IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1824-d1513005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Public Participation in Watershed Management in Southeast China: An Application of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Daile Zeng

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Boya Chen

    (Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Jingxin Wang

    (School of Management, Yale University, 165 Whitney Ave, New Haven, CT 06511, USA)

  • John L. Innes

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Juliet Lu

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Futao Guo

    (College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Yancun Yan

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Guangyu Wang

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

Abstract

Increasingly, adaptive processes and decentralization are vital aspects of watershed governance. Equitable and sustainable water governance requires an understanding that different societal members have unique relationships with the environment and varying levels of interaction with policymakers. However, the factors facilitating public involvement under centralized governance remain less understood. This study combined the Institutional Analysis and Development framework with ordered probit regression to empirically investigate the determinants of willingness to participate (WTP) and actual participation of the public in integrated watershed management (IWM). Data from 933 valid questionnaires collected across 36 counties in Fujian, China, were used to define stakeholders’ perceptions of IWM. Results show that stakeholders are predominantly willing to participate in watershed conservation, management, or planning (85.9%), while only 32.8% frequently attend related events. Pro-environmental intentions were mainly shaped by interactional capacity—information exposure, interpersonal exchanges, and cross-reach support recognition—while actual participation was influenced by perceived biophysical conditions, rules-in-use, socioeconomic factors, and interactional capacity. Frequent observations of poor forest management practices were correlated with higher behavioral intentions, and socioeconomic dynamics significantly affected self-reported actual participation. Information sharing had the most substantial positive impact on both WTP and actual participation. These findings reinforce the necessity for an integrated and holistic approach to regional watershed resource management that fosters inclusivity and sustainability. This study provides workable insights into the social and institutional factors that shape public participation in watershed governance as it evolves toward decentralization.

