IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i5p681-d1394028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Relationship between Geographic Groupings and Perspective of Critical Community Issues: An Audience Segmentation Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Alyssa Schmidt

    (PowerSecure, Inc., Durham, NC 27703, USA)

  • Kevan W. Lamm

    (Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

  • Abigail Borron

    (Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

  • Alexa J. Lamm

    (Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

Abstract

The present study examined whether perception of critical community issues was dependent on respondents’ rurality, geographic region, or extension district in the state of Georgia, located in the southeastern United States. A non-probability sampling procedure was employed. A total of 3,374 responses were collected. Five critical community issue themes were analyzed: (1) youth and family development, (2) civic engagement and community development, (3) agriculture and economic development, (4) nutrition education and food availability, and (5) water. Descriptive statistics were analyzed. A series of chi-squared tests of independence were used to test for significant relationships between perception of critical community issues and geographic grouping. Statistically significant differences were observed between all groups (rurality, region, and district). Specifically, significant relationships were observed between all groups and perception of youth and family development and agriculture and economic development. A significant relationship between region and perception of civic engagement and community leadership was observed. Additionally, there was a significant relationship between rurality and water observed. The results indicate that programming efforts should be informed both by proximal communities as well as non-proximal communities sharing common characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Alyssa Schmidt & Kevan W. Lamm & Abigail Borron & Alexa J. Lamm, 2024. "Examining the Relationship between Geographic Groupings and Perspective of Critical Community Issues: An Audience Segmentation Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:681-:d:1394028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/681/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/681/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lena E. Etuk & Mallory L. Rahe & Mindy S. Crandall & Michaella Sektnan & Sally Bowman, 2013. "Rural leadership development: pathways to community change," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 411-425, October.
    2. Wade, Gail & Hanuschak, George, 2000. "Visualization of a Crop Season: The Integration of Remotely Sensed Data and Survey Data," NASS Research Reports 234248, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    3. Kim Skobba & Karen Tinsley, 2016. "Addressing housing and neighborhood revitalization needs in Georgia’s rural and small towns: A study of the Georgia Initiative for Community Housing," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 449-463, July.
    4. Ebunoluwa Odeyemi & Kimberly Skobba, 2021. "Who is at the table? Civic engagement in small town housing decision-making," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 1014-1036, November.
    5. Margherita Masi & Jorgelina Di Pasquale & Yari Vecchio & Fabian Capitanio, 2023. "Precision Farming: Barriers of Variable Rate Technology Adoption in Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Elmore, Kristen C. & Sumner, Rachel & Tifft, Megan & Forstrom, Melanie A. & Burrow, Anthony L., 2019. "Building collaborative youth development research-practice partnerships through Cooperative Extension," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Kevan W. Lamm & Maddison Holder & Nekeisha L. Randall & Don W. Edgar & Alexa J. Lamm, 2021. "Agricultural Leadership Development Program Participant Personality and Demographic Characteristics: An Empirical Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Concetta Cardillo & Luca Bartoli & Marcello De Rosa & Martina Francescone & Margherita Masi & Hanae Sahir & Yari Vecchio, 2024. "Exploring Diversification Strategies among Italian Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Beata Michaliszyn-Gabryś & Joachim Bronder & Janusz Krupanek, 2024. "Social Life Cycle Assessment of Laser Weed Control System: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Agans, Jennifer P. & Maley, Mary & Rainone, Nicolette & Cope, Marie & Turner, Andrew & Eckenrode, John & Pillemer, Karl, 2020. "Evaluating the evidence for youth outcomes in 4-H: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Anthony L. Burrow, 2023. "Beyond Finding Purpose: Motivating a Translational Science of Purpose Acquisition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-11, June.
    5. Beata Michaliszyn-Gabryś & Joachim Bronder & Wanda Jarosz & Janusz Krupanek, 2024. "Potential of Eco-Weeding with High-Power Laser Adoption from the Farmers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Reza Banai, 2024. "How Does the Neighborhood Unit Inform Community Revitalization?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Marilena Gemtou & Konstantina Kakkavou & Evangelos Anastasiou & Spyros Fountas & Soren Marcus Pedersen & Gohar Isakhanyan & Kassa Tarekegn Erekalo & Serafin Pazos-Vidal, 2024. "Farmers’ Transition to Climate-Smart Agriculture: A Systematic Review of the Decision-Making Factors Affecting Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-34, March.
    8. Radlick, Rebecca Lynn & Przedpelska, Sarah, 2024. "Participatory research approaches to studying social capital in youth mentoring: Not the panacea we hoped for," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:681-:d:1394028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.