IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1395-d1467521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territorial Spatial Resilience Assessment and Its Optimisation Path: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaxing Cui

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation, Academy of Wuhan Metropolitan Area, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Han Jin

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation, Academy of Wuhan Metropolitan Area, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Xuesong Kong

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Jianwei Sun

    (School of Geographical and Environmental Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Yawen Peng

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation, Academy of Wuhan Metropolitan Area, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yuanyuan Zhu

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation, Academy of Wuhan Metropolitan Area, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Along with the rapid development of urbanization and industrialization, the carrying capacity of territorial space has been confronted with a serious crisis. Faced with many uncertain risks and unknown disruptions, it is important to proactively address the uncertainty of future developments in planning and to improve territorial spatial resilience (TSR). Based on the connotation of TSR, we build an assessment framework for TSR containing urban, agricultural and ecological space from three dimensions, including element, structure and function. Using a variety of methods such as the source-sink landscape index, land suitability assessment, and cropland pressure index, we assessed the TSR of the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) from 2000 to 2020 and comprehensively analysed its spatial and temporal evolutionary characteristics. Through data analysis, we observe that the urban spatial resilience (RU) decreases and then increases, while the agricultural spatial resilience (RA) and the ecological spatial resilience (RE) show an increasing trend. The spatial clustering in TSR is apparent, and the distribution of hot and cold spots in RA and RE is reversed in the east–west direction. The changes in TSR are influenced by a combination of RU, RA and RE, which show unique geographical characteristics. Based on the average level and overall evolution of TSR, we divided the study area into five type zones and proposed development strategies for each of them.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaxing Cui & Han Jin & Xuesong Kong & Jianwei Sun & Yawen Peng & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2024. "Territorial Spatial Resilience Assessment and Its Optimisation Path: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1395-:d:1467521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1395/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1395/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mengjie Zhang & Chong Peng & Jianfeng Shu & Yingzi Lin, 2022. "Territorial Resilience of Metropolitan Regions: A Conceptual Framework, Recognition Methodologies and Planning Response—A Case Study of Wuhan Metropolitan Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Angelo Jonas Imperiale & Frank Vanclay, 2021. "Conceptualizing community resilience and the social dimensions of risk to overcome barriers to disaster risk reduction and sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 891-905, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inés Álvarez-Melcón & Raffaele Sisto & Álvaro de Juanes Rodríguez & David Pereira, 2024. "Integrating the SDGs into Urban Regeneration: A Madrid Nuevo Norte Case Study Using an Adapted Voluntary Local Review Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-30, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongyi Chen & Yanzhong Liu & Lin Hu & Zuo Zhang & Yong Chen & Yuchuan Tan & Yufei Han, 2022. "Constructing a Flood-Adaptive Ecological Security Pattern from the Perspective of Ecological Resilience: A Case Study of the Main Urban Area in Wuhan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Vanda Ningrum & Chotib & Athor Subroto, 2022. "Urban Community Resilience Amidst the Spreading of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A Rapid Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Eriko Miyama, 2023. "Regional Agriculture and Social Capital after Massive Natural Disasters: The Case of Miyagi Prefecture after the Great East Japan Earthquake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Albert Sanghoon Park, 2023. "Building resilience knowledge for sustainable development: Insights from development studies," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2023-33, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Louis Nyahunda & Livhuwani David Nemakonde & Sizwile Khoza, 2024. "Exploring the determinants of disaster and climate resilience building in Zimbabwe’s rural communities," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(11), pages 10273-10291, September.
    6. Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter & Banica, Alexandru, 2023. "An analysis of natural disasters’ effects – A global comparative study of ‘Blessing in Disguise’," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Hongbo Sun & Fangjing Song & Xin Ai & Yushan Duan, 2024. "Content Analysis of Disaster Risk Reduction in Secondary School Geography Textbooks in China and the United States: Promoting Disaster Resilience through Geography Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Xu, Hongzhang & Pittock, Jamie & Daniell, Katherine, 2022. "‘Sustainability of what, for whom? A critical analysis of Chinese development induced displacement and resettlement (DIDR) programs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Broome, James David & Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur, 2024. "Heavenly lights: An exploratory review of auroral ecosystem services and disservices," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Qian Gong & Yushan Duan & Fengtao Guo, 2021. "Disaster Risk Reduction Education in School Geography Curriculum: Review and Outlook from a Perspective of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Xie, Chengyuan & Huang, Lu, 2024. "How to drive sustainable economic development: The role of fintech, natural resources, and social vulnerability," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Yunjia Ma & Sijia Chen & Kaiwen Zhang & Yumeng Yang, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Pattern Evolution and Influencing Factors of the National Comprehensive Disaster-Reduction Demonstration Community in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Ali AlGahtani & Naill Al Momani & Amanda Jane Davies & Edris Alam, 2022. "Identifying Demographic, Social and Professional Characteristics for Effective Disaster Risk Management—A Case Study of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Peter Ferguson & Linda Wollersheim, 2023. "From sustainable development to resilience? (Dis)continuities in climate and development policy governance discourse," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 67-77, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1395-:d:1467521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.