IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2105-d1537517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Spatiotemporal Organizational Order of Living Circle Units Based on the Law of Walking Time-Distance Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Jianming Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Fine Art, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Jun Cai

    (School of Architecture and Fine Art, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Xinhai Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Fine Art, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Wansong Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Fine Art, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

Abstract

The unclear time-distance decay law between supply and demand, which makes it difficult to coordinate their fairness, is a key factor in the disordered spatiotemporal development of supply and demand. In order to advance the standardized renewal of living circles with a people-oriented approach, this paper clarifies the time-distance decay law between supply and demand embedded in residents’ walking time-distance distributions and explores the spatiotemporal organizational order of supply and demand in living circle units aligned with this law. First, 24 sets of walking time-distance distribution data, each showing significant distribution differences, were standardized using a mean-based transformation relative to their own time-distance means, resulting in an observable law of relative time-distance distribution. Subsequently, an explanatory mechanism for the relative time-distance distribution was constructed based on the generation and decay effects of the relative time-distance between standard supply and demand. A functional model was fitted and verified, indicating that the decay law of the relative time-distance follows a negative exponential function with a parameter value of 2.08, and the time-distance threshold has a stable twofold relationship with the time-distance mean. Finally, by drawing an analogy between living circle units and the relative time-distance distribution and taking their standards as the mean time-distance, the study explored the layout relationships among living circle units. The spatiotemporal organizational order for same-level units was characterized by “one form where the time-distance mean and threshold serve as the service radius and influence radius, and another where supply and demand are placed at 0.5 times the time-distance mean inside and outside, respectively”. For different-level units, the order featured “one form where the center of the upper-level spatiotemporal unit is located at the four corners of the lower-level units, with a service radius twice that of the lower-level unit. Another form ensures coordination of service radius differences between upper and lower units through a twofold speed relationship in travel modes, guaranteeing relative fairness in travel time consumption for the same type of supply across different levels”. Additionally, an ideal layout pattern for living circle units was proposed, featuring a “snowflake-shaped” facility layout and a “twice-speed” transfer method. The findings suggest that the 15, 10, and 5 min living circle planning is not merely about the availability of services within their time-distance standards, but about ensuring multifaceted accessibility fairness for residents within these standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianming Zhang & Jun Cai & Xinhai Zhang & Wansong Zhang, 2024. "The Spatiotemporal Organizational Order of Living Circle Units Based on the Law of Walking Time-Distance Distributions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2105-:d:1537517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2105/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2105/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tirachini, Alejandro, 2015. "Probability distribution of walking trips and effects of restricting free pedestrian movement on walking distance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 101-110.
    2. Zelin Zhang & Xiaomin Tang & Yun Wang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Intergenerational Equity of Public Open Space in Old Communities: A Case Study of Caoyang New Village in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Chen Chen, 2023. "Discussion on the Optimization Method of Public Service Facility Layout from the Perspective of Spatial Equity: A Study Based on the Central City of Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Yihua Sun & Shixian Luo, 2024. "A Study on the Current Situation of Public Service Facilities’ Layout from the Perspective of 15-Minute Communities—Taking Chengdu of Sichuan Province as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Martínez, L. Miguel & Viegas, José Manuel, 2013. "A new approach to modelling distance-decay functions for accessibility assessment in transport studies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 87-96.
    6. Teixeira, Joao C. & Antunes, Antonio P., 2008. "A hierarchical location model for public facility planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 92-104, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoyong Yin & Yiming Tang & Lei Yuan & Yongjun Ai & Yan Tang, 2024. "Spatial Assets Value Extraction and Integrated Utilization of Old Communities: Case of Central Guangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Jiayue Xun & Min Zhang & Gaofeng Xu & Xinyue Guo, 2024. "Diversity and Influencing Factors of Public Service Facilities in Urban (Suburban) Railway Life Circle—Evidence from Beijing Subway Line S1, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Oshan, Taylor M., 2022. "Spatial Interaction Modeling," OSF Preprints m3ah8, Center for Open Science.
    4. Javier Rubio-Herrero & Jesús Muñuzuri, 2023. "Sparse regression for data-driven deterrence functions in gravity models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 323(1), pages 153-174, April.
    5. Spencer Leitch & Zhiyuan Wei, 2024. "Improving spatial access to healthcare facilities: an integrated approach with spatial analysis and optimization modeling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 1057-1074, October.
    6. Frederik Priem & Philip Stessens & Frank Canters, 2020. "Microsimulation of residential activity for alternative urban development scenarios: A case study on brussels and flemish brabant," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/305003, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Ahuja, Richa & Tiwari, Geetam, 2021. "Evolving term “accessibility” in spatial systems: Contextual evaluation of indicators," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 4-11.
    8. Yang, Xiping & Fang, Zhixiang & Xu, Yang & Yin, Ling & Li, Junyi & Lu, Shiwei, 2019. "Spatial heterogeneity in spatial interaction of human movements—Insights from large-scale mobile positioning data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 29-40.
    9. Mete Suleyman & Cil Zeynel Abidin & Özceylan Eren, 2018. "Location and Coverage Analysis of Bike- Sharing Stations in University Campus," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 80-95, July.
    10. Halás, Marián & Klapka, Pavel & Kladivo, Petr, 2014. "Distance-decay functions for daily travel-to-work flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 107-119.
    11. Likun Wang & Anne Goodchild & Yong Wang, 2018. "The effect of distance on cargo flows: a case study of Chinese imports and their hinterland destinations," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 456-475, September.
    12. Verachtert, Els & Mayeres, Inge & Vermeiren, Karolien & Van der Meulen, Maarten & Vanhulsel, Marlies & Vanderstraeten, Geoffrey & Loris, Isabelle & Mertens, Geert & Engelen, Guy & Poelmans, Lien, 2023. "Mapping regional accessibility of public transport and services in support of spatial planning: A case study in Flanders," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Widener, Michael J. & Horner, Mark W., 2011. "A hierarchical approach to modeling hurricane disaster relief goods distribution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 821-828.
    14. Guerriero, Francesca & Miglionico, Giovanna & Olivito, Filomena, 2016. "Location and reorganization problems: The Calabrian health care system case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 939-954.
    15. Nelson, Hal T. & Wikstrom, Kris & Hass, Samantha & Sarle, Kirsten, 2021. "Half-length and the FACT framework: Distance-decay and citizen opposition to energy facilities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Giannotti, Mariana & Tomasiello, Diego B. & Bittencourt, Taina A., 2022. "The bias in estimating accessibility inequalities using gravity-based metrics," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Oshan, Taylor M., 2020. "The spatial structure debate in spatial interaction modeling: 50 years on," OSF Preprints 42vxn, Center for Open Science.
    18. Chenmei Teng & Poshan Yu & Liwen Liu, 2024. "A cooperative optimization model and enhanced algorithm for guided strategies in emergency mobile facilities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Mark Horner & Michael Widener, 2011. "The effects of transportation network failure on people’s accessibility to hurricane disaster relief goods: a modeling approach and application to a Florida case study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 59(3), pages 1619-1634, December.
    20. Tongtong Li & Xinrui Fang & Jiaqi Zhu & Qianliu Peng & Wenyu Zhao & Xin Fu, 2024. "Horizontal and Vertical Spatial Equity Analysis Based on Accessibility to Living Service Amenities: A Case Study of Xi’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-30, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2105-:d:1537517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.