IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i5p1008-d1139016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification and Analysis of Territorial Spatial Utilization Conflicts in Yibin Based on Multidimensional Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Bao Meng

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Yibin University, Yibin 644000, China)

  • Shaoyao Zhang

    (The Faculty Geography Resource Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China
    Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Wei Deng

    (The Faculty Geography Resource Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

  • Li Peng

    (The Faculty Geography Resource Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

  • Peng Zhou

    (School of Politics, Law&Public Administration, Yanan University, Yanan 716000, China)

  • Hao Zhang

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China)

Abstract

The measurement of territorial spatial conflict degrees and the identification of conflict areas are important issues in the field of regional development planning. The scientific and comprehensive recognition and measurement of territorial spatial utilization conflicts, from a multidimensional perspective, are significant for the optimization of reasonable land use and the realization of sustainable spatial development in various regions. In this study, the territorial spatial development and utilization conflicts in Yibin were measured and analyzed in terms of the development intensity, landscape pattern index, and spatial suitability from a multidimensional perspective of the “upper limit-structure-bottom line” perspective of territorial spaces. Certain corresponding development strategies were proposed, and some major conclusions could be drawn: (1) In terms of the development intensity, the developable intensity value for most townships in Yibin is lower than the minimum developable intensity value, indicating their fine development potential in the future. However, the current development intensity of a few townships is higher than the maximum developable intensity value. These townships can be divided into topographic restricted zones, urban concentrated zones, and natural reserves. (2) In terms of landscape conflict, areas with mild, moderate, and severe conflict in the southern region of Yibin decreased significantly from 1990 to 2018, and severe conflict areas in the middle and northern regions decreased; however, moderate and mild conflict areas increased. Potential ecological conflict risks to the landscape cannot be ignored. (3) For spatial suitability, urban spatial conflict areas, agricultural spatial conflict areas, urban–ecological spatial conflict areas, and agricultural–ecological spatial conflict areas were recognized according to a comparison of the utilization status and suitability assessment results. (4) According to estimation results of three types of conflicts, townships in Yibin were divided into eight types of conflicts: (1) conflict caused by improper urban planning to squeeze ecological spaces and replace agricultural spaces; (2) conflict caused by extensive and disordered agricultural development; (3) conflict controlled by the squeezing of ecological spaces; (4) conflict controlled by the encroachment of ecological spaces; (5) conflict caused by backward urbanization; (6) conflict caused by low-level agricultural development; (7) conflict caused by overall development hysteresis; and (8) conflict caused by a shortage of development space. This study has some theoretical and practical implications for a comprehensive understanding of territorial spatial development patterns and their degrees, the scientific recognition and trade-off of multidimensional territorial spatial utilization conflicts, and realizing sustainable development in certain regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bao Meng & Shaoyao Zhang & Wei Deng & Li Peng & Peng Zhou & Hao Zhang, 2023. "Identification and Analysis of Territorial Spatial Utilization Conflicts in Yibin Based on Multidimensional Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1008-:d:1139016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1008/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1008/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Chao & Xu, Yueqing & Lu, Xinhai & Han, Jing, 2021. "Trade-offs and driving forces of land use functions in ecologically fragile areas of northern Hebei Province: Spatiotemporal analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Furui Xi & Runping Wang & Jusong Shi & Jinde Zhang & Yang Yu & Na Wang & Zhiyi Wang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Conflict Identification of Production–Living–Ecological Space in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Ahani, Somayeh, 2019. "Land tenure-related conflicts in peri-urban areas: A review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 218-229.
    4. Pengnan Xiao & Jie Xu & Chong Zhao, 2022. "Conflict Identification and Zoning Optimization of “Production-Living-Ecological” Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Chenglong Cao & Dongwei Zhang, 2020. "Spatial Conflict of Production–Living–Ecological Space and Sustainable-Development Scenario Simulation in Yangtze River Delta Agglomerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-11, March.