Suggested Citation

  • Daile Zeng & Boya Chen & Jingxin Wang & John L. Innes & Juliet Lu & Futao Guo & Yancun Yan & Guangyu Wang, 2024. "Determinants of Public Participation in Watershed Management in Southeast China: An Application of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1824-:d:1513005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1824/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1824/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhen Yu & Qingjian Zhao, 2022. "Research on the Coordinated Governance Mechanism of Cross-Regional and Cross-Basin Ecological Compensation in the Yangtze River Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Pranab Bardhan & Dilip Mookherjee (ed.), 2006. "Decentralization and Local Governance in Developing Countries: A Comparative Perspective," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262524546, April.
    3. Thoker, Irshad Ahmad & Bhat, M. Shafi & Shah, Shamim Ahmad & Lone, Fayaz Ahmad & Jeelani, Peer, 2024. "An appraisal of people's participation in the joint forest management programme in the Kashmir Himalayas," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Hua Qin & Courtney G. Flint, 2017. "Changing Community Variations in Perceptions and Activeness in Response to the Spruce Bark Beetle Outbreak in Alaska," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Sarr, Sait & Hayes, Bunny & DeCaro, Daniel A., 2021. "Applying Ostrom’s Institutional Analysis and Development framework, and design principles for co-production to pollution management in Louisville's Rubbertown, Kentucky," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    6. Kathleen C. Stosch & Richard S. Quilliam & Nils Bunnefeld & David M. Oliver, 2022. "Rapid Characterisation of Stakeholder Networks in Three Catchments Reveals Contrasting Land-Water Management Issues," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Wang, Jinxia & Yang, Yu & Huang, Jikun & Chen, Kevin, 2015. "Information provision, policy support, and farmers’ adaptive responses against drought: An empirical study in the North China Plain," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 275-282.
    8. Xu, Haiyun & Meng, Miao & Zhu, Fangyu & Ding, Qi, 2024. "The role of local officials in promoting public participation during local urban planning processes: Evidence from Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Khorshed Alam, 2013. "Factors affecting public participation in river ecosystem restoration: using the contingent valuation method," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 47(1), pages 223-240, January-J.
    10. Thomas Webler & Seth Tuler, 2021. "Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 503-518, March.
    11. Zhihua Xu & Jingzhu Shan & Jingmei Li & Wensi Zhang, 2020. "Extending the theory of planned behavior to predict public participation behavior in air pollution control: Beijing, China," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(4), pages 669-688, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yubing Fan & Zeng Tang & Seong C. Park, 2019. "Effects of Community Perceptions and Institutional Capacity on Smallholder Farmers’ Responses to Water Scarcity: Evidence from Arid Northwestern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Jean-Marc Bourgeon & Marie-Laure Breuillé, 2023. "Citizen preferences and the architecture of government," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(3), pages 537-585, October.
    3. Xu, Ying & Findlay, Christopher, 2019. "Farmers’ constraints, governmental support and climate change adaptation: Evidence from Guangdong Province, China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), October.
    4. Ying Xu & Christopher Findlay, 2019. "Farmers’ constraints, governmental support and climate change adaptation: evidence from Guangdong Province, China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), pages 866-880, October.
    5. Armand, Alex & Coutts, Alexander & Vicente, Pedro C. & Vilela, Inês, 2023. "Measuring corruption in the field using behavioral games," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    6. Sun, Xiaohua & Ren, Junlin & Wang, Yun, 2022. "The impact of resource taxation on resource curse: Evidence from Chinese resource tax policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Mehmet Serkan Tosun & Serdar Yilmaz, 2010. "Centralization, Decentralization and Conflict in the Middle East and North Africa," Middle East Development Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Raquel Bernal & Adriana Camacho & Carmen Elisa Flórez & Alejandro Gaviria, 2009. "Desarrollo económico: retos y políticas públicas," Documentos CEDE 5269, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    9. Arvate, Paulo Roberto & Figueiredo, Dalila, 2016. "Another argument against negotiated grants: how the bill for local corruption is distributed," Textos para discussão 432, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    10. Pal, Sarmistha & Wahhaj, Zaki, 2017. "Fiscal decentralisation, local institutions and public good provision: evidence from Indonesia," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 383-409.
    11. Seregious Be-ere, 2022. "Decentralization Reforms in Developing Countries Designed to Champion the Interests of Central Politicians and not Grassroots Development," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 38(1), pages 27-49, March.
    12. Amit Bhaduri, 2018. "A macroeconomic perspective on Asian development," WIDER Working Paper Series 91, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Marco Percoco & Michele Giove, 2009. "Multilevel Governance at Work: Evidence from Structural Funds Management in Lombardia, Italy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(3), pages 381-398, June.
    14. Xuefei Ren, 2015. "City power and urban fiscal crises: the USA, China, and India," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 73-81, March.
    15. Yu, Jihai & Zhou, Li-An & Zhu, Guozhong, 2016. "Strategic interaction in political competition: Evidence from spatial effects across Chinese cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 23-37.
    16. Xuefei Ren, 2018. "Governing the Informal: Housing Policies Over Informal Settlements in China, India, and Brazil," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 79-93, January.
    17. Norman V. Loayza & Jamele Rigolini & Oscar Calvo-González, 2014. "More Than You Can Handle: Decentralization and Spending Ability of Peruvian Municipalities," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 56-78, March.
    18. An, Heng & Chen, Yanyan & Luo, Danglun & Zhang, Ting, 2016. "Political uncertainty and corporate investment: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 174-189.
    19. Michael O. Erdiaw‐Kwasie & Khorshed Alam & Enamul Kabir, 2017. "Modelling Corporate Stakeholder Orientation: Does the Relationship Between Stakeholder Background Characteristics and Corporate Social Performance Matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 465-479, May.
    20. Westphal, Nico, 2011. "Political Decentralisation and Local Economic Development: Findings on the pro-poor responsiveness in 5 Cambodian communes," IEE Working Papers 193, Ruhr University Bochum, Institute of Development Research and Development Policy (IEE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1824-:d:1513005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.