IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i10p1647-d1495138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid Appraisal of Wildlife Corridor Viability with Geospatial Modelling and Field Data: Lessons from Makuyuni, Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel H. Lyimo

    (College of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Moshi P.O. Box 3031, Tanzania)

  • Gabriel Mayengo

    (College of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Moshi P.O. Box 3031, Tanzania)

  • Kwaslema M. Hariohay

    (College of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Moshi P.O. Box 3031, Tanzania)

  • Joseph Holler

    (Department of Geography, Middlebury College, McCardell Bicentennial Hall, 287 Bicentennial Way, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA)

  • Alex Kisingo

    (College of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Moshi P.O. Box 3031, Tanzania)

  • David J. Castico

    (Tanzania People and Wildlife, Arusha P.O. Box 11306, Tanzania)

  • Niwaeli E. Kimambo

    (Department of Geography, Middlebury College, McCardell Bicentennial Hall, 287 Bicentennial Way, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA)

  • Justin Lucas

    (Department of Geography, Middlebury College, McCardell Bicentennial Hall, 287 Bicentennial Way, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA)

  • Emanuel H. Martin

    (College of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Moshi P.O. Box 3031, Tanzania)

  • Damian Nguma

    (Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, Arusha P.O. Box 661, Tanzania)

Abstract

Connectivity between protected areas is necessary to prevent habitat fragmentation. Biodiverse countries like Tanzania craft legislation to promote habitat connectivity via the creation of ecological corridors, but their viability for wildlife often remains unknown. We therefore develop a scalable and replicable approach to assess and monitor multispecies corridor viability using geospatial modeling and field data. We apply and test the approach in the Makuyuni study area: an unprotected ecological corridor connecting Tarangire National Park to Essmingor mountain, Makuyuni Wildlife Park and Mto Wa Mbu Game Controlled Area. We analyzed the viability of Makuyuni as an ecological corridor by creating and validating a geospatial least-cost corridor model with field observations of wildlife and livestock. We created the model from publicly available spatial datasets augmented with manual digitization of pastoral homesteads ( bomas ). The least-cost corridor model identified two likely pathways for wildlife, confirmed and validated with field observations. Locations with low least-cost values were significantly correlated with more wildlife observations (Spearman’s rho = −0.448, p = 0.002). Our findings suggest that Makuyuni is a viable ecological corridor threatened by development and land use change. Our methodology presents a replicable approach for both monitoring Makuyuni and assessing corridor viability more generally. The incorporation of manually digitized homesteads ( bomas ) and field-based livestock observations makes corridor assessment more robust by taking into account pastoral land uses that are often missing in land cover maps. Integration of geospatial analysis and field observations is key for the robust identification of corridors for habitat connectivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel H. Lyimo & Gabriel Mayengo & Kwaslema M. Hariohay & Joseph Holler & Alex Kisingo & David J. Castico & Niwaeli E. Kimambo & Justin Lucas & Emanuel H. Martin & Damian Nguma, 2024. "Rapid Appraisal of Wildlife Corridor Viability with Geospatial Modelling and Field Data: Lessons from Makuyuni, Tanzania," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:1647-:d:1495138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/10/1647/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/10/1647/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard P. Cincotta & Jennifer Wisnewski & Robert Engelman, 2000. "Human population in the biodiversity hotspots," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6781), pages 990-992, April.
    2. Ana Andries & Richard J. Murphy & Stephen Morse & Jim Lynch, 2021. "Earth Observation for Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification within Environmental Land Management Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-34, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaiswal, Sreeja & Balietti, Anca & Schäffer, Daniel, 2023. "Environmental Protection and Labor Market Composition," Working Papers 0736, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    2. Fisher, Brendan & Christopher, Treg, 2007. "Poverty and biodiversity: Measuring the overlap of human poverty and the biodiversity hotspots," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 93-101, April.
    3. Johnston, Robert J. & Ramachandran, Mahesh & Schultz, Eric T. & Segerson, Kathleen & Besedin, Elena Y., 2011. "Characterizing Spatial Pattern in Ecosystem Service Values when Distance Decay Doesn’t Apply: Choice Experiments and Local Indicators of Spatial Association," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103374, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Irena Medar-Tanjga & Neda Živak & Anđelija Ivkov-Džigurski & Vesna Rajčević & Tanja Mišlicki Tomić & Vukosava Čolić, 2022. "Drina Transboundary Biosphere Reserve—Opportunities and Challenges of Sustainable Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Waleed Abbas & Islam Hamdi, 2022. "Satellite-Based Discrimination of Urban Dynamics-Induced Local Bias from Day/Night Temperature Trends across the Nile Delta, Egypt: A Basis for Climate Change Impacts Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Sara T Borgström, 2009. "Patterns and Challenges of Urban Nature Conservation—A Study of Southern Sweden," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(11), pages 2671-2685, November.
    7. Caitlin Cunningham & Karen F. Beazley, 2018. "Changes in Human Population Density and Protected Areas in Terrestrial Global Biodiversity Hotspots, 1995–2015," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Parkhurst, Gregory M. & Shogren, Jason F., 2007. "Spatial incentives to coordinate contiguous habitat," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 344-355, December.
    9. Tang, Xiaoyu & Huang, Yue & Pan, Xiaohui & Liu, Tie & Ling, Yunan & Peng, Jiabin, 2024. "Managing the water-agriculture-environment-energy nexus: Trade-offs and synergies in an arid area of Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    10. Christina Breed & Helge Mehrtens, 2021. "Using “Live” Public Sector Projects in Design Teaching to Transform Urban Green Infrastructure in South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Xiaoqian Sun & Sebastian Wandelt & Mark Hansen, 2020. "Airport Road Access at Planet Scale using Population Grid and Openstreetmap," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 273-299, March.
    12. Hopper, Stephen D., 2010. "Sir John Crawford Memorial Address: Plant Diversity at the Turning Point," 2010: Biodiversity and World Food Security: Nourishing the Planet and Its People, 30 August-1 September 2010 125259, Crawford Fund.
    13. Snyder, Brian, 2008. "How to reach a compromise on drilling in AWNR," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 937-939, March.
    14. Jonathan O. Hernandez & Inocencio E. Buot & Byung Bae Park, 2022. "Prioritizing Choices in the Conservation of Flora and Fauna: Research Trends and Methodological Approaches," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Mathew E. Hauer & Carl P. Schmertmann, 2020. "Population Pyramids Yield Accurate Estimates of Total Fertility Rates," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(1), pages 221-241, February.
    16. Robert Johnston & Mahesh Ramachandran, 2014. "Modeling Spatial Patchiness and Hot Spots in Stated Preference Willingness to Pay," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(3), pages 363-387, November.
    17. López-Carr, David & Davis, Jason & Jankowska, Marta M. & Grant, Laura & López-Carr, Anna Carla & Clark, Matthew, 2012. "Space versus place in complex human–natural systems: Spatial and multi-level models of tropical land use and cover change (LUCC) in Guatemala," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 64-75.
    18. Meng Xu & Joel E Cohen, 2019. "Analyzing and interpreting spatial and temporal variability of the United States county population distributions using Taylor's law," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Monika Egerer & Kevin Li & Theresa Wei Ying Ong, 2018. "Context Matters: Contrasting Ladybird Beetle Responses to Urban Environments across Two US Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Oliver Okey Oji Enuoh & Francis E. Bisong, 2014. "Global Sustainable Development Agenda: An Implication for Conservation Challenges in Cross River State, Nigeria," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 211-211, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:1647-:d:1495138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.