Posibilidades del análisis multicriterio y la lógica difusa para la definición de patrones espaciales," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 45, pages 201-225.
    3. Lopez, Hugo Sacristan & Arroyo, Francisco Martinez & Blanco, Jose Luis Yague, 2016. "Los órganos de decisión de los grupos de acción local en el periodo 2007-2013 en España: relaciones entre los actores del medio rural," Revista Espanola de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Rural y Marino (formerly Ministry of Agriculture), issue 245.
    4. Augustyn, Anna & Nemes, Gusztáv, 2014. "Catching up with the West? Europeanisation of policies in Hungary and Poland," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 116(3), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Milenko Fadic & José Enrique Garcilazo & Ana Moreno Monroy & Paolo Veneri, 2019. "Classifying small (TL3) regions based on metropolitan population, low density and remoteness," OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2019/06, OECD Publishing.
    6. Vicente Ruiz & Lewis Dijkstra, 2011. "Refinement of the OECD regional typology: Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1650, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Labianca, Marilena & De Rubertis, Stefano & Belliggiano, Angelo & Salento, Angelo, 2016. "Innovation in rural development in Puglia, Italy: critical issues and potentialities starting from empirical evidence," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(1), pages 1-9, April.
    8. Antonio López Ontiveros, 1994. "La agrociudad andaluza: Caracterización, estructura y problemática," Revista de Estudios Regionales, Universidades Públicas de Andalucía, vol. 2, pages 59-91.
    9. Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Ana Nieto Masot, 2017. "Towards Rural Sustainable Development? Contributions of the EAFRD 2007–2013 in Low Demographic Density Territories: The Case of Extremadura (SW Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Monica Brezzi & Lewis Dijkstra & Vicente Ruiz, 2011. "OECD Extended Regional Typology: The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions," OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2011/6, OECD Publishing.
    11. Artur da Rosa Pires & Martina Pertoldi & John Edwards & Fatime Barbara Hegyi, 2014. "Smart Specialisation and Innovation in Rural Areas," JRC Research Reports JRC90000, Joint Research Centre.
    12. Lewis Dijkstra & Enrique Garcilazo & Philip McCann, 2015. "The effects of the global financial crisis on European regions and cities," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(5), pages 935-949.
    13. José Antonio Cañete & Francisco Navarro & Eugenio Cejudo, 2018. "Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain)," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 726-744, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wan Li & Bindong Sun & Shuaishuai Han & Xiaoxi Jin, 2023. "Does Urban Agglomeration Discourage Entrepreneurship in China? Micro-Empirical Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Eugenio Cejudo-García & Francisco Navarro-Valverde & José Antonio Cañete-Pérez, 2022. "Who Decides and Who Invests? The Role of the Public, Private and Third Sectors in Rural Development according to Geographical Contexts: The LEADER Approach in Andalusia, 2007–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Counterbalancing the Development Territorial Disparities in the Implementation of the Community-Led Local Development EU Approach in Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eugenio Cejudo-García & Francisco Navarro-Valverde & José Antonio Cañete-Pérez, 2022. "Who Decides and Who Invests? The Role of the Public, Private and Third Sectors in Rural Development according to Geographical Contexts: The LEADER Approach in Andalusia, 2007–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Ana Nieto Masot, 2022. "Mapping the Optimal Rural Areas to Invest in through the LEADER Approach: Case Study—Extremadura (SW Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Francisco J. Goerlich & Ernest Reig & Isidro Cantarino, 2016. "Delimitación y características de las áreas rurales en los municipios y las provincias españolas," Working Papers 1606, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    4. Ángela Engelmo Moriche & Ana Nieto Masot & Julián Mora Aliseda, 2021. "Economic Sustainability of Touristic Offer Funded by Public Initiatives in Spanish Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Martin Thomas Falk & Eva Hagsten & Xiang Lin, 2022. "Domestic tourism demand in the North and the South of Europe in the Covid-19 summer of 2020," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(2), pages 537-553, October.
    6. Francisco José Goerlich Gisbert & Isidro Cantarino Martí, 2013. "Redefiniendo ciudades," Working Papers. Serie EC 2013-06, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    7. Mieczysław Adamowicz, 2021. "The Potential for Innovative and Smart Rural Development in the Peripheral Regions of Eastern Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, February.
    8. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Paolo Veneri & Vicente Ruiz, 2016. "Urban-To-Rural Population Growth Linkages: Evidence From Oecd Tl3 Regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 3-24, January.
    10. Navarro Francisco & Labianca Marilena & Cejudo Eugenio & de Rubertis Stefano & Salento Angelo & Maroto Juan Carlos & Belliggiano Angelo, 2018. "Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 107-126, March.
    11. Patrícia C. Melo & Conceição Rego & Paulo R. Anciães & Nuno Guiomar & José Muñoz‐Rojas, 2022. "Does road accessibility to cities support rural population growth? Evidence for Portugal between 1991 and 2011," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 443-470, March.
    12. Klimanek Tomasz & Filas-Przybył Sylwia, 2019. "The Impact Of The Applied Typology On The Statistical Picture Of Population Ageing In Urban Areas In Poland – A Comparative Analysis," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 20(4), pages 135-152, December.
    13. Braga Gustavo Bastos & de Carvalho Fiúza Ana Louise & Remoaldo Paula Cristina, 2018. "Eurostat methodology applied to the characterization of rural and urban Brazilian spaces," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 42(42), pages 151-162, December.
    14. Carmen Delgado-Viñas & María-Luisa Gómez-Moreno, 2022. "The Interaction between Urban and Rural Areas: An Updated Paradigmatic, Methodological and Bibliographic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Enabling Factors for Better Multiplier Effects of the LEADER Programme: Lessons from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Chris McDonald & Lorena Figueiredo, 2022. "A Framework for Comparative Assessment of Indigenous Land Governance," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Francesco Mantino & Giovanna De Fano & Gianluca Asaro, 2022. "Analysing the Policy Delivery System and Effects on Territorial Disparities in Italy: The Mechanisms of Territorial Targeting in the EU Rural Development Programmes 2014–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, October.
    18. Martin Falk & Eva Hagsten & Xiang Lin, 2023. "Uneven domestic tourism demand in times of pandemic," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(3), pages 596-611, May.
    19. Ognjen Žurovec & Sabrija Čadro & Bishal Kumar Sitaula, 2017. "Quantitative Assessment of Vulnerability to Climate Change in Rural Municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Klimanek Tomasz & Filas-Przybył Sylwia, 2020. "The statistical picture of population aging in towns of Wielkopolskie Province: TERYT and DEGURBA perspectives," Journal of Economics and Management, Sciendo, vol. 39(1), pages 41-61, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:8:p:262-:d:394852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.