IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i8p1149-d1444129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Sustainability: Cultural-Ecological-Economic Systems Coupling in the Yellow River Basin Based on Service-Dominant Logic

Author

Listed:
  • Zhicai Wu

    (Department of Tourist Management, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
    Key Laboratories of Digital Village and Sustainable Development of Cultural Tourism, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Jianwu Qi

    (Department of Tourist Management, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Jialiang Xie

    (Department of Tourist Management, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Kai Zhang

    (Colleges of Architecture, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

Abstract

The level of coordination between cultural, ecological, and economic systems directly affects the sustainable development of the Yellow River Basin (YRB). However, researchers have neglected the importance of cultural elements in the social-ecological system and have paid insufficient attention to the interaction of cultural, ecological, and economic systems in the YRB. Therefore, a framework of coupled cultural-ecological-economic (CEE) systems was constructed based on service-dominant logic, and the spatiotemporal distribution, evolutionary trends, and factors influencing the coupled coordination of different systems in 76 major cities in the YRB were analyzed by using an entropy-weighted TOPSIS model, coupled coordination model, spatial Markov chain, and panel spatial Dubin model. The results were as follows: (1) the cultural, ecological, and economic systems of the YRB showed a growing trend, the economic system grew faster than the cultural system and the ecosystem, and the ecosystems dominated sustainable development in the YRB. (2) From 2011 to 2022, the type of coupled CEE system coordination in the YRB was mainly in a state of slight incongruity, with the different regions showing temporal consistency and synchronized growth, with the upstream area mainly in a state of moderate incongruity, the midstream area mainly in a state of slight incongruity, and the downstream area concentrating in general coordination. (3) The spatial coordination level of CEE system coupling in the YRB showed the characteristic of “gradually converging to coordination from upstream to downstream” and exhibited upstream low-value agglomeration and downstream high-value agglomeration. Meanwhile, there was a clear trend of spatial spillover in terms of balanced regional development, and 67.11% of the cities in the region and neighboring areas maintained stable development. (4) Tourism development (TD), foreign trade (FT), the human environment (HE), government control (GC), and other factors significantly positively impacted the sustainable development in the YRB. In the future, the focus should be on improving the transregional infrastructure and transportation service systems in the YRB, to enhance cooperation and exchanges between different regions. This research provides new insights and methods for the coordinated development of cultural, ecological, and economic systems at a watershed scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhicai Wu & Jianwu Qi & Jialiang Xie & Kai Zhang, 2024. "Towards Sustainability: Cultural-Ecological-Economic Systems Coupling in the Yellow River Basin Based on Service-Dominant Logic," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1149-:d:1444129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bivand, Roger & Piras, Gianfranco, 2015. "Comparing Implementations of Estimation Methods for Spatial Econometrics," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i18).
    2. Vargo, Stephen L. & Maglio, Paul P. & Akaka, Melissa Archpru, 2008. "On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 145-152, June.
    3. Julie Le Gallo, 2004. "Space-Time Analysis of GDP Disparities among European Regions: A Markov Chains Approach," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 27(2), pages 138-163, April.
    4. Leong, Rachel A.T. & Fung, Tze Kwan & Sachidhanandam, Uma & Drillet, Zuzana & Edwards, Peter J. & Richards, Daniel R., 2020. "Use of structural equation modeling to explore influences on perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices attributed to birds in Singapore," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    5. Chan, Kai M.A. & Satterfield, Terre & Goldstein, Joshua, 2012. "Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 8-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianxiong Bao & Wen Wang & Tianqing Zhao, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Changes of Ecosystem Service Values in Response to Land Cover Dynamics in China from 1992 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Nowak-Olejnik, Agnieszka & Schirpke, Uta & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2022. "A systematic review on subjective well-being benefits associated with cultural ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    4. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    5. Meijerink, Jeroen & Bondarouk, Tanya, 2018. "Uncovering configurations of HRM service provider intellectual capital and worker human capital for creating high HRM service value using fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 31-45.
    6. Kertcher, Zack & Venkatraman, Rohan & Coslor, Erica, 2020. "Pleasingly parallel: Early cross-disciplinary work for innovation diffusion across boundaries in grid computing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 581-594.
    7. Nina Tura & Lea Hannola & Mikko Pynnönen, 2017. "Agile Methods for Boosting the Commercialization Process of New Technology," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Prabal Chakraborty & Moumita Poddar, 2020. "Role of Multiple Stakeholders in Value Co-creation and Effects on Medical Tourism," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 9(1), pages 18-26, June.
    9. Guohuan Su & Adam Mertel & Sébastien Brosse & Justin M. Calabrese, 2023. "Species invasiveness and community invasibility of North American freshwater fish fauna revealed via trait-based analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Yao, Richard T. & Wallace, Lisa, 2024. "A systematic review of non-market ecosystem service values for biosecurity protection," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. María Hierro & Adolfo Maza, 2015. "From Discrete To Continuous-Time Transition Matrices In Intra-Distribution Dynamics Analysis: An Application To Per Capita Wealth In Europe," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 227-235, July.
    12. Hui Zhang & Jin-Biao Yi & Qian Wang, 2021. "Research on the Collaborative Evolution of Blockchain Industry Ecosystems in Terms of Value Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Bordt, Michael, 2018. "Discourses in Ecosystem Accounting: A Survey of the Expert Community," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 82-99.
    14. Kenter, Jasper O. & Bryce, Rosalind & Christie, Michael & Cooper, Nigel & Hockley, Neal & Irvine, Katherine N. & Fazey, Ioan & O’Brien, Liz & Orchard-Webb, Johanne & Ravenscroft, Neil & Raymond, Chris, 2016. "Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 358-371.
    15. Seppo Kuula & Harri Haapasalo & Arto Tolonen, 2018. "Cost-efficient co-creation of knowledge intensive business services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(4), pages 779-808, December.
    16. Rode, Julian & Le Menestrel, Marc & Cornelissen, Gert, 2017. "Ecosystem Service Arguments Enhance Public Support for Environmental Protection - But Beware of the Numbers!," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 213-221.
    17. Tandarić, Neven & Ives, Christopher D. & Watkins, Charles, 2022. "From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    18. Burhan Can Karahasan, 2020. "Can neighbor regions shape club convergence? Spatial Markov chain analysis for Turkey," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 117-131, August.
    19. Thomas Bassetti & Nikos Benos & Stelios Karagiannis, 2013. "CO 2 Emissions and Income Dynamics: What Does the Global Evidence Tell Us?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 54(1), pages 101-125, January.
    20. Kahmann, Birte & Stumpf, Klara Helene & Baumgärtner, Stefan, 2015. "Notions of justice held by stakeholders of the Newfoundland fishery," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 37-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1149-:d:1444129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.