IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i3p642-d1091562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ascertaining the Knowledge of the General Public and Stakeholders in the Forestry Sector to Invasive Alien Species—A Pan-European Study

Author

Listed:
  • Flavius Bălăcenoiu

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, Eroilor Avenue 128, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Anže Japelj

    (Slovenian Forestry Institute, Večna pot 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Iris Bernardinelli

    (Plant Health and Research Service—ERSA, Via Sabbatini 5, 33050 Pozzuolo Del Friuli, Italy)

  • Bastien Castagneyrol

    (BIOGECO, INRAE, University Bordeaux, 33612 Cestas, France)

  • György Csóka

    (Department of Forest Protection, Forest Research Institute, University of Sopron, 18 Hegyalja Str., 3232 Mátrafüred, Hungary)

  • Milka Glavendekić

    (University of Belgrade-Faculty of Forestry, Str. Kneza Viseslava 1, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Gernot Hoch

    (Department for Forest Protection, BFW—Austrian Research Centre for Forests, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, 1131 Vienna, Austria)

  • Boris Hrasovec

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, Svetosimunska cesta 23, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Silvija Krajter Ostoić

    (Croatian Forest Research Institute, Cvjetno naselje 41, 10450 Jastrebarsko, Croatia)

  • Marton Paulin

    (Department of Forest Protection, Forest Research Institute, University of Sopron, 18 Hegyalja Str., 3232 Mátrafüred, Hungary)

  • David Williams

    (Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham GU10 4LH, UK)

  • Johan Witters

    (Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Burg. Van Gansberghelaan 96, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium)

