IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i8p1304-d1458320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Equitable Representations of Ageing: Evaluation of Gender, Territories, Aids and Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Zorrilla-Muñoz

    (Bioengineering Institute, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, 03202 Alicante, Spain
    University Institute on Gender Studies, University Carlos III of Madrid, Getafe, 28903 Madrid, Spain)

  • Daniela Luz Moyano

    (University Institute on Gender Studies, University Carlos III of Madrid, Getafe, 28903 Madrid, Spain
    Health Science Department, National University of La Matanza, San Justo, Buenos Aires B1714, Argentina)

  • Carolina Marcos Carvajal

    (Social Analysis Department, University Carlos III of Madrid, Getafe, 28903 Madrid, Spain)

  • María Silveria Agulló-Tomás

    (University Institute on Gender Studies, University Carlos III of Madrid, Getafe, 28903 Madrid, Spain
    Social Analysis Department, University Carlos III of Madrid, Getafe, 28903 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

There are few studies on the representation of older people regarding aids and assistive devices and even fewer that incorporate more inclusive views (gender, emotions, anti-ageist, territorial or land approach) as well as virtual or land ethnography or artificial intelligence. The general objective was to evaluate digital images of aids and assistive aids in the older population, from the perspectives mentioned above. Method. A descriptive and cross-sectional study that searched, observed and analyzed images. An evaluation of intentionally selected images from Freepik, Pixabay, Storyblocks, Splitshire, Gratisography and ArtGPT, included in an original database constructured by several authors of this article, was carried out in the context of the ENCAGEn-CM project (2020–2023, financed by the CAM and FSE). This base was updated and expanded in October and November 2023. In addition, an image generation process was carried out using artificial intelligence, and this was also part of the analysis (ArtGPT). Finally, algorithms were used to solve and retrain with the images. Results. Of the total final images included in the expanded database until November 2023 (n = 427), only a third (28.3%, 121/427) included the aids and assistive aids label. Representations of mixed groups predominated (38.8%) and, to a lesser extent, those of women. A large proportion of the devices were ‘glasses’ (74.6%) and the ‘use of a cane’ (14.9%). To a lesser extent, ‘wheelchairs’ (4.4%) or ‘hearing aids’ (0.9%) and the presence of more than one device (simultaneously) (5.3%) were noted. The main emotions represented were ‘joy’ (45.6%) and ‘emotion not recognized’ (45.6%), with, to a lesser extent, ‘sadness’ (3.5%), ‘surprise’ (4.4%) and ‘anger’ (0.9%). Differences by sex were found in the represented emotions linked to aids and assistive aids. The representation of images of the built environment predominated significantly (70.2%), and it was observed that older women were less represented in natural environments than men. Based on the previous findings, a method is proposed to address stereotypes in images of older individuals. It involves identifying common stereotypical features, like glasses and hospital settings, using deep learning and quantum computing techniques. A convolutional neural network identifies and suppresses these elements, followed by the use of quantum algorithms to manipulate features. This systematic approach aims to mitigate biases and enhance the accuracy in representing older people in digital imagery. Conclusion. A limited proportion of images of assistive devices and older people were observed. Furthermore, among them, the lower representation of images of women in a built environment was confirmed, and the expressions of emotions were limited to only three basic ones (joy, sadness and surprise). In these evaluated digital images, the collective imagination of older people continues to be limited to a few spaces/contexts and emotions and is stereotyped regarding the same variables (sex, age, environment). Technology often overlooks innovative support tools for older adults, and AI struggles in accurately depicting emotions and environments in digital images. There is a pressing need for thorough pretraining analysis and ethical considerations to address these challenges and ensure more accurate and inclusive representations of older persons in digital media.