IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i3p278-d1344850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Identifying Influential Factors of Ecosystem Fragmentation in Karst Landscapes: A Comprehensive Analytical Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaopiao Wu

    (School of Geography and Environmental Science/School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Zhongfa Zhou

    (School of Geography and Environmental Science/School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550025, China
    State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China)

  • Meng Zhu

    (School of Geography and Environmental Science/School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Jiale Wang

    (State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550025, China
    State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China)

  • Rongping Liu

    (School of Geography and Environmental Science/School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Jiajia Zheng

    (School of Geography and Environmental Science/School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Jiaxue Wan

    (State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550025, China
    State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China)

Abstract

Guanling-Zhenfeng County, a microcosm of the ecologically fragile karst area in southwest China, experiences rapid population growth and urban expansion which intensifies land use transformation and ecological landscape fragmentation. Exploring the spatiotemporal characteristics of landscape fragmentation and its causes in Guanling-Zhenfeng County is of great significance in maintaining the stability of the ecosystem and ecological protection in karst areas. In this study, a comprehensive landscape fragmentation index (FI), geographic probe, multi-scale geographically weighted regression (MGWR), and PLUS model were used to quantitatively explore the spatiotemporal characteristic heterogeneity, causes, and future scenario projections of landscape fragmentation in Guanling-Zhenfeng County from 2000 to 2020. The results showed that: (1) the distribution of each landscape index was characterized by obvious spatial differentiation. Among them, the spatial distribution trends of patch density (PD) and largest patch index (LPI) were opposite and the distribution trends of Shannon diversity index (SHDI) and Shannon evenness index (SHEI) were similar. There were fewer heterogeneous patches in the study area from 2000 to 2020, and the landscape shape was more regular and less fragmented. (2) The overall landscape fragmentation in Guanling-Zhenfeng County from 2000 to 2020 was dominated by moderate fragmentation, with the smallest percentage of extreme fragmentation, and heavy fragmentation was mainly distributed in the north-central part of the study area. (3) Natural and social factors jointly affect the landscape fragmentation in Guanling-Zhenfeng County, and there is a significant interactive enhancement effect among the factors, with population density being the most important influence factor. In addition, the effects of the factors on landscape fragmentation showed significant spatial non-stationarity. (4) The characteristics of landscape fragmentation changes in Guanling-Zhenfeng County under different scenarios varied significantly, with the largest percentage of increase in heavy landscape fragmentation under the business-as-usual scenario (BAU), the next under the land use planning scenario (LUP), and the smallest under the ecological protection scenario (ESP).

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaopiao Wu & Zhongfa Zhou & Meng Zhu & Jiale Wang & Rongping Liu & Jiajia Zheng & Jiaxue Wan, 2024. "Quantifying Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Identifying Influential Factors of Ecosystem Fragmentation in Karst Landscapes: A Comprehensive Analytical Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:278-:d:1344850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/3/278/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/3/278/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudia Canedoli & Francesco Crocco & Roberto Comolli & Emilio Padoa-Schioppa, 2018. "Landscape fragmentation and urban sprawl in the urban region of Milan," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 632-651, July.
    2. Yue Li & Huacai Geng, 2022. "Evolution of Land Use Landscape Patterns in Karst Watersheds of Guizhou Plateau and Its Ecological Security Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu Han & Yanbo Qu & Shufeng Liang & Luyan Shi & Min Zhang & Haiyan Jia, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Land Ecological Security and Optimization Based on GeoSOS-FLUS Model: A Case Study of the Yellow River Delta in China Toward Sustainability," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Lucia Baldi & Danilo Bertoni & Giuseppina Migliore & Massimo Peri, 2019. "How alternative food networks work in a metropolitan area? An analysis of Solidarity Purchase Groups in Northern Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Hui Xu & Cunyou Chen & Luyun Liu & Qizhen Li & Baojing Wei & Xijun Hu, 2024. "Response of Surface Runoff Evolution to Landscape Patterns in Karst Areas: A Case Study of Yun–Gui Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, August.
    4. Shanshan Wang & Qiting Zuo & Kefa Zhou & Jinlin Wang & Wei Wang, 2023. "Predictions of Land Use/Land Cover Change and Landscape Pattern Analysis in the Lower Reaches of the Tarim River, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Yanlong Guo & Xingmeng Ma & Yelin Zhu & Denghang Chen & Han Zhang, 2023. "Research on Driving Factors of Forest Ecological Security: Evidence from 12 Provincial Administrative Regions in Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Chaolei Yang & Jingyuan Li & Shuwen Jiang & Yufeng Tian & Canfeng Li & Wantao Yang & Haichuan Duan & Zong Wei & Yong Huang, 2024. "The Impacts of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Sonali Sharma & Pawan Kumar Joshi & Christine Fürst, 2022. "Exploring Multiscale Influence of Urban Growth on Landscape Patterns of Two Emerging Urban Centers in the Western Himalaya," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Xvlu Wang & Yingjun Sun & Qinghao Liu & Liguo Zhang, 2023. "Construction and Optimization of Ecological Network Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment: A Case Study in Jinan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Manuel Sánchez-Fernández & Juan Miguel Barrigón Morillas & David Montes González & José Juan de Sanjosé Blasco, 2022. "Impact of Roads on Environmental Protected Areas: Analysis and Comparison of Metrics for Assessing Habitat Fragmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Isra Hyka & Artan Hysa & Sokol Dervishi & Marijana Kapovic Solomun & Alban Kuriqi & Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma & Paul Sestras, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Landscape Transformation in Western Balkans’ Metropolitan Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Yanlong Guo & Peiyu He & Pengyu Chen & Linfu Zhang, 2024. "Ecological Evaluation of Land Resources in the Yangtze River Delta Region by Remote Sensing Observation," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Zhou, Liang & Gong, Yangchun & López-Carr, David & Huang, Chunlin, 2024. "A critical role of the capital green belt in constraining urban sprawl and its fragmentation measurement," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Songlin Zhou & Wei Li & Wei Zhang & Ziyuan Wang, 2023. "The Assessment of the Spatiotemporal Characteristics of the Eco-Environmental Quality in the Chishui River Basin from 2000 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Yu Wang & Hanru Zhou & Yanlong Guo & Linfu Zhang, 2024. "Research on Fuzzy Evaluation of Land Environmental Security in Three Provinces of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Yan Yan & Hui Liu & Canfei He, 2021. "How Does Urban Sprawl Affect Public Health? Evidence from Panel Survey Data in Urbanizing China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:278-:d:1344850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.