IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p1039-d1432728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing the Performance of Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Frequency Ratio and Gaussian Mixture Model

Author

Listed:
  • Wenchao Huangfu

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    Institute of Earth Surface System and Hazards, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Haijun Qiu

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    Institute of Earth Surface System and Hazards, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Weicheng Wu

    (Key Laboratory of Digital Lands and Resources, Faculty of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Yaozu Qin

    (Key Laboratory of Digital Lands and Resources, Faculty of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Xiaoting Zhou

    (School of Architectural Engineering, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Yang Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

  • Mohib Ullah

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Yanfen He

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

Abstract

A rational landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) can minimize the losses caused by landslides and enhance the efficiency of disaster prevention and reduction. At present, frequency ratio (FR), information value (IV), and certainty factor (CF) are widely used to quantify the relationships between landslides and their causative factors; however, it remains unclear which method is the most effective. Moreover, existing landslide susceptibility zoning methods lack full automation; thus, the results are full of uncertainties. To address this, the FR, IV, and CF were used to analyze the relationship between landslides and causative factors. Subsequently, three distinct sets of models were developed, namely random forest models (RF_FR, RF_IV, and RF_CF), support vector machine models (SVM_FR, SVM_IV, and SVM_CF), and logistic regression models (LR_FR, LR_IV, and LR_CF) using the analysis results as inputs. A Gaussian mixture model (GMM) was introduced as a new method for landslide susceptibility zoning, classifying the LSM into five distinct levels. An accuracy evaluation of the models and a rationality analysis of the LSM indicated that the FR is superior to the IV and CF in quantifying the relationship between landslides and causative factors. Additionally, the quantile method was employed as a comparative approach to the GMM, further validating the effectiveness of the GMM. This research contributes to more effective and efficient LSM, ultimately enhancing landslide prevention measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenchao Huangfu & Haijun Qiu & Weicheng Wu & Yaozu Qin & Xiaoting Zhou & Yang Zhang & Mohib Ullah & Yanfen He, 2024. "Enhancing the Performance of Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Frequency Ratio and Gaussian Mixture Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-27, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1039-:d:1432728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1039/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1039/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. van Westen & N. Rengers & R. Soeters, 2003. "Use of Geomorphological Information in Indirect Landslide Susceptibility Assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 30(3), pages 399-419, November.
    2. Zhang, Jinhua & Yan, Jie & Infield, David & Liu, Yongqian & Lien, Fue-sang, 2019. "Short-term forecasting and uncertainty analysis of wind turbine power based on long short-term memory network and Gaussian mixture model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 229-244.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Benxi & Liu, Tengyuan & Liao, Shengli & Lu, Jia & Cheng, Chuntian, 2023. "Short-term coordinated hybrid hydro-wind-solar optimal scheduling model considering multistage section restrictions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Dou, Weijing & Wang, Kai & Shan, Shuo & Li, Chenxi & Wang, Yiye & Zhang, Kanjian & Wei, Haikun & Sreeram, Victor, 2024. "Day-ahead Numerical Weather Prediction solar irradiance correction using a clustering method based on weather conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    3. Yang, Mao & Wang, Da & Xu, Chuanyu & Dai, Bozhi & Ma, Miaomiao & Su, Xin, 2023. "Power transfer characteristics in fluctuation partition algorithm for wind speed and its application to wind power forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 582-594.
    4. Cristina Tarantino & Palma Blonda & Guido Pasquariello, 2007. "Remote sensed data for automatic detection of land-use changes due to human activity in support to landslide studies," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 41(1), pages 245-267, April.
    5. Wang, Yun & Zou, Runmin & Liu, Fang & Zhang, Lingjun & Liu, Qianyi, 2021. "A review of wind speed and wind power forecasting with deep neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    6. Hyo-sub Kang & Yun-tae Kim, 2016. "The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1475-1493, February.
    7. Jia, Mengshuo & Huang, Shaowei & Wang, Zhiwen & Shen, Chen, 2021. "Privacy-preserving distributed parameter estimation for probability distribution of wind power forecast error," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1318-1332.
    8. Meng, Anbo & Zhang, Haitao & Yin, Hao & Xian, Zikang & Chen, Shu & Zhu, Zibin & Zhang, Zheng & Rong, Jiayu & Li, Chen & Wang, Chenen & Wu, Zhenbo & Deng, Weisi & Luo, Jianqiang & Wang, Xiaolin, 2023. "A novel multi-gradient evolutionary deep learning approach for few-shot wind power prediction using time-series GAN," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    9. Žiga Malek & Veronica Zumpano & Haydar Hussin, 2018. "Forest management and future changes to ecosystem services in the Romanian Carpathians," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1275-1291, June.
    10. Işık, Cem & Kuziboev, Bekhzod & Ongan, Serdar & Saidmamatov, Olimjon & Mirkhoshimova, Mokhirakhon & Rajabov, Alibek, 2024. "The volatility of global energy uncertainty: Renewable alternatives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    11. Netra Bhandary & Ranjan Dahal & Manita Timilsina & Ryuichi Yatabe, 2013. "Rainfall event-based landslide susceptibility zonation mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 365-388, October.
    12. Hanifi, Shahram & Cammarono, Andrea & Zare-Behtash, Hossein, 2024. "Advanced hyperparameter optimization of deep learning models for wind power prediction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Meng, Anbo & Zhu, Zibin & Deng, Weisi & Ou, Zuhong & Lin, Shan & Wang, Chenen & Xu, Xuancong & Wang, Xiaolin & Yin, Hao & Luo, Jianqiang, 2022. "A novel wind power prediction approach using multivariate variational mode decomposition and multi-objective crisscross optimization based deep extreme learning machine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Ashraf Abdelkarim & Ahmed F. D. Gaber & Ibtesam I. Alkadi & Haya M. Alogayell, 2019. "Integrating Remote Sensing and Hydrologic Modeling to Assess the Impact of Land-Use Changes on the Increase of Flood Risk: A Case Study of the Riyadh–Dammam Train Track, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-32, October.
    15. Paúl Carrión-Mero & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Fernando Morante-Carballo & Adolfo Quesada-Román & Boris Apolo-Masache, 2021. "Worldwide Research Trends in Landslide Science," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-24, September.
    16. C. Abdallah & G. Faour, 2017. "Landslide hazard mapping of Ibrahim River Basin, Lebanon," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(1), pages 237-266, January.
    17. Nikolaos Tavoularis & George Papathanassiou & Athanassios Ganas & Panagiotis Argyrakis, 2021. "Development of the Landslide Susceptibility Map of Attica Region, Greece, Based on the Method of Rock Engineering System," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31, February.
    18. Saeid SHABANI, 2017. "Modelling and mapping of soil damage caused by harvesting in Caspian forests (Iran) using CART and RF data mining techniques," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(9), pages 425-432.
    19. Yu, Binbin & Li, Jianjing & Liu, Che & Sun, Bo, 2022. "A novel short-term electrical load forecasting framework with intelligent feature engineering," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    20. Massimo Conforti & Gaetano Robustelli & Francesco Muto & Salvatore Critelli, 2012. "Application and validation of bivariate GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment for the Vitravo river catchment (Calabria, south Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(1), pages 127-141, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1039-:d:1432728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.