IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p875-d1416776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy of Determination of Corresponding Points from Available Providers of Spatial Data—A Case Study from Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Slavomir Labant

    (Institute of Geodesy, Cartography and Geographical Information Systems, Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnology, Technical University of Kosice, 04200 Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Patrik Petovsky

    (Institute of Geodesy, Cartography and Geographical Information Systems, Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnology, Technical University of Kosice, 04200 Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Pavel Sustek

    (Department of Geodesy and Mine Surveying, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 70833 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Lubomir Leicher

    (Department of Geodesy and Mine Surveying, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 70833 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Mapping the terrain and the Earth’s surface can be performed through non-contact methoYes, that is correct.ds such as laser scanning. This is one of the most dynamic and effective data collection methods. This case study aims to analyze the usability of spatial data from available sources and to choose the appropriate solutions and procedures for processing the point cloud of the area of interest obtained from available web applications. The processing of the point cloud obtained by airborne laser scanning results in digital terrain models created in selected software. The study also included modeling of different types of residential development, and the results were evaluated. Different data sources may have compatibility issues, which means that the position of the same object from different spatial data databases may not be identical. To address this, deviations of the corresponding points were determined from various data sources such as Real Estate Cadaster, ZBGIS Buildings, LiDAR point cloud, orthophoto mosaic, and geodetic measurements. These deviations were analyzed according to their size and orientation, with the average deviations ranging from 0.22 to 0.34 m and standard deviations from 0.11 to 0.20 m. The Real Estate Cadaster was used as the correct basis for comparison. The area of the building was also compared, with the slightest difference being present between the Real Estate Cadaster and geodetic measurement. The difference was zero after rounding the area to whole numbers. The maximum area difference was +5 m 2 for ZBGIS Buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Slavomir Labant & Patrik Petovsky & Pavel Sustek & Lubomir Leicher, 2024. "Accuracy of Determination of Corresponding Points from Available Providers of Spatial Data—A Case Study from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:875-:d:1416776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/875/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/875/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malof, Jordan M. & Bradbury, Kyle & Collins, Leslie M. & Newell, Richard G., 2016. "Automatic detection of solar photovoltaic arrays in high resolution aerial imagery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 229-240.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Müller, Jonas & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2020. "Spatial projections of solar PV installations at subnational level: Accuracy testing of regression models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Konstantinos Ioannou & Dimitrios Myronidis, 2021. "Automatic Detection of Photovoltaic Farms Using Satellite Imagery and Convolutional Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Yagli, Gokhan Mert & Yang, Dazhi & Gandhi, Oktoviano & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2020. "Can we justify producing univariate machine-learning forecasts with satellite-derived solar irradiance?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Mao, Hongzhi & Chen, Xie & Luo, Yongqiang & Deng, Jie & Tian, Zhiyong & Yu, Jinghua & Xiao, Yimin & Fan, Jianhua, 2023. "Advances and prospects on estimating solar photovoltaic installation capacity and potential based on satellite and aerial images," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Marcela Bindzarova Gergelova & Slavomir Labant & Stefan Kuzevic & Zofia Kuzevicova & Henrieta Pavolova, 2020. "Identification of Roof Surfaces from LiDAR Cloud Points by GIS Tools: A Case Study of Lučenec, Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Fabio Giussani & Eric Wilczynski & Claudio Zandonella Callegher & Giovanni Dalle Nogare & Cristian Pozza & Antonio Novelli & Simon Pezzutto, 2024. "Use of Machine Learning Techniques on Aerial Imagery for the Extraction of Photovoltaic Data within the Urban Morphology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Gabriel Kasmi & Augustin Touron & Philippe Blanc & Yves-Marie Saint-Drenan & Maxime Fortin & Laurent Dubus, 2024. "Remote-Sensing-Based Estimation of Rooftop Photovoltaic Power Production Using Physical Conversion Models and Weather Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Li, Kangping & Wang, Fei & Mi, Zengqiang & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmoud & Duić, Neven & Wang, Tieqiang, 2019. "Capacity and output power estimation approach of individual behind-the-meter distributed photovoltaic system for demand response baseline estimation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Mayer, Kevin & Rausch, Benjamin & Arlt, Marie-Louise & Gust, Gunther & Wang, Zhecheng & Neumann, Dirk & Rajagopal, Ram, 2022. "3D-PV-Locator: Large-scale detection of rooftop-mounted photovoltaic systems in 3D," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    10. Juan-Pablo Villegas-Ceballos & Mateo Rico-Garcia & Carlos Andres Ramos-Paja, 2022. "Dataset for Detecting the Electrical Behavior of Photovoltaic Panels from RGB Images," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-12, June.
    11. Chen, Qi & Li, Xinyuan & Zhang, Zhengjia & Zhou, Chao & Guo, Zhiling & Liu, Zhengguang & Zhang, Haoran, 2023. "Remote sensing of photovoltaic scenarios: Techniques, applications and future directions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    12. Lu, Ning & Li, Liang & Qin, Jun, 2024. "PV Identifier: Extraction of small-scale distributed photovoltaics in complex environments from high spatial resolution remote sensing images," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    13. Yin, Hui & Zhou, Kaile, 2022. "Performance evaluation of China's photovoltaic poverty alleviation project using machine learning and satellite images," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    14. Tan, Hongjun & Guo, Zhiling & Zhang, Haoran & Chen, Qi & Lin, Zhenjia & Chen, Yuntian & Yan, Jinyue, 2023. "Enhancing PV panel segmentation in remote sensing images with constraint refinement modules," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    15. Li, Binghui & Feng, Cong & Siebenschuh, Carlo & Zhang, Rui & Spyrou, Evangelia & Krishnan, Venkat & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Zhang, Jie, 2022. "Sizing ramping reserve using probabilistic solar forecasts: A data-driven method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    16. Hu, Wei & Bradbury, Kyle & Malof, Jordan M. & Li, Boning & Huang, Bohao & Streltsov, Artem & Sydny Fujita, K. & Hoen, Ben, 2022. "What you get is not always what you see—pitfalls in solar array assessment using overhead imagery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    17. Marcus Vinícius Coelho Vieira da Costa & Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho & Alex Gois Orlandi & Issao Hirata & Anesmar Olino de Albuquerque & Felipe Vilarinho e Silva & Renato Fontes Guimarães & Robert, 2021. "Remote Sensing for Monitoring Photovoltaic Solar Plants in Brazil Using Deep Semantic Segmentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Daxini, Rajiv & Wilson, Robin & Wu, Yupeng, 2023. "Modelling the spectral influence on photovoltaic device performance using the average photon energy and the depth of a water absorption band for improved forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    19. Yongshi Jie & Xianhua Ji & Anzhi Yue & Jingbo Chen & Yupeng Deng & Jing Chen & Yi Zhang, 2020. "Combined Multi-Layer Feature Fusion and Edge Detection Method for Distributed Photovoltaic Power Station Identification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Erdener, Burcin Cakir & Feng, Cong & Doubleday, Kate & Florita, Anthony & Hodge, Bri-Mathias, 2022. "A review of behind-the-meter solar forecasting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:875-:d:1416776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.