Author
Listed:
- Qin Li
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)
- Zonghao Chen
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)
- Jingya Cui
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)
- Jiaqi Lin
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)
- Wenlong Li
(School of Urban Economics and Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)
- Yijun Liu
(School of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)
Abstract
Stock renewal is one of the important methods of urban renewal, which focuses on optimizing and reusing existing urban spaces. With the increasing land pressure in present-day China and the need for land to be reclassified, the thinking mode of stock updating has become increasingly important. Beijing symbiotic courtyard is a representative urban renewal model that combines the characteristics of traditional quadrangle dwelling and modern architecture, aiming to achieve the symbiosis of history and modernity. After several years of implementation, the effectiveness of this model has become a matter of concern for all parties involved. Therefore, this paper takes stock renewal as the observation perspective, describing an evaluation for the Beijing symbiotic courtyard model, which contains different types of residents living in particular historical districts. It attempts to propose corresponding strategies, aiming to provide a more comprehensive thinking angle and planning method for the sustainability of stock renewal. In contrast to earlier studies, the proposed methods involve a specific mathematical statistical model called the IPA-KANO model, in addition to other traditional urban renewal methods. For a wide range of problems including historical district evaluation and renewal, the approach leads to potentially less errors than caused by manual operation. This comes from the fact that all the data are collected through survey questionnaires and big data, so the technical restriction of using mathematical model is to some extent ruled out in this new approach. Moreover, the approach offers new potential problems that cannot be handled using earlier techniques. After the calculation, although there are still defects, local residents are generally satisfied with the Beijing symbiotic courtyard model. The result suggests that it is of importance to reference this model for urban renewal so that can be widely promoted in historical district vitality regeneration.
Suggested Citation
Qin Li & Zonghao Chen & Jingya Cui & Jiaqi Lin & Wenlong Li & Yijun Liu, 2024.
"Beijing Symbiotic Courtyard Model’s Post Evaluation from the Perspective of Stock Renewal,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6112-:d:1437237
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Ling Yang & Jian Li & Hsiao-Tung Chang & Zhiqing Zhao & He Ma & Libin Zhou, 2023.
"A Generative Urban Space Design Method Based on Shape Grammar and Urban Induction Patterns,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
- Zixuan Zhang & Junchen Pan & Yun Qian, 2023.
"Collaborative Governance for Participatory Regeneration Practices in Old Residential Communities within the Chinese Context: Cases from Beijing,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, July.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Xiaoyong Yin & Yiming Tang & Lei Yuan & Yongjun Ai & Yan Tang, 2024.
"Spatial Assets Value Extraction and Integrated Utilization of Old Communities: Case of Central Guangzhou, China,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, October.
- Han Wang & Yueli Xu, 2024.
"Achieving Neighborhood-Level Collaborative Governance through Participatory Regeneration: Cases of Three Residential Heritage Neighborhoods in Shanghai,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, March.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6112-:d:1437237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.