IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2204-d1545272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Prediction of Soil Total Phosphorus in a Karst Area: Comparing GWR and Residual-Centered Kriging

Author

Listed:
  • Laimou Lu

    (Key Laboratory of Coupling Process and Effect of Natural Resources Elements, Beijing 100055, China
    Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Ministry of Natural Resources and Guangxi, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China
    Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Analysis and Test Research, Nanning 530022, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Penghui Li

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Ministry of Natural Resources and Guangxi, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China
    International Research Centre on Karst, Under the Auspices of UNESCO, National Center for International Research on Karst Dynamic System and Global Change, Guilin 541004, China
    Collage of Earth Sciences, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Liang Zhong

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Ministry of Natural Resources and Guangxi, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China
    International Research Centre on Karst, Under the Auspices of UNESCO, National Center for International Research on Karst Dynamic System and Global Change, Guilin 541004, China
    Pingguo Guangxi, Karst Ecosystem, National Observation and Research Station, Pingguo 531406, China)

  • Mingbao Luo

    (Agriculture and Rural Affairs Bureau of Mashan, Nanning 530600, China)

  • Liyuan Xing

    (Key Laboratory of Coupling Process and Effect of Natural Resources Elements, Beijing 100055, China)

  • Chunlai Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Ministry of Natural Resources and Guangxi, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China
    International Research Centre on Karst, Under the Auspices of UNESCO, National Center for International Research on Karst Dynamic System and Global Change, Guilin 541004, China
    Pingguo Guangxi, Karst Ecosystem, National Observation and Research Station, Pingguo 531406, China)

Abstract

Accurate soil total phosphorus (TP) prediction is essential to support sustainable agricultural practices and formulate ecological conservation protection policies, particularly in complex karst landscapes with high spatial variability and high phosphorus and cadmium content and interactions, complicating nutrient management. This study uses GIS and geostatistical methods to analyze the spatial distribution, influencing factors, and predictive modeling of soil TP in the karst region of northern Mashan County, Guangxi, China. Using 427 surface soil samples, we developed five predictive models: ordinary kriging (OK), regression kriging (RK) and geographically weighted regression kriging (GWRK) combined with environmental variables such as land uses, soil types, and topographic factors; residual mean-centered kriging (MM_OK), and residual median-centered kriging (MC_OK). Our results indicate that higher TP levels were observed in agricultural lands (paddy fields and dry land, at 766 and 913 mg·kg −1 , respectively) may due to fertilization, while forests and shrublands showed lower TP levels (383 and 686 mg·kg −1 , respectively), reflecting natural phosphorus cycling. The high-value areas of soil TP concentration are in the karst areas in the west and east of the study area, and the low-value area is in the Hongshui River valley in the north of Mashan. The spatial distribution of soil TP is affected by land use, soil type, and topography. The GWRK model exhibited superior accuracy (80.6%), with predicted concentration of TP closely aligning with observed TP values, effectively capturing fine spatial variations, and showing the lowest mean standardized error, average standard error, and mean absolute error. GWRK also achieved the highest R 2 (0.67), demonstrating robust predictive capability. MM_OK and MC_OK models performed well and showed smoother spatial transitions, while the OK model displayed the lowest predictive accuracy (62%). By utilizing spatially adaptive weighting, GWRK and its residual-centered kriging method improve soil TP’s prediction accuracy and smoothness in karst areas, providing a reference for targeted soil conservation and sustainable agricultural practices in spatially complex karst environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Laimou Lu & Penghui Li & Liang Zhong & Mingbao Luo & Liyuan Xing & Chunlai Zhang, 2024. "Spatial Prediction of Soil Total Phosphorus in a Karst Area: Comparing GWR and Residual-Centered Kriging," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2204-:d:1545272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2204/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2204/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaopiao Wu & Zhongfa Zhou & Meng Zhu & Jiale Wang & Rongping Liu & Jiajia Zheng & Jiaxue Wan, 2024. "Quantifying Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Identifying Influential Factors of Ecosystem Fragmentation in Karst Landscapes: A Comprehensive Analytical Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2204-:d:1545272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.