    6. Niu, Hebin & Wang, Jinman & Jing, Zhaorui & Liu, Biao, 2023. "Identification and management of land use conflicts in mining cities: A case study of Shuozhou in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Alexander Khoroshev, 2020. "Landscape-Ecological Approach to Spatial Planning as a Tool to Minimize Socio-Ecological Conflicts: Case Study of Agrolandscape in the Taiga Zone of Russia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Li, Sinan & Zhao, Xiaoqing & Pu, Junwei & Miao, Peipei & Wang, Qian & Tan, Kun, 2021. "Optimize and control territorial spatial functional areas to improve the ecological stability and total environment in karst areas of Southwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    9. Guanglong Dong & Yibing Ge & Haiwei Jia & Chuanzhun Sun & Senyuan Pan, 2021. "Land Use Multi-Suitability, Land Resource Scarcity and Diversity of Human Needs: A New Framework for Land Use Conflict Identification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junxiong Mo & Piling Sun & Dandan Shen & Nan Li & Jinye Zhang & Kun Wang, 2023. "Simulation Analysis of Land-Use Spatial Conflict in a Geopark Based on the GMOP–Markov–PLUS Model: A Case Study of Yimengshan Geopark, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Ling Cheng & Haiyang Cui & Tian Liang & Dan Huang & Yuanxia Su & Zhiyong Zhang & Chuanhao Wen, 2023. "Study on the Trade-Off Synergy Relationship of “Production-Living-Ecological” Functions in Chinese Counties: A Case Study of Chongqing Municipality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Yi Zhao, 2022. "A Review on the Overall Optimization of Production–Living–Ecological Space: Theoretical Basis and Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Tian Liang & Peng Du & Fei Yang & Yuanxia Su & Yinchen Luo & You Wu & Chuanhao Wen, 2022. "Potential Land-Use Conflicts in the Urban Center of Chongqing Based on the “Production–Living–Ecological Space” Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Yu Chen & Shuangshuang Liu & Wenbo Ma & Qian Zhou, 2023. "Assessment of the Carrying Capacity and Suitability of Spatial Resources and the Environment and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Zhang, Jing & Li, Sinan & Lin, Naifa & Lin, Yue & Yuan, Shaofeng & Zhang, Ling & Zhu, Jinxia & Wang, Ke & Gan, Muye & Zhu, Congmou, 2022. "Spatial identification and trade-off analysis of land use functions improve spatial zoning management in rapid urbanized areas, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Guanglong Dong & Jue Wang & Wenxin Zhang & Zheng Liu & Kehua Wang & Weiya Cheng, 2023. "Land Use Conflict Identification Coupled with Ecological Protection Priority in Jinan City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Shuang Lu & Zibo Zhou & Mingyang Houding & Liu Yang & Qiang Gao & Chenglong Cao & Xiang Li & Ziqiang Bu, 2023. "Study into the Evolution of Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Production–Living–Ecological Spaces on the Indochina Peninsula," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Guoliang Xu & Xiaonan Yin & Guangdong Wu & Ning Gao, 2022. "Rethinking the Contribution of Land Element to Urban Economic Growth: Evidence from 30 Provinces in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Yunlu Jiang & Haotian He & Haoyu Zhang & Yuee Cao & Ge Shi & Lin Feng & Jianjun Yang, 2023. "Study on the Evolution and Optimization of the Spatial Structure of the Oasis in the Arid Area: A Case Study of the Aksu River Basin in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Tianjiao Zhang & Cuifang Zhang & Qian Wang & Chuanhao Yang & Jin Zhang & Chenxuan Zhang & Qipeng Zhang, 2024. "Research on Sustainable Land Use in Alpine Meadow Region Based on Coupled Coordination Degree Model—From Production–Living–Ecology Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Mengqi Xue & Hongwei Wang & Yiming Wei & Chen Ma & Yucong Yin, 2022. "Spatial Characteristics of Land Use Multifunctionality and Their Trade-Off/Synergy in Urumqi, China: Implication for Land Space Zoning Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Yang Zheng & Linlin Cheng & Yifang Wang, 2022. "Measuring the Spatial Conflict of Resource-Based Cities and Its Coupling Coordination Relationship with Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Onyebueke, Victor & Walker, Julian & Lipietz, Barbara & Ujah, Oliver & Ibezim-Ohaeri, Victoria, 2020. "Urbanisation-induced displacements in peri-urban areas: Clashes between customary tenure and statutory practices in Ugbo-Okonkwo Community in Enugu, Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Jiaxing Cui & Xuesong Kong & Jing Chen & Jianwei Sun & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2021. "Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Yuxin Ren & Xiaotong Feng & Kun Ma & Wen Zhai & Jihong Dong, 2023. "Precise Identification of Site Characteristics and Risk Management of Ningdong Coal Power Base," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Kleemann, Janina & Struve, Berenike & Spyra, Marcin, 2023. "Conflicts in urban peripheries in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    18. Xiaofang Sun & Chao Yu & Junbang Wang & Meng Wang, 2020. "The Intensity Analysis of Production Living Ecological Land in Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Zhang, Zuo & Li, Jiaming, 2022. "Spatial suitability and multi-scenarios for land use: Simulation and policy insights from the production-living-ecological perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Wancong Li & Hong Li & Shijun Wang & Zhiqiang Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of County-Level Land Use Structure in the Context of Urban Shrinkage: Evidence from Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1008-:d:1139016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.