IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1568-d914864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Multidimensional Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Regeneration Projects: A Proposal for Integrating Level(s) Tool—The Case Study of Villa Vannucchi in San Giorgio a Cremano (Italy)

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Nocca

    (Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, 80134 Naples, Italy)

  • Mariarosaria Angrisano

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Pegaso Telematic University, 80143 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

The challenges of sustainable development are mainly concentrated in the cities. Therefore, they represent a key place for implementing strategies and actions to achieve (or not achieve) sustainable development objectives. In this perspective, the circular city model represents a new way of organizing the city. As demonstrated by a variety of best practices, the entry points for triggering circular processes at the urban scale are various. In this paper, cultural heritage is presented as the entry point for the implementation of this new urban development model. The focus here is on the implementation tools, with a particular emphasis on the evaluation tools for assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of this model, that is, the multidimensional benefits that it can produce. The Level(s) tool, proposed by the European Commission in 2017, is the only officially recognised assessment tool related to the circular economy at the European level. It aims to evaluate the performance of new buildings from a circular economy perspective. This paper intends to expand the field of action of the aforementioned tool to projects related to cultural heritage. Nevertheless, the Level(s) tool has some weaknesses in relation to values and attributes that need to be considered when dealing with cultural heritage. This paper proposes an evaluation framework for assessing cultural heritage renovation and reuse projects, considering all its values and the multidimensional impacts that they are able to produce (economic, social, environmental impacts) in the city. The starting point for the development of the proposed evaluation framework is the Level(s) tool by the European Commission. On the basis of critical considerations, this tool is integrated with criteria and indicators deduced from other previous studies and other official tools on this issue (Green Building Council and Heritage Impact Assessment tools). The evaluation framework is here tested to evaluate the renovation/reuse project of Villa Vannucchi, a historic building located in the city of San Giorgio a Cremano in the metropolitan city of Naples (Italy).

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Nocca & Mariarosaria Angrisano, 2022. "The Multidimensional Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Regeneration Projects: A Proposal for Integrating Level(s) Tool—The Case Study of Villa Vannucchi in San Giorgio a Cremano (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1568-:d:914864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1568/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1568/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baharak Ashrafi & Carola Neugebauer & Michael Kloos, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework for Heritage Impact Assessment: A Review and Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Chantrelle, Fanny Pernodet & Lahmidi, Hicham & Keilholz, Werner & Mankibi, Mohamed El & Michel, Pierre, 2011. "Development of a multicriteria tool for optimizing the renovation of buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1386-1394, April.
    3. Throsby,David, 2010. "The Economics of Cultural Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521868259, September.
    4. Peter Howley & Mark Scott & Declan Redmond, 2008. "Sustainability versus Liveability: An Investigation of Neighbourhood Satisfaction," Working Papers 0821, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    5. Luigi Fusco Girard & Francesca Nocca, 2019. "Moving Towards the Circular Economy/City Model: Which Tools for Operationalizing This Model?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-48, November.
    6. Francesca Nocca, 2017. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, October.
    7. Verena Göswein & Carla Rodrigues & José D. Silvestre & Fausto Freire & Guillaume Habert & Jakob König, 2020. "Using anticipatory life cycle assessment to enable future sustainable construction," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(1), pages 178-192, February.
    8. R.M. Ball, 2002. "Re use potential and vacant industrial premises: revisiting the regeneration issue in Stoke-on-Trent," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 93-110, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefania De Medici & Pasquale De Toro & Francesca Nocca, 2019. "Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development: Impact Assessment of Two Adaptive Reuse Projects in Siracusa, Sicily," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Alessandra Bianchi & Stefania De Medici, 2023. "A Sustainable Adaptive Reuse Management Model for Disused Railway Cultural Heritage to Boost Local and Regional Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-34, March.
    3. Martina Bosone & Francesca Ciampa, 2021. "Human-Centred Indicators (HCI) to Regenerate Vulnerable Cultural Heritage and Landscape towards a Circular City: From the Bronx (NY) to Ercolano (IT)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-36, May.
    4. Ozbugday, Fatih Cemil, 2019. "Kültür ve Ekonomik Başarı [Culture and Economic Success]," MPRA Paper 96734, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Alfiya R. Alikberova, 2015. "Academic Expansion of Peoples’ Republic of China on the Example of Confucius Institutes Functioning in Russian Federation," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(4), pages 1-32, April.
    6. YAMADA Keigo, 2024. "Literature Review of Cultural Heritage Economics - Focus on theoretical research of built heritage - (Japanese)," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 24014, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    7. Terry Flew & Agata Stepnik, 2024. "The Value of News: Aligning Economic and Social Value From an Institutional Perspective," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    8. Federico Cuomo & Stefania Ravazzi & Federico Savini & Luca Bertolini, 2020. "Transformative Urban Living Labs: Towards a Circular Economy in Amsterdam and Turin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Andréa Jean Baker, 2017. "Algorithms to Assess Music Cities," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, March.
    10. Alessio D’Auria & Pasquale De Toro & Nicola Fierro & Elisa Montone, 2018. "Integration between GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ecosystem Services Assessment: A Methodological Proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    11. Carlos Smaniotto Costa & Marluci Menezes & Petja Ivanova-Radovanova & Tatiana Ruchinskaya & Konstantinos Lalenis & Monica Bocci, 2021. "Planning Perspectives and Approaches for Activating Underground Built Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Bertacchini, Enrico & Dalle Nogare, Chiara, 2014. "Public provision vs. outsourcing of cultural services: Evidence from Italian cities," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 168-182.
    13. Sierra-Pérez, Jorge & Rodríguez-Soria, Beatriz & Boschmonart-Rives, Jesús & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2018. "Integrated life cycle assessment and thermodynamic simulation of a public building’s envelope renovation: Conventional vs. Passivhaus proposal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1510-1521.
    14. Paul Dalziel, 2019. "Wellbeing economics in public policy: A distinctive Australasian contribution?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 478-497, December.
    15. Castiglione, Concetta & Infante, Davide & Zieba, Marta, 2023. "Public support for performing arts. Efficiency and productivity gains in eleven European countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Joris Van Doorsselaere, 2021. "Connecting Sustainable Development and Heritage Education? An Analysis of the Curriculum Reform in Flemish Public Secondary Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Antonello Monsù Scolaro & Stefania De Medici, 2021. "Downcycling and Upcycling in Rehabilitation and Adaptive Reuse of Pre-Existing Buildings: Re-Designing Technological Performances in an Environmental Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    18. Roberta Ingaramo & Luca Pascale, 2020. "An Interpretative Matrix for an Adaptive Design Approach. Italian School Infrastructure: Safety and Social Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    19. Cristina Baglivo & Paolo Maria Congedo & Matteo Di Cataldo & Luigi Damiano Coluccia & Delia D’Agostino, 2017. "Envelope Design Optimization by Thermal Modelling of a Building in a Warm Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-34, November.
    20. Costa, Andrea & Keane, Marcus M. & Torrens, J. Ignacio & Corry, Edward, 2013. "Building operation and energy performance: Monitoring, analysis and optimisation toolkit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 310-316.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1568-:d:914864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.