IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p504-d1602370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Intra-Urban Innovation Space from the Unit-Network Perspective: A Case Study of Guangzhou

Author

Listed:
  • Gang Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
    Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Qifeng Yuan

    (State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Xiao Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
    Department of Architecture, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore)

  • Wei Zhan

    (State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Shuya Yang

    (State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
    Department of Architecture and Design, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

Three spatial turns have occurred in innovation research, including focuses on regional, urban, and intra-urban scales. The primary focus of this study was to determine the spatial distribution of innovation and the innovation networks within urban areas based on a unit-network analytical framework. ArcGIS Pro was applied to identify innovation space units and to build a collaboration matrix among these units. Subsequently, Gephi 0.9.2 was used to analyse the networks. Guangzhou was used as a case study for empirical analysis, and the main conclusions are as follows. Guangzhou contains 53 innovation space units covering 495 grids and an area of 123.75 km 2 (1.67% of the land area). The 53 innovation space units encompass 231,698 patents, accounting for 72.28% of the total patents in Guangzhou. The 53 innovation space units can be categorised into three levels—innovation agglomeration zones (IAZs), innovation agglomeration sub-zones (IASZs), and innovation agglomeration nodes (IANs)—which can be further classified into nine types. The spatial distribution of innovation and the innovation networks in Guangzhou form a core–periphery structure, with the Wushan–Shipai Science and Education Innovation Zone, Tianhe Centre–Yuexiu East CBD Zone, and Guangzhou Science Town Innovation Zone forming three poles at the core. The weighted degree centrality of the three poles ranked among the top 3 of the 53 innovation space units, and the link frequency between poles was among the top 3 in the 143 pairs of connections between the 53 innovation spatial units.

Suggested Citation

  • Gang Li & Qifeng Yuan & Xiao Liu & Wei Zhan & Shuya Yang, 2025. "Measuring Intra-Urban Innovation Space from the Unit-Network Perspective: A Case Study of Guangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:504-:d:1602370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:504-:d:1602370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.