  • Maarten de Groot

    (Slovenian Forestry Institute, Večna pot 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Against the background of the phenomenon of globalisation, which has increasingly intensified in recent decades, invasive alien species (IAS) have led to biological invasions that have resulted in multiple negative effects on economies, human health, and especially on the environment. In order to control invasive alien species, preventive actions are considered the most effective methods. In this context, society can actively participate in the process of early detection and preventing the spread of these organisms, but there is a need to raise public awareness. In order for this process to take place in the most efficient way, it is necessary to initially evaluate the knowledge of the general public to IAS. Through a questionnaire that was circulated in ten European countries and had over two thousand respondents, this study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge of some stakeholders in the forestry sector regarding IAS. The results showed that a vast majority of respondents who participated in the study had heard about IAS and provided a correct definition of these organisms. Most of the respondents in this study heard for the first time about IAS from school, the Internet, or journal articles. Data analysis also showed that stakeholders in the forestry sector (foresters, forest owners, and members of environmental NGOs) were more likely than the other respondents to be aware of the impact of IAS. The results of this study offer an insight to researchers and decision makers assessing the differences of opinion regarding invasive alien species, and the necessary steps that could be adopted in the process of raising awareness in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Flavius Bălăcenoiu & Anže Japelj & Iris Bernardinelli & Bastien Castagneyrol & György Csóka & Milka Glavendekić & Gernot Hoch & Boris Hrasovec & Silvija Krajter Ostoić & Marton Paulin & David Williams, 2023. "Ascertaining the Knowledge of the General Public and Stakeholders in the Forestry Sector to Invasive Alien Species—A Pan-European Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:642-:d:1091562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/3/642/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/3/642/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lovell, Sabrina J. & Stone, Susan F. & Fernandez, Linda, 2006. "The Economic Impacts of Aquatic Invasive Species: A Review of the Literature," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 35(1), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Lovell, Sabrina J. & Stone, Susan F. & Fernandez, Linda, 2006. "The Economic Impacts of Aquatic Invasive Species: A Review of the Literature," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 195-208, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Marbuah & Ing-Marie Gren & Kristina Tattersdill & Brendan G. McKie, 2019. "Management of an Aquatic Invasive Weed with Uncertain Benefits and Damage Costs: The Case of Elodea Canadensis in Sweden," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Eli Fenichel & Timothy Richards & David Shanafelt, 2014. "The Control of Invasive Species on Private Property with Neighbor-to-Neighbor Spillovers," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(2), pages 231-255, October.
    3. Warziniack, Travis W. & Finnoff, David & Shogren, Jason F., 2013. "Public economics of hitchhiking species and tourism-based risk to ecosystem services," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 277-294.
    4. David Simpson, 2008. "Preventing Biological Invasions: Doing Something vs. Doing Nothing," NCEE Working Paper Series 200811, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Nov 2008.
    5. Horsch, Eric J. & Lewis, David J., 2008. "The Effects of Aquatic Invasive Species on Property Values: Evidence from a Quasi-Random Experiment," Staff Papers 92216, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    6. Rajakaruna, Harshana & Potapov, Alexei & Lewis, Mark, 2013. "Impact of stochasticity in immigration and reintroduction on colonizing and extirpating populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 38-48.
    7. Zhang, Congwen & Boyle, Kevin J., 2010. "The effect of an aquatic invasive species (Eurasian watermilfoil) on lakefront property values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 394-404, December.
    8. Zhaojun Wang & Duy Nong & Amanda M. Countryman & James J. Corbett & Travis Warziniack, 2020. "Potential impacts of ballast water regulations on international trade, shipping patterns, and the global economy: An integrated transportation and economic modeling assessment," Papers 2008.11334, arXiv.org.
    9. Anna Occhipinti-Ambrogi, 2021. "Biopollution by Invasive Marine Non-Indigenous Species: A Review of Potential Adverse Ecological Effects in a Changing Climate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Heidi Tuhkanen & Evelin Urbel-Piirsalu & Tea Nõmmann & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Nick Hanley, 2015. "Valuing the benefits of improved marine environmental quality under multiple stressors," Working Papers 2015-41, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    11. Olson, Lars J., 2006. "The Economics of Terrestrial Invasive Species: A Review of the Literature," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 178-194, April.
    12. Kyo Soung Koo & Soorim Song & Jae Hyeok Choi & Ha-Cheol Sung, 2020. "Current Distribution and Status of Non-Native Freshwater Turtles in the Wild, Republic of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-10, May.
    13. Oleg Sheremet & John R. Healey & Christopher P. Quine & Nick Hanley, 2017. "Public Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Forest Disease Control in the UK," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 781-800, September.
    14. Stoeckl, Natalie & Dodd, Aaron & Kompas, Tom, 2023. "The monetary value of 16 services protected by the Australian National Biosecurity System: Spatially explicit estimates and vulnerability to incursions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    15. Eric J. Horsch & David J. Lewis, 2009. "The Effects of Aquatic Invasive Species on Property Values: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 85(3), pages 391-409.
    16. Eyyüb Y. Kıbış & İ. Esra Büyüktahtakın & Robert G. Haight & Najmaddin Akhundov & Kathleen Knight & Charles E. Flower, 2021. "A Multistage Stochastic Programming Approach to the Optimal Surveillance and Control of the Emerald Ash Borer in Cities," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 808-834, May.
    17. Haight, Robert G. & Polasky, Stephen, 2010. "Optimal control of an invasive species with imperfect information about the level of infestation," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 519-533, November.
    18. D. M. N. S. Dissanayaka & S. S. Udumann & D. K. R. P. L. Dissanayake & T. D. Nuwarapaksha & Anjana J. Atapattu, 2023. "Review on Aquatic Weeds as Potential Source for Compost Production to Meet Sustainable Plant Nutrient Management Needs," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Alisha D Davidson & Chad L Hewitt & Donna R Kashian, 2015. "Understanding Acceptable Level of Risk: Incorporating the Economic Cost of Under-Managing Invasive Species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    20. Michael-Bitton, Geula & Gal, Gideon & Corrales, Xavier & Ofir, Eyal & Shechter, Mordechai & Zemah-Shamir, Shiri, 2022. "Economic aspects of fish stock accounting as a renewable marine natural capital: The Eastern Mediterranean continental shelf ecosystem as a case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:642-:d:1091562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.