IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p825-d1411151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Vulnerability Assessment for Mountain Cities Based on the GA-BP Neural Network: A Case Study in Linzhou, Henan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yutong Duan

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Miao Yu

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Weiyang Sun

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shiyang Zhang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yunyuan Li

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Mountain cities with complex topographies have always been highly vulnerable areas to global environmental change, prone to geological hazards, climate change, and human activities. Exploring and analyzing the vulnerability of coupling systems in mountain cities is highly important for improving regional resilience and promoting sustainable regional development. Therefore, a comprehensive framework for assessing the spatial vulnerability of mountain cities is proposed. A vulnerability assessment index system is constructed using three functional systems, ecological protection, agricultural production, and urban construction. Subsequently, the BP neural network and the genetic algorithm (GA) are combined to establish a vulnerability assessment model, and geographically weighted regression (GWR) is introduced to analyze the spatial influence of one-dimensional systems on the coupling system. Linzhou, a typical mountain city at the boundary between China’s second- and third-step terrains, was selected as a case study to demonstrate the feasibility of the framework. The results showed that the vulnerability of the ecological protection system was highly aggregated in the east–central region, that of the agricultural production system was high in the west, and that of the urban construction system was low in the central region and high in the northwestern region. The coupling system vulnerability was characterized by multispatial distribution. The complex topography and geomorphology and the resulting natural hazards are the underlying causes of the vulnerability results. The impact of ecological and urban systems on the coupling system vulnerability is more prominent. The proposed framework can serve as a reference for vulnerability assessments of other similar mountain cities with stepped topographies to support the formulation of sustainable development strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yutong Duan & Miao Yu & Weiyang Sun & Shiyang Zhang & Yunyuan Li, 2024. "Spatial Vulnerability Assessment for Mountain Cities Based on the GA-BP Neural Network: A Case Study in Linzhou, Henan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:825-:d:1411151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/825/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/825/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quoc Bao Pham & Sk Ajim Ali & Elzbieta Bielecka & Beata Calka & Agata Orych & Farhana Parvin & Ewa Łupikasza, 2022. "Flood vulnerability and buildings’ flood exposure assessment in a densely urbanised city: comparative analysis of three scenarios using a neural network approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 1043-1081, September.
    2. Shashidhar Kumar Jha & A. K. Negi & Juha M. Alatalo & R. S. Negi, 2021. "Socio-ecological vulnerability and resilience of mountain communities residing in capital-constrained environments," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Yining Ma & Suri Guga & Jie Xu & Yulin Su & Xingpeng Liu & Zhijun Tong & Jiquan Zhang, 2022. "Agricultural Vulnerability Assessment of High-Temperature Disaster in Shaanxi Province of China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Muhammad Ziaul Hoque & Shenghui Cui & Lilai Xu & Imranul Islam & Jianxiong Tang & Shengping Ding, 2019. "Assessing Agricultural Livelihood Vulnerability to Climate Change in Coastal Bangladesh," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Xu & Junlong Gao & Xinchun Yu & Qianqian Qin & Shiqiang Du & Jiahong Wen, 2024. "Assessment of Rainstorm Waterlogging Disaster Risk in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas Based on Land Use Scenario Simulation: A Case Study of Jiangqiao Town in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Sanjib Mondal & Pritam Ghosh & Pratima Rohatgi, 2023. "Village‐level livelihood security: A case study on a wasteland‐dominated forest fringe region of rural India," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 1019-1036, June.
    3. Nannan Wang & Dengfeng Cui, 2023. "Impact of demonstration zone policy on agricultural science and technology innovation: evidence from China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Hao Chen & Zongxue Xu & Yang Liu & Yixuan Huang & Fang Yang, 2022. "Urban Flood Risk Assessment Based on Dynamic Population Distribution and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Pingyi Ma & Xueyan Zhao & Hua Li, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution of Socio-Ecological System Vulnerability on the Loess Plateau under Rapid Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Jiarui Sun & Lu Zhou & Hua Zong, 2022. "Landscape Pattern Vulnerability of the Eastern Hengduan Mountains, China and Response to Elevation and Artificial Disturbance," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Jing Wang & Ying Wang & Geng Lin, 2024. "Study on Rural Classification and Resilience Evaluation Based on PSR Model: A Case Study of Lvshunkou District, Dalian City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Irem Sahmutoglu & Alev Taskin & Ertugrul Ayyildiz, 2023. "Assembly area risk assessment methodology for post-flood evacuation by integrated neutrosophic AHP-CODAS," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 1071-1103, March.
    9. Qi Chen & Hongyan Su & Xuan Yu & Qiuguang Hu, 2020. "Livelihood Vulnerability of Marine Fishermen to Multi-Stresses under the Vessel Buyback and Fishermen Transfer Programs in China: The Case of Zhoushan City, Zhejiang Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Maggie G. Munthali & Mengistie Kindu & Abiodun M. Adeola & Nerhene Davis & Joel O. Botai & Negasi Solomon, 2023. "Variations of ecosystem service values as a response to land use and land cover dynamics in central malawi," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9821-9837, September.
    11. Cheng Han & Yang Zhang & Jing Shen, 2022. "Fuzzy-Based Ecological Vulnerability Assessment Driven by Human Impacts in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:825-:d:1411151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.