IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i1p57-d1312405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intentional Characteristics and Public Perceived Preferences of Lake Parks Based on Machine Learning Models

Author

Listed:
  • Dandan Wang

    (Department of Global and Area Studies, Pukyong National University, 45, Yongso-ro, Nam-gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyun Min

    (Department of Global and Area Studies, Pukyong National University, 45, Yongso-ro, Nam-gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea)

  • Donggen Rui

    (Department of Global and Area Studies, Pukyong National University, 45, Yongso-ro, Nam-gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze and understand the perceived landscape preferences of lake parks (LPs) and how the public perceives and prefers these elements within the context of lake parks. The objective was to provide insights beneficial for landscape design, urban planning, and the creation of more appealing and sustainable lake parks. To achieve this, two primary methods were employed in this study: the Automated Machine Learning (Auto ML) model and the DeepLab v3+ model. To gather data for the research, 46,444 images were collected from 20 different lake parks from 2019 to 2022. Social media platforms such as Instagram, Flickr, and specific lake park community groups were tapped to source photographs from both professional photographers and the general public. According to the experimental findings, the perceived frequency of natural landscapes was 69.27%, which was higher than that of humanistic landscapes by 30.73%. The perceived intensity was also maintained between 0.09 and 0.25. The perceived frequency of water body landscapes was much greater on a macro-scale, at 73.02%, and the public had various plant preferences throughout the year. Aquatic plant landscapes with low-to-medium green visibility were preferred by the public, according to the landscape share characterization, while amusement rides with medium-to-high openness were preferred. The sky visibility of amusement rides was between 0 and 0.1 and between 0.3 and 0.5, indicating that the public preferred amusement rides with medium-to-high openness. In lake parks, the populace chose settings with less obvious architectural features. When combined, the two models used in this study are useful for identifying and analyzing the intended traits and preferences of lake parks among the general public. They also have theoretical and practical application value for directing the development of lake parks and urban landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Dandan Wang & Hyun Min & Donggen Rui, 2024. "Intentional Characteristics and Public Perceived Preferences of Lake Parks Based on Machine Learning Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:57-:d:1312405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/1/57/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/1/57/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaojiang Li, 2021. "Examining the spatial distribution and temporal change of the green view index in New York City using Google Street View images and deep learning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 2039-2054, September.
    2. Maria Sinou & Katerina Skalkou & Roumpini Perakaki & Sébastien Jacques & Zoe Kanetaki, 2023. "Holistic Strategies Based on Heritage, Environmental, Sensory Analysis and Mapping for Sustainable Coastal Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mengyao Wang & Yu Yan & Mingxuan Li & Long Zhou, 2024. "Differences in Emotional Preferences toward Urban Green Spaces among Various Cultural Groups in Macau and Their Influencing Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:57-:d:1312405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.