IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p946-d1424638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Urban–Rural Integration in China: A Comparative Case Study of Introducing Small Rural Industries in Huangyan-Taizhou

Author

Listed:
  • Huang Huang

    (Department of Urban Planning, Key Laboratory of Spatial Intelligent Planning Technology, Ministry of Natural Resources, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Daijun Song

    (Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Liyao Wang

    (Department of Urban Planning, Key Laboratory of Spatial Intelligent Planning Technology, Ministry of Natural Resources, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Guiqing Yang

    (Department of Urban Planning, Key Laboratory of Spatial Intelligent Planning Technology, Ministry of Natural Resources, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Yizheng Wang

    (Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Liyuan Fei

    (China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Shanghai Branch, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Ava Lynam

    (Center for Cultural Studies on Science and Technology in China (CCST), Technical University of Berlin, 10553 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Strengthening urban–rural linkages (URLs) has been proposed by UN-Habitat within the framework of ‘Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)’ to narrow down urban–rural differences via shaping new urban–rural relationships. Like URL, the aim of urban–rural integration (URI) has been promoted by the Chinese government since 2019 to address existing urban–rural divides. This concept underlines the ‘rural revitalisation’ strategy and emphasises a two-way flow of urban–rural development factors. Introducing and upgrading ‘appropriate’ rural industries is crucial to stimulate and facilitate the circulation of urban–rural development factors. This research studied three neighbouring villages, situated in urban–rural interface areas in Huangyan-Taizhou, China, each driven by different types of small industries supported by URI. It analyses the impact of small rural industries on the flow of development factors between urban and rural areas. The results showed that small-scale rural industries have been enhanced URL by decreasing urban–rural differences by creating new job opportunities to attract an in-flow population, increasing investments, and upgrading public services and infrastructure. Indigenous industries demonstrated lower profitability but exhibited greater resilience compared to industries linked to global production chains and rural tourism. Thus, this study demonstrates the imperative to carefully consider the opportunities and potential risks associated with pursuing strategies of URI through rural industry development. By providing empirical insights from URI projects in China, this study contributes to theoretical and policy dialogues concerning the concepts of both URL and URI by exploring the localization of SDGs. Furthermore, it offers valuable practical knowledge and experience for other global regions confronting similar challenges to urban and rural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang Huang & Daijun Song & Liyao Wang & Guiqing Yang & Yizheng Wang & Liyuan Fei & Ava Lynam, 2024. "Enhancing Urban–Rural Integration in China: A Comparative Case Study of Introducing Small Rural Industries in Huangyan-Taizhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:946-:d:1424638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/946/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/946/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sophie Bruin & Just Dengerink & Jasper Vliet, 2021. "Urbanisation as driver of food system transformation and opportunities for rural livelihoods," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(4), pages 781-798, August.
    2. Neil Brenner & David J. Madden & David Wachsmuth, 2011. "Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 225-240, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruben, Ruerd & Cavatassi, Romina & Lipper, Leslie & Smaling, Eric & Winter, Paul, 2022. "Research Series 67: Towards food systems transformation – five paradigm shifts for healthy, inclusive and sustainable food systems," IFAD Research Series 320667, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    2. Virna Estefania Moran-Rodas & Verena Preusse & Christine Wachendorf, 2022. "Agricultural Management Practices and Decision-Making in View of Soil Organic Matter in the Urbanizing Region of Bangalore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Hillary Angelo & David Wachsmuth, 2015. "Urbanizing Urban Political Ecology: A Critique of Methodological Cityism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 16-27, January.
    4. Sebastian Ureta, 2014. "The Shelter that Wasn’t There: On the Politics of Co-ordinating Multiple Urban Assemblages in Santiago, Chile," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 231-246, February.
    5. Kevin Ward & Timothy Bunnell, 2021. "Reflections on five years of the Summer Institute in Urban Studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(4), pages 863-878, March.
    6. Jamie Gillen, 2016. "Bringing the countryside to the city: Practices and imaginations of the rural in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(2), pages 324-337, February.
    7. Lejla H Pihljak & Maria Rusca & Cecilia Alda-Vidal & Klaas Schwartz, 2021. "Everyday practices in the production of uneven water pricing regimes in Lilongwe, Malawi," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(2), pages 300-317, March.
    8. Sven Daniel Wolfe, 2023. "Building a better host city? Reforming and contesting the Olympics in Paris 2024," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 257-273, March.
    9. Ana Moragues-Faus & Roberta Sonnino, 2019. "Re-assembling sustainable food cities: An exploration of translocal governance and its multiple agencies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(4), pages 778-794, March.
    10. Just Dengerink & Florentine Dirks & Eunice Likoko & Joost Guijt, 2021. "One size doesn’t fit all: regional differences in priorities for food system transformation," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(6), pages 1455-1466, December.
    11. Scott Rodgers & Clive Barnett & Allan Cochrane, 2014. "Where is Urban Politics?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1551-1560, September.
    12. Chihsin Chiu, 2020. "Theorizing Public Participation and Local Governance in Urban Resilience: Reflections on the “Provincializing Urban Political Ecology” Thesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Ilaria Delponte, 2021. "Institutional and Non-Institutional Governance Initiatives in Urban Transport Planning: The Paradigmatic Case of the Post-Collapse of the Morandi Bridge in Genoa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Julie Gamble, 2017. "Experimental Infrastructure: Experiences in Bicycling in Quito, Ecuador," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 162-180, January.
    15. Andrew Deener, 2016. "The Ecology Of Neighborhood Participation and The Reproduction Of Political Conflict," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 817-832, July.
    16. Oren Yiftachel, 2015. "Epilogue—from ‘Gray Space' to Equal ‘Metrozenship'? Reflections On Urban Citizenship," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 726-737, July.
    17. Muhammad Mushahid Anwar & Juergen H. Breuste & Ayaz Ahmad & Asad Aziz & Ali Abdullah Aldosari, 2023. "Quantifying the Impacts of Urbanization on Urban Agriculture and Food Security in the Megacity Lahore, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    18. Carsten Jungfer & Fernanda Palmieri & Norbert Kling, 2022. "“DALSTON! WHO ASKED U?”: A Knowledge-Centred Perspective on the Mapping of Socio-Spatial Relations in East London," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 191-205.
    19. Lucrecia Bertelli, 2021. "What kind of global city? Circulating policies for ‘slum’ upgrading in the making of world-class Buenos Aires," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1293-1313, September.
    20. Moragues-Faus, Ana & Battersby, Jane, 2021. "Urban food policies for a sustainable and just future: Concepts and tools for a renewed agenda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:946-:d:1424638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.