IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v7y2022i3p191-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“DALSTON! WHO ASKED U?”: A Knowledge-Centred Perspective on the Mapping of Socio-Spatial Relations in East London

Author

Listed:
  • Carsten Jungfer

    (Department of Architecture, University of East London, UK)

  • Fernanda Palmieri

    (Department of Architecture, University of East London, UK)

  • Norbert Kling

    (Department of Architecture, Technical University of Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Since the turn of the millennium, Dalston in the London Borough of Hackney has experienced fundamental change through public and private investment in new infrastructure and processes of urban restructuring. This was paralleled by the reform of the national planning system, which aimed to devolve decision-making to the local level and increase the possibilities for residents and stakeholders to participate in planning processes. However, the difficulty of translating local needs and aspirations into policy goals and broadly accepted area action plans resulted in a crisis, which, in 2018, led to the introduction of the Dalston Conversation and subsequently the revision of planning goals. It is in this context that the Relational States of Dalston mapping project generated and assembled local knowledge about the web of socio-spatial relations between different local actors and in this way highlighted the significance and fragility of the communities’ networks and their spatial dimensions. The collection, ordering, integration, and production of knowledge can be seen as part of the core work in urban planning processes and policymaking. Which forms of knowledge are routinely used in planning contexts and define the relationship between planning action and urban transformation? To what extent could the mapping of local community relations add to this knowledge and help to improve decision-making processes in contested spaces of knowledge? In what ways could a relational understanding of space and architectural modes of research and representation contribute to the analysis, conceptualisation, and communication of local community relations? This article engages with these questions, using the mapping project in Dalston as a case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Carsten Jungfer & Fernanda Palmieri & Norbert Kling, 2022. "“DALSTON! WHO ASKED U?”: A Knowledge-Centred Perspective on the Mapping of Socio-Spatial Relations in East London," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 191-205.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:7:y:2022:i:3:p:191-205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5365
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil Brenner & David J. Madden & David Wachsmuth, 2011. "Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 225-240, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Ureta, 2014. "The Shelter that Wasn’t There: On the Politics of Co-ordinating Multiple Urban Assemblages in Santiago, Chile," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 231-246, February.
    2. Kevin Ward & Timothy Bunnell, 2021. "Reflections on five years of the Summer Institute in Urban Studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(4), pages 863-878, March.
    3. Lejla H Pihljak & Maria Rusca & Cecilia Alda-Vidal & Klaas Schwartz, 2021. "Everyday practices in the production of uneven water pricing regimes in Lilongwe, Malawi," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(2), pages 300-317, March.
    4. Ana Moragues-Faus & Roberta Sonnino, 2019. "Re-assembling sustainable food cities: An exploration of translocal governance and its multiple agencies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(4), pages 778-794, March.
    5. Scott Rodgers & Clive Barnett & Allan Cochrane, 2014. "Where is Urban Politics?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1551-1560, September.
    6. Chihsin Chiu, 2020. "Theorizing Public Participation and Local Governance in Urban Resilience: Reflections on the “Provincializing Urban Political Ecology” Thesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Lucrecia Bertelli, 2021. "What kind of global city? Circulating policies for ‘slum’ upgrading in the making of world-class Buenos Aires," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1293-1313, September.
    8. Bertelli, Lucrecia, 2021. "What kind of global city? Circulating policies for ‘slum’ upgrading in the making of world-class Buenos Aires," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109311, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Colin McFarlane, 2011. "On context," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3-4), pages 375-388, August.
    10. Arnoud Lagendijk & Rianne Melik & Freek Haan & Huib Ernste & Huub Ploegmakers & Serap Kayasu, 2014. "Comparative Approaches to Gentrification: A Research Framework," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(3), pages 358-365, July.
    11. Fran Tonkiss, 2011. "Template urbanism," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 584-588, October.
    12. Gareth Millington, 2016. "Urbanization and the City Image in Lowry at Tate Britain: Towards a Critique of Cultural Cityism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 717-735, July.
    13. Michael Storper & Allen J Scott, 2016. "Current debates in urban theory: A critical assessment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1114-1136, May.
    14. Trevor J Wideman & Jeffrey R Masuda, 2018. "Toponymic assemblages, resistance, and the politics of planning in Vancouver, Canada," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(3), pages 383-402, May.
    15. Kim Dovey & Fujie Rao & Elek Pafka, 2018. "Agglomeration and assemblage: Deterritorialising urban theory," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(2), pages 263-273, February.
    16. Ricardo Cardoso & Jia‐Ching Chen & Henrik Ernstson, 2023. "BLOCOS URBANISM: Capitalism and Modularity in the Making of Contemporary Luanda," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 809-832, September.
    17. Nancy Odendaal, 2021. "Everyday urbanisms and the importance of place: Exploring the elements of the emancipatory smart city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 639-654, February.
    18. Keith Harris, 2014. "For creative appropriation: John Protevi's Life, War, Earth and urban studies," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4-5), pages 594-597, October.
    19. Kearns, Robin A. & Coleman, Tara M. & Edmeades, Jonathan, 2019. "New Zealand children's health stamps: Ideological artefacts linking health and place," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 38-46.
    20. Jamie Peck, 2013. "For Polanyian Economic Geographies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(7), pages 1545-1568, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:7:y:2022:i:3:p:191-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.