IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i5p1053-d1145132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Regional Integration Strategies on the Formation of City Regions and Its Agglomeration Shadow: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanlin Zhen

    (Spatial Planning Center, Yangtze Delta Region Institute of Tsinghua University, Jiaxing 314006, China)

  • Dehao Shi

    (Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China)

  • Yanan Lu

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China)

Abstract

Using a sample of 122 county-level units in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region from 2000 to 2017, this study employs a difference-in-differences model (DID) to examine the impact of regional integration strategy (RIS) on city-region formation and a difference-in-difference-in-difference model (DDD) to test whether it has spatial heterogeneity. The results indicate that RIS has a significant positive impact on industrial integration while it also displays obvious industrial heterogeneity and spatial heterogeneity. The results of the present study contribute to the following points: First, the implementation of RIS promotes a balanced layout of the secondary industry in the region, yet the tertiary industry tends to agglomerate towards central cities. Furthermore, we found that RIS has a more significant negative effect on the integration of the secondary industry and tertiary industry in cities adjacent to metropolis. Consequently, RIS magnifies the “agglomeration shadow” within city regions in terms of industrial integration. Last, our in-depth fieldwork on Jiaxing unravels the mechanism of the shadow effect of RIS.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanlin Zhen & Dehao Shi & Yanan Lu, 2023. "The Impact of Regional Integration Strategies on the Formation of City Regions and Its Agglomeration Shadow: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1053-:d:1145132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1053/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1053/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Harrison, 2007. "From competitive regions to competitive city-regions: a new orthodoxy, but some old mistakes," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 311-332, May.
    2. Rodrigo V. Cardoso, 2016. "Overcoming barriers to institutional integration in European second-tier urban regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 2197-2216, December.
    3. George Lin, 2009. "Scaling-up Regional Development in Globalizing China: Local Capital Accumulation, Land-centred Politics, and Reproduction of Space," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 429-447.
    4. Yi Li & Feng Yuan, 2022. "Business-promoted city-regionalism? New Industrial City projects by China Fortune Land Development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 355-370, March.
    5. Roberta Capello, 2000. "The City Network Paradigm: Measuring Urban Network Externalities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(11), pages 1925-1945, October.
    6. Kati Volgmann & Karsten Rusche, 2020. "The Geography of Borrowing Size: Exploring Spatial Distributions for German Urban Regions," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(1), pages 60-79, February.
    7. P. J. Taylor & D. M. Evans & K. Pain, 2008. "Application of the Interlocking Network Model to Mega-City-Regions: Measuring Polycentricity Within and Beyond City-Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 1079-1093.
    8. Masahisa Fujita & Paul Krugman & Anthony J. Venables, 2001. "The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262561476, April.
    9. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    10. Clemens de Olde & Stijn Oosterlynck, 2021. "Taking Implementation Seriously in the Evaluation of Urban Growth Management Strategies: “Safeguarding the Future” of the Antwerp City-Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    11. N. A. Phelps & R. J. Fallon & C. L. Williams, 2001. "Small Firms, Borrowed Size and the Urban-Rural Shift," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(7), pages 613-624.
    12. John Harrison & Michael Hoyler, 2014. "Governing the new metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2249-2266, August.
    13. Yi Li & Fulong Wu, 2018. "Understanding city-regionalism in China: regional cooperation in the Yangtze River Delta," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 313-324, March.
    14. Xu Zhang & Robert C. Kloosterman, 2016. "Connecting the 'Workshop of the World': Intra- and Extra-Service Networks of the Pearl River Delta City-Region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(6), pages 1069-1081, June.
    15. Xianchun Zhang & Jianfa Shen & Yi Sun & Changchang Zhou & Yu Yang, 2023. "Formation of City Regions from Bottom-up Initiatives: Investigating Coalitional Developmentalism in the Pearl River Delta," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(3), pages 700-716, March.
    16. David Beel & Martin Jones, 2021. "City region limits: Questioning city-centric growth narratives in medium-sized cities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(1), pages 3-21, February.
    17. Andrew E.G. Jonas & Kevin Ward, 2007. "Introduction to a Debate on City‐Regions: New Geographies of Governance, Democracy and Social Reproduction," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 169-178, March.
