IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1515-d1480627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotional Perceptions of Thermal Comfort for People Exposed to Green Spaces Characterized Using Streetscapes in Urban Parks

Author

Listed:
  • Benlu Xin

    (School of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
    “Lce and Snow Tourism Resorts Equipment and Intelligent Service Technology” Ministry of Culture and Tourism Key Laboratory, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Chengfeng Zhu

    (School of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
    “Lce and Snow Tourism Resorts Equipment and Intelligent Service Technology” Ministry of Culture and Tourism Key Laboratory, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Jingjing Geng

    (School of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
    “Lce and Snow Tourism Resorts Equipment and Intelligent Service Technology” Ministry of Culture and Tourism Key Laboratory, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Yanqi Liu

    (School of Business Administration, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China)

Abstract

Thermal comfort is a key determinant ruling the quality of urban park visits that is mainly evaluated by equivalent meteorological factors and lacks evidence about its relationship with emotional perception. Exposure to green space was believed to be an available approach to increase thermal comfort, but this argument still needs verification to confirm its reliability. In this study, about ~15,000 streetscapes were photographed at stops along sidewalks and evaluated for green view index (GVI) and plant diversity index in five urban parks of Changchun, Northeast China. The faces of visitors were captured to analyze happy, sad, and neutral scores as well as two net positive emotion estimates. Meteorological factors of temperature, relative humidity, and wind velocity were measured at the same time for evaluating thermal comfort using equivalent variables of discomfort index ( DI ), temperature and humidity index ( THI ), and cooling power index ( CP ). At stops with higher GVI, lower temperature (slope: from −0.1058 to −0.0871) and wind velocity (slope: from −0.1273 to −0.0524) were found, as well as higher relative humidity (slope: from 0.0871 to 0.8812), which resulted in positive relationships between GVI and thermal comfort evaluated as DI ( R 2 = 0.3598, p < 0.0001) or CP ( R 2 = 0.3179, p < 0.0001). Sad score was positively correlated with THI ( R 2 = 0.0908, p = 0.0332) and negatively correlated with CP ( R 2 = 0.0929, p = 0.0294). At stops with high GVI, more positive emotions were shown on visitors’ faces (happy minus sad scores, 0.31 ± 0.10). Plant diversity had varied relationships with GVI in parks depending on age. Overall, our study demonstrated that using imagery data extracted from streetscapes can be useful for evaluating thermal comfort. It is recommended to plan a large amount of touchable nature provided by vegetation in urban parks so as to mitigate micro-climates towards a trend with more thermal comfort that evokes more positive emotions.

Suggested Citation

  • Benlu Xin & Chengfeng Zhu & Jingjing Geng & Yanqi Liu, 2024. "Emotional Perceptions of Thermal Comfort for People Exposed to Green Spaces Characterized Using Streetscapes in Urban Parks," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1515-:d:1480627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1515/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1515/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Hongxu & Hauer, Richard J. & He, Xingyuan, 2021. "A forest experience does not always evoke positive emotion: A pilot study on unconscious facial expressions using the face reading technology," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Xiaojiang Li, 2021. "Examining the spatial distribution and temporal change of the green view index in New York City using Google Street View images and deep learning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 2039-2054, September.
    3. Li, Hailong & Campana, Pietro Elia & Tan, Yuting & Yan, Jinyue, 2018. "Feasibility study about using a stand-alone wind power driven heat pump for space heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1486-1498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Zhong, Xiaohui & Chen, Tao & Sun, Xiangyu & Song, Juanjuan & Zeng, Jiajun, 2022. "Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of a novel wind-to-heat system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    3. Wu, Chenyu & Gu, Wei & Xu, Yinliang & Jiang, Ping & Lu, Shuai & Zhao, Bo, 2018. "Bi-level optimization model for integrated energy system considering the thermal comfort of heat customers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 607-616.
    4. Rafał Figaj & Maciej Żołądek & Wojciech Goryl, 2020. "Dynamic Simulation and Energy Economic Analysis of a Household Hybrid Ground-Solar-Wind System Using TRNSYS Software," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Yuan, Qiheng & Zhou, Keliang & Yao, Jing, 2020. "A new measure of wind power variability with implications for the optimal sizing of standalone wind power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 538-549.
    6. Dandan Wang & Hyun Min & Donggen Rui, 2024. "Intentional Characteristics and Public Perceived Preferences of Lake Parks Based on Machine Learning Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Kong, Decheng & Wang, Yunfeng & Li, Ming & Liang, Jingkang, 2022. "Experimental investigation of a novel hybrid drying system powered by a solar photovoltaic/thermal air collector and wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 705-718.
    8. Gabriele Stancato, 2024. "The Visual Greenery Field: Representing the Urban Green Visual Continuum with Street View Image Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-29, October.
    9. Yu Sun & Xintong Ma & Yifeng Liu & Lingquan Meng, 2023. "Salary Satisfaction of Employees at Workplace on a Large Area of Planted Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Cao, Karl-Kiên & Nitto, Alejandro Nicolás & Sperber, Evelyn & Thess, André, 2018. "Expanding the horizons of power-to-heat: Cost assessment for new space heating concepts with Wind Powered Thermal Energy Systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 925-936.
    11. Carlo Roselli & Maurizio Sasso & Francesco Tariello, 2020. "A Wind Electric-Driven Combined Heating, Cooling, and Electricity System for an Office Building in Two Italian Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Fei Yu & Jianfeng Deng & Xiaogang Ding & Hongyan Ma, 2022. "Interpolated Stand Properties of Urban Forest Parks Account for Posted Facial Expressions of Visitors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Lamidi, Rasaq. O. & Jiang, L. & Pathare, Pankaj B. & Wang, Y.D. & Roskilly, A.P., 2019. "Recent advances in sustainable drying of agricultural produce: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 367-385.
    14. Ma, Tengfei & Pei, Wei & Deng, Wei & Xiao, Hao & Yang, Yanhong & Tang, Chenghong, 2022. "A Nash bargaining-based cooperative planning and operation method for wind-hydrogen-heat multi-agent energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    15. Marek Franěk & Jan Petružálek, 2021. "Viewing Natural vs. Urban Images and Emotional Facial Expressions: An Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-10, July.
    16. Lan Wang & Changwei Zhou, 2024. "Evaluation of Perceptions Using Facial Expression Scores on Ecological Service Value of Blue and Green Spaces in 61 Parks in Guizhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Maciej Żołądek & Alexandros Kafetzis & Rafał Figaj & Kyriakos Panopoulos, 2022. "Energy-Economic Assessment of Islanded Microgrid with Wind Turbine, Photovoltaic Field, Wood Gasifier, Battery, and Hydrogen Energy Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Maryori C. Díaz-Ramírez & Víctor J. Ferreira & Tatiana García-Armingol & Ana María López-Sabirón & Germán Ferreira, 2020. "Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Bartłomiej Ciapała & Jakub Jurasz & Alexander Kies, 2019. "The Potential of Wind Power-Supported Geothermal District Heating Systems—Model Results for a Location in Warsaw (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Sun, X.Y. & Zhong, X.H. & Zhang, M.Y. & Zhou, T., 2022. "Experimental investigation on a novel wind-to-heat system with high efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1515-:d:1480627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.