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Zorrilla-Muñoz & Daniela Luz Moyano & Carolina Marcos Carvajal & María Silveria Agulló-Tomás, 2024. "Towards Equitable Representations of Ageing: Evaluation of Gender, Territories, Aids and Artificial Intelligence," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1304-:d:1458320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1304/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1304/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taipale, Sakari & Oinas, Tomi & Karhinen, Joonas, 2021. "Heterogeneity of traditional and digital media use among older adults: A six-country comparison," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Young-Jae Kim & Chanam Lee, 2020. "Built and Natural Environmental Correlates of Parental Safety Concerns for Children’s Active Travel to School," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Jingjing Zhang & Xiaoting Liu, 2021. "Media representation of older people’s vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic in China," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 149-158, June.
    4. María Sánchez-Román & Gadea Autric-Tamayo & Gloria Fernandez-Mayoralas & Fermina Rojo-Perez & María Silveria Agulló-Tomás & Diego Sánchez-González & Vicente Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 2022. "Social Image of Old Age, Gendered Ageism and Inclusive Places: Older People in the Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-26, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamza Umer, 2023. "Stability of pro-sociality and trust amid the Covid-19: panel data from the Netherlands," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 255-287, February.
    2. Ivana Olecká & Ludmila Trochtová & Jiří Pospíšil & Helena Pospíšilová, 2022. "Social Networking as Leisure: An Attempt to Conceptualize Liquid Leisure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    3. María Sánchez-Román & Gadea Autric-Tamayo & Gloria Fernandez-Mayoralas & Fermina Rojo-Perez & María Silveria Agulló-Tomás & Diego Sánchez-González & Vicente Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 2022. "Social Image of Old Age, Gendered Ageism and Inclusive Places: Older People in the Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Ren, Wei & Zhu, Xiaowen, 2024. "The age-based digital divides in China: Trends and socioeconomic differentials (2010–2020)," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3).
    5. Zhizheng Zhang & Wentao Wei & Tianlu Zhu & Ming Zhou & Yajun Li, 2022. "New Dimension on Quality of Life Differences among Older Adults: A Comparative Analysis of Digital Consumption in Urban and Rural Areas of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Kim, Miyea & Oh, Joohyun & Kim, Beomsoo, 2021. "Experience of digital music services and digital self-efficacy among older adults: Enjoyment and anxiety as mediators," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Haimei Li & Li Han & Yibin Ao & Yan Wang & Tong Wang, 2022. "Influences of the Built Environment on Rural School Children’s Travel Mode Choice: The Case of Chengdu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Shelley A. Blozis, 2022. "Bayesian two-part multilevel model for longitudinal media use data," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(4), pages 311-328, December.
    9. Deanna M. Hoelscher & Leigh Ann Ganzar & Deborah Salvo & Harold W. Kohl & Adriana Pérez & Henry Shelton Brown & Sarah S. Bentley & Erin E. Dooley & Amir Emamian & Casey P. Durand, 2022. "Effects of Large-Scale Municipal Safe Routes to School Infrastructure on Student Active Travel and Physical Activity: Design, Methods, and Baseline Data of the Safe Travel Environment Evaluation in Te," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Fealy, Gerard & Di Placido, Matteo & O'Donnell, Deirdre & Drennan, Jonathan & Timmins, Fiona & Barnard, Marlize & Blake, Catherine & Connolly, Michael & Donnelly, Sarah & Doyle, Gerardine & Fitzgerald, 2024. "‘Ageing well’: Discursive constructions of ageing and health in the public reach of a national longitudinal study on ageing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    11. Masoud Javadpoor & Ali Soltani & Leila Fatehnia & Negin Soltani, 2023. "How the Built Environment Moderates Gender Gap in Active Commuting to Schools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Yue Tang & Li Zhu & Jiang Li & Ni Zhang & Yilin Sun & Xiaokang Wang & Honglin Wu, 2023. "Assessment of Perceived Factors of Road Safety in Rural Left-Behind Children’s Independent Travel: A Case Study in Changsha, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Nematullah Hayba & Yumeng Shi & Margaret Allman-Farinelli, 2021. "Enabling Better Physical Activity and Screen Time Behaviours for Adolescents from Middle Eastern Backgrounds: Semi-Structured Interviews with Parents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Dorji Wangzom & Marcus White & Jeni Paay, 2023. "Perceived Safety Influencing Active Travel to School—A Built Environment Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1304-:d:1458320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.