IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p834-d1413204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Organic Carbon Content and Its Relationship with the Stand Age in Tea Plantations ( Camellia sinensis L.) in Fujian Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Miaomiao Wang

    (Institute of Digital Agriculture, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, China
    Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100045, China)

  • Jian Zhao

    (Institute of Digital Agriculture, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, China)

  • Jinghua Chen

    (Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100045, China)

  • Xinyi Zhang

    (Institute of Digital Agriculture, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, China)

  • Shilei Zhu

    (Institute of Digital Agriculture, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, China)

Abstract

Optimizing soil carbon content is essential for mitigating climate change. Understanding the soil organic carbon (SOC) contents and their relationship with plantation age is important for enhancing SOC in tea plantations. However, there is still a lack of studies in quantifying the SOC–age curve of the whole life cycle in tea plantations. Thus, in this study, we collected 140 soil samples aged 3 to 60 years in the four representative regions (Anxi, Datian, Qingliu, and Fuzhou) in Fujian Province to quantify the SOC contents and their relationship with plantation age. We found that the average SOC was 14.6 ± 6.1 g/kg in the four sampling regions. Nitrogen (N) emerged as having a highly significant positive correlation with SOC (R 2 = 0.9). We also found a significant negative correlation between SOC and mean annual temperature (MAT) (R 2 = 0.6), and a significant positive correlation with mean annual precipitation (MAP) (R 2 = 0.6). The SOC increased with plantation age at 3–20 years old and peaked at 16–20 years old. After 35 years, the SOC decreased gradually with the aging of the plantation. The results indicated that tea plantations could be renewed after the age of 35. These results showed that optimizing age structure is important in enhancing SOC in tea plantations and is meaningful in achieving carbon neutrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Miaomiao Wang & Jian Zhao & Jinghua Chen & Xinyi Zhang & Shilei Zhu, 2024. "Soil Organic Carbon Content and Its Relationship with the Stand Age in Tea Plantations ( Camellia sinensis L.) in Fujian Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:834-:d:1413204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/834/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/834/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jason C. Neff & Alan R. Townsend & Gerd Gleixner & Scott J. Lehman & Jocelyn Turnbull & William D. Bowman, 2002. "Variable effects of nitrogen additions on the stability and turnover of soil carbon," Nature, Nature, vol. 419(6910), pages 915-917, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fei Liu & Huaruo Chen & Jie Xu & Ya Wen & Tingting Fang, 2021. "Exploring the Relationships between Resilience and Turnover Intention in Chinese High School Teachers: Considering the Moderating Role of Job Burnout," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Nicholas Glass & Brenda Molano-Flores & Eduardo Dias de Oliveira & Erika Meraz & Samira Umar & Christopher J. Whelan & Miquel A. Gonzalez-Meler, 2021. "Does Pastoral Land-Use Legacy Influence Topsoil Carbon and Nitrogen Accrual Rates in Tallgrass Prairie Restorations?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Elsayed Said Mohamed & Mohamed Abu-hashim & Mohamed A. E. AbdelRahman & Brigitta Schütt & Rosa Lasaponara, 2019. "Evaluating the Effects of Human Activity over the Last Decades on the Soil Organic Carbon Pool Using Satellite Imagery and GIS Techniques in the Nile Delta Area, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Gabriela Mühlbachová & Pavel Růžek & Helena Kusá & Radek Vavera & Martin Káš, 2021. "Winter Wheat Straw Decomposition under Different Nitrogen Fertilizers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Annachiara Forte & Angelo Fierro, 2019. "Denitrification Rate and Its Potential to Predict Biogenic N 2 O Field Emissions in a Mediterranean Maize-Cropped Soil in Southern Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Sandra Duarte-Guardia & Pablo L. Peri & Wulf Amelung & Douglas Sheil & Shawn W. Laffan & Nils Borchard & Michael I. Bird & Wouter Dieleman & David A. Pepper & Brian Zutta & Esteban Jobbagy & Lucas C. , 2019. "Better estimates of soil carbon from geographical data: a revised global approach," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 355-372, March.
    7. Lamla, Michael J., 2009. "Long-run determinants of pollution: A robustness analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 135-144, November.
    8. Shiwei Gong & Tao Zhang & Jixun Guo, 2019. "Warming and Nitrogen Addition Change the Soil and Soil Microbial Biomass C:N:P Stoichiometry of a Meadow Steppe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Corina Carranca & Filipe Pedra & Manuel Madeira, 2022. "Enhancing Carbon Sequestration in Mediterranean Agroforestry Systems: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Mi Tian & Chao Wu & Xin Zhu & Qinghai Hu & Xueqiu Wang & Binbin Sun & Jian Zhou & Wei Wang & Qinghua Chi & Hanliang Liu & Yuheng Liu & Jiwu Yang & Xurong Li, 2024. "Spatial–Temporal Variations in Soil Organic Carbon and Driving Factors in Guangdong, China (2009–2023)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:834-:d:1413204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.