IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v404y2000i6781d10.1038_35010105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human population in the biodiversity hotspots

Author

Listed:
  • Richard P. Cincotta

    (Population Action International)

  • Jennifer Wisnewski

    (Population Action International)

  • Robert Engelman

    (Population Action International)

Abstract

Biologists have identified 25 areas, called biodiversity hotspots, that are especially rich in endemic species and particularly threatened by human activities. The human population dynamics of these areas, however, are not well quantified. Here we report estimates of key demographic variables for each hotspot, and for three extensive tropical forest areas1 that are less immediately threatened. We estimate that in 1995 more than 1.1 billion people, nearly 20% of world population, were living within the hotspots, an area covering about 12% of Earth's terrestrial surface. We estimate that the population growth rate in the hotspots (1995–2000) is 1.8%?yr-1, substantially higher than the population growth rate of the world as a whole (1.3%?yr-1) and above that of the developing countries (1.6%?yr-1). These results suggest that substantial human-induced environmental changes are likely to continue in the hotspots and that demographic change remains an important factor in global biodiversity conservation. The results also underline the potential conservation significance of the continuing worldwide declines in human fertility and of policies and programs that influence human migration.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard P. Cincotta & Jennifer Wisnewski & Robert Engelman, 2000. "Human population in the biodiversity hotspots," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6781), pages 990-992, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:404:y:2000:i:6781:d:10.1038_35010105
    DOI: 10.1038/35010105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35010105
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35010105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:404:y:2000:i:6781:d:10.1038_35010105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.