    18. Li, Lei & Ma, Shaojun & Zheng, Yilin & Xiao, Xinyue, 2022. "Integrated regional development: Comparison of urban agglomeration policies in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Caio Porto de Castro & Gervásio Ferreira dos Santos & Anderson Dias de Freitas & Maria Isabel dos Santos & Roberto Fernandes Silva Andrade & Maurício Lima Barreto, 2020. "Socio-economic urban scaling properties: Influence of regional geographic heterogeneities in Brazil," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Kevin Ward & Andrew E G Jonas, 2004. "Competitive City-Regionalism as a Politics of Space: A Critical Reinterpretation of the New Regionalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(12), pages 2119-2139, December.
    21. John B Parr, 2002. "Agglomeration Economies: Ambiguities and Confusions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(4), pages 717-731, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pan, An & Cao, Xuekang, 2024. "Pilot free trade zones and low-carbon innovation: Evidence from listed companies in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Xiaolan & Wang, Rui & Guo, Dongmei & Sun, Weizeng, 2020. "The reconfiguration effect of China's high-speed railway on intercity connection ——A study based on media attention index," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 47-56.
    2. Wenfang Fu & Chuanjian Luo & Modan Yan, 2023. "Does Urban Agglomeration Promote the Development of Cities? Evidence from the Urban Network Externalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Wenfang Fu & Chuanjian Luo & Shan He, 2022. "Does Urban Agglomeration Promote the Development of Cities? An Empirical Analysis Based on Spatial Econometrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Jinliang Jiang & Zhensheng Xu & Jiayi Lu & Dongqi Sun, 2022. "Does Network Externality of Urban Agglomeration Benefit Urban Economic Growth—A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Fulong Wu, 2016. "China's Emergent City-Region Governance: A New Form of State Spatial Selectivity through State-orchestrated Rescaling," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1134-1151, November.
    6. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2016. "Static vs. dynamic agglomeration economies. Spatial context and structural evolution behind urban growth," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 133-158, March.
    7. Cutrini, Eleonora & Mendez, Carlos, 2023. "Convergence clubs and spatial structural change in the European Union," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 167-181.
    8. Benoit, Florence & Belderbos, René, 2024. "International connection, local disconnection: The (heterogeneous) role of global cities in local and global innovation networks," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    9. Koen Frenken & Frank G. van Oort & Thijs Verburg & Ron A. Boschma, 2004. "Variety and regional economic growth in the Netherlands," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0502, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Dec 2004.
    10. Robert Huggins & Nick Clifton, 2011. "Competitiveness, Creativity, and Place-Based Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(6), pages 1341-1362, June.
    11. Jianyi Li & Douglas Webster & Jianming Cai & Larissa Muller, 2019. "Innovation Clusters Revisited: On Dimensions of Agglomeration, Institution, and Built-Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Edward L. Glaeser & Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto & Yimei Zou, 2016. "Urban networks: Connecting markets, people, and ideas," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 17-59, March.
    13. David Waite & Gillian Bristow, 2019. "Spaces of city-regionalism: Conceptualising pluralism in policymaking," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(4), pages 689-706, June.
    14. Mario Polèse & Richard Shearmur, 2006. "Growth and Location of Economic Activity: The Spatial Dynamics of Industries in Canada 1971–2001," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 362-395, September.
    15. Dan He & Zhijing Sun & Peng Gao, 2019. "Development of Economic Integration in the Central Yangtze River Megaregion from the Perspective of Urban Network Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Harrison, John, 2012. "Towards the new "regional world"?," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Growe, Anna & Heider, Katharina & Lamker, Christian & Paßlick, Sandra & Terfrüchte, Thomas (ed.), Polyzentrale Stadtregionen - Die Region als planerischer Handlungsraum, volume 3, pages 10-21, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    17. Xiaoxia Gong & Fanglei Zhong, 2021. "The Impact of Borrowing Size on the Economic Development of Small and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello, 2015. "Second-Rank City Dynamics: Theoretical Interpretations Behind Their Growth Potentials," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 1041-1053, June.
    19. Michael Buser, 2014. "Democratic Accountability and Metropolitan Governance: The Case of South Hampshire, UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2336-2353, August.
    20. Weikai Wang & Ya Ping Wang & Keith Kintrea, 2020. "The (Re)Making of Polycentricity in China's Planning Discourse: The Case of Tianjin," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 857-875, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1053-:d:1145132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.