IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i4p458-d1369799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Typical Small Watershed in Southwestern China Is Demonstrated as a Significant Carbon Sink

Author

Listed:
  • Wenguang Chen

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yafeng Lu

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • He Yin

    (Department of Geography, Kent State University, 325 S. Lincoln Street, Kent, OH 44242, USA)

  • Xiaokang Zhou

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Zhengyang Li

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yanguo Liu

    (Mianyang Science and Technology City Division, the National Remote Sensing Center of China, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China)

Abstract

Small watersheds are fundamental units for natural processes and social management in Southwestern China. Accurately assessing carbon sinks in small watersheds is crucial for formulating carbon sink management policies. However, there has been a lack of assessment of the dynamics of carbon fluxes in the major ecosystems of small watersheds. Here, we selected the Reshuihe River watershed, which is a typical small watershed in Southwestern China, to measure carbon fluxes using eddy covariance systems for two years (October 2021 to September 2023) from three major ecosystems, namely forest, cropland, and non-timber forest. We compared variations and controlling factors of net ecosystem exchange (NEE), gross primary productivity (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (Re) among different ecosystems, and estimated annual watershed carbon flux based on the land cover areas of the three ecosystems. This study found that three ecosystems were net annual carbon sinks during the study period. Forest was the strongest (−592.8 and −488.1 gC m −2 a −1 ), followed by non-timber forest (−371.0 gC m −2 a −1 ), and cropland was the smallest (−92.5 and −71.6 gC m −2 a −1 ), after taking fallow period into account. Weeds were a significant source of carbon flux in non-timber forest ecosystems. It was also found that variations in daily NEE were controlled by photosynthetically active radiation and soil volumetric water content, with weak effects related to temperature also being observed. However, when the temperature exceeded 21 °C, GPP and Re were significantly reduced in cropland. Finally, it was discovered that the total carbon sink of the three ecosystems in the watershed for one year was −52.15 Gg C. Overall, we found that small watersheds dominated by forest ecosystems in Southwestern China have a strong carbon sink capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenguang Chen & Yafeng Lu & He Yin & Xiaokang Zhou & Zhengyang Li & Yanguo Liu, 2024. "A Typical Small Watershed in Southwestern China Is Demonstrated as a Significant Carbon Sink," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:458-:d:1369799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Wang & Liang Feng & Paul I. Palmer & Yi Liu & Shuangxi Fang & Hartmut Bösch & Christopher W. O’Dell & Xiaoping Tang & Dongxu Yang & Lixin Liu & ChaoZong Xia, 2020. "Large Chinese land carbon sink estimated from atmospheric carbon dioxide data," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7831), pages 720-723, October.
    2. Liu, Ziqi & Li, Kaiping & Xiong, Kangning & Li, Yuan & Wang, Jin & Sun, Jian & Cai, Lulu, 2021. "Effects of Zanthoxylum bungeanum planting on soil hydraulic properties and soil moisture in a karst area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    3. Shilong Piao & Jingyun Fang & Philippe Ciais & Philippe Peylin & Yao Huang & Stephen Sitch & Tao Wang, 2009. "The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7241), pages 1009-1013, April.
    4. Jing Wang & Liang Feng & Paul I. Palmer & Yi Liu & Shuangxi Fang & Hartmut Bösch & Christopher W. O’Dell & Xiaoping Tang & Dongxu Yang & Lixin Liu & ChaoZong Xia, 2020. "Publisher Correction: Large Chinese land carbon sink estimated from atmospheric carbon dioxide data," Nature, Nature, vol. 588(7837), pages 19-19, December.
    5. Xing, Wanqiu & Yang, Lilin & Wang, Weiguang & Yu, Zhongbo & Shao, Quanxi & Xu, Shiqin & Fu, Jianyu, 2023. "Environmental controls on carbon and water fluxes of a wheat-maize rotation cropland over the Huaibei Plain of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    6. Li, Cheng & Li, Zhaozhe & Zhang, Fangmin & Lu, Yanyu & Duan, Chunfeng & Xu, Yang, 2023. "Seasonal dynamics of carbon dioxide and water fluxes in a rice-wheat rotation system in the Yangtze-Huaihe region of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luyi Qiu & Kunying Niu & Wei He & Yaqi Hu, 2023. "Two Contribution Paths of Carbon Neutrality: Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Sinks and Anthropogenic Carbon Emission Reduction—A Case of Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Shenghang Wang & Shen Tan & Jiaming Xu, 2023. "Evaluation and Implication of the Policies towards China’s Carbon Neutrality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Dongwei Liu & Shanlong Li & Weixing Zhu & Yongyang Wang & Shasha Zhang & Yunting Fang, 2023. "Storage and Stability of Soil Organic Carbon in Two Temperate Forests in Northeastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Zhen Yu & Philippe Ciais & Shilong Piao & Richard A. Houghton & Chaoqun Lu & Hanqin Tian & Evgenios Agathokleous & Giri Raj Kattel & Stephen Sitch & Daniel Goll & Xu Yue & Anthony Walker & Pierre Frie, 2022. "Forest expansion dominates China’s land carbon sink since 1980," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Chaochao Du & Xiaoyong Bai & Yangbing Li & Qiu Tan & Cuiwei Zhao & Guangjie Luo & Luhua Wu & Fei Chen & Chaojun Li & Chen Ran & Xuling Luo & Huipeng Xi & Huan Chen & Sirui Zhang & Min Liu & Suhua Gong, 2022. "Inventory of China’s Net Biome Productivity since the 21st Century," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Jie Huang & Zimin Sun & Pengshu Zhong, 2022. "The Spatial Disequilibrium and Dynamic Evolution of the Net Agriculture Carbon Effect in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Shiliang Liu & Yuhong Dong & Hua Liu & Fangfang Wang & Lu Yu, 2023. "Review of Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services and Realization Approaches in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Liu, Shilei & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Forest harvesting restriction and forest restoration in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    9. Quanxu Hu & Jinhe Zhang & Huaju Xue & Jingwei Wang & Aiqing Li, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Variations in Carbon Sources and Sinks in National Park Ecosystem and the Impact of Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Pan, Xunzhang & Ma, Xueqing & Zhang, Yanru & Shao, Tianming & Peng, Tianduo & Li, Xiang & Wang, Lining & Chen, Wenying, 2023. "Implications of carbon neutrality for power sector investments and stranded coal assets in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Bishan Wu, 2024. "Low-carbon development mechanism of energy industry from the perspective of carbon neutralization," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(2), pages 628-643, March.
    12. Zhang, Hongji & Ding, Tao & Sun, Yuge & Huang, Yuhan & He, Yuankang & Huang, Can & Li, Fangxing & Xue, Chen & Sun, Xiaoqiang, 2023. "How does load-side re-electrification help carbon neutrality in energy systems: Cost competitiveness analysis and life-cycle deduction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Zhang, Qian & Cheng, Baodong & Diao, Gang & Tao, Chenlu & Wang, Can, 2023. "Does China's natural forest logging ban affect the stability of the timber import trade network?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    14. Wang, Lin & Zhao, Junsan & Lin, Yilin & Chen, Guoping, 2024. "Exploring ecological carbon sequestration advantage and economic responses in an ecological security pattern: A nature-based solutions perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    15. Longhui Li & Yue Zhang & Tianjun Zhou & Kaicun Wang & Can Wang & Tao Wang & Linwang Yuan & Kangxin An & Chenghu Zhou & Guonian Lü, 2022. "Mitigation of China’s carbon neutrality to global warming," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    16. Jiang, Jiatong & Hu, Bin & Wang, R.Z. & Deng, Na & Cao, Feng & Wang, Chi-Chuan, 2022. "A review and perspective on industry high-temperature heat pumps," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Mengcheng Li & Haimeng Liu & Shangkun Yu & Jianshi Wang & Yi Miao & Chengxin Wang, 2022. "Estimating the Decoupling between Net Carbon Emissions and Construction Land and Its Driving Factors: Evidence from Shandong Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-26, July.
    18. Hui Wen & Yi Li & Zirong Li & Xiaoxue Cai & Fengxia Wang, 2022. "Spatial Differentiation of Carbon Budgets and Carbon Balance Zoning in China Based on the Land Use Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Ogwu Stephen Obinozie & Eze Afamefuna A. & Uzoigwe Joshua C. & Orji Anthony & Maduka Anne Chinonye & Onwe Joshua Chukwuma, 2023. "Global Warming and Atmospheric Carbon: Is Carbon Sequestration a Myth or Reality?," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 28-56, March.
    20. Shiguang Shen & Chengcheng Wu & Zhenyu Gai & Chenjing Fan, 2023. "Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Net Carbon Sink Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors at the City Level in Three Major Urban Agglomerations in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:458-:d:1369799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.