IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1545-d912918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Services Value in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Based on Scarcity Modification of Spatiotemporal Supply–Demand Influence

Author

Listed:
  • Xiumei Tang

    (Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Key Laboratory of Agri-Informatics, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China)

  • Yu Liu

    (Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Key Laboratory of Agri-Informatics, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China)

  • Yanmin Ren

    (Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Key Laboratory of Agri-Informatics, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China)

  • Huiyi Feng

    (School of Land Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

It is of great significance to study the spatiotemporal differences between supply and demand of regional ecosystem services (ES) and evaluate the dynamic impact of changes in supply and demand on the ecosystem services value (ESV) so as to provide scientific guidance for human activities and maintain healthy ecosystem development. This study proposes a novel method to calculate the scarcity value of ecosystem service (SESV) as a function of the temporal and spatial changes in supply and demand to divided ecological zones with differentiated land-use strategies. Then, it explores the changes in ESV and SESV in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region from 2000 to 2015. Firstly, the native ecosystem services value (NESV) and demand of ES in the BTH region were evaluated. Secondly, the spatiotemporal influence mechanism of supply and demand on ESV was analyzed according to the equilibrium price principle of supply and demand in economics, and a model for evaluating the SESV was constructed on the basis of supply and demand. Lastly, the ecological zoning method was proposed for of the BTH region. Result shows that the NESV in the BTH region was 2775.54 billion CNY in 2000, and it decreased to 2722.44 billion CNY in 2015. Taking into account the changes in supply and demand, the SESV in 2015 was 2884.85 billion CNY. Secondly, the NESV in 2000 and 2015 and the SESV in 2015 exhibited a gradual downward trend from north to south. Lastly, according to the changes in ecosystem service supply and demand and NESV/SESV in the BTH region, the ecological zones of the BTH region were divided, and differentiated land-use policies were put forward. The research can not only enrich ESV evaluation theories and methods, but also provide a scientific basis for the coordinated development of the BTH region and promote regional ecological civilization construction strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiumei Tang & Yu Liu & Yanmin Ren & Huiyi Feng, 2022. "A Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Services Value in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Based on Scarcity Modification of Spatiotemporal Supply–Demand Influence," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1545-:d:912918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1545/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1545/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhengxin Ji & Yueqing Xu & Hejie Wei, 2020. "Identifying Dynamic Changes in Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand for Urban Sustainability: Insights from a Rapidly Urbanizing City in Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Baumgartner, Stefan & Becker, Christian & Faber, Malte & Manstetten, Reiner, 2006. "Relative and absolute scarcity of nature. Assessing the roles of economics and ecology for biodiversity conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 487-498, October.
    3. Aibin Wu & Jianwen Zhang & Yanxia Zhao & Huitao Shen & Xiaoping Guo, 2022. "Simulation and Optimization of Supply and Demand Pattern of Multiobjective Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne & Weibel, Bettina, 2020. "Global assessment of mountain ecosystem services using earth observation data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    5. Bryan, Brett A. & Ye, Yanqiong & Zhang, Jia'en & Connor, Jeffery D., 2018. "Land-use change impacts on ecosystem services value: Incorporating the scarcity effects of supply and demand dynamics," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 144-157.
    6. Batabyal, Amitrajeet A. & Kahn, James R. & O'Neill, Robert V., 2003. "On the scarcity value of ecosystem services," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 334-352, September.
    7. Gundimeda, Haripriya & Sukhdev, Pavan & Sinha, Rajiv K. & Sanyal, Sanjeev, 2007. "Natural resource accounting for Indian states -- Illustrating the case of forest resources," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 635-649, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qianru Yu & Chen-Chieh Feng & NuanYin Xu & Luo Guo & Dan Wang, 2019. "Quantifying the Impact of Grain for Green Program on Ecosystem Service Management: A Case Study of Exibei Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Xiaoping Zhou & Lan Yang & Xiaokun Gu & Lufa Zhang & Li Li, 2022. "Scarcity Value Assessment of Ecosystem Services Based on Changes in Supply and Demand: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta City Cluster, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Campbell, Elliott T. & Tilley, David R., 2014. "Valuing ecosystem services from Maryland forests using environmental accounting," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 141-151.
    4. Omaid Najmuddin & Zhihui Li & Rabnawaz Khan & Weiqing Zhuang, 2022. "Valuation of Land-Use/Land-Cover-Based Ecosystem Services in Afghanistan—An Assessment of the Past and Future," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, October.
    5. Yajing Shao & Xuefeng Yuan & Chaoqun Ma & Ruifang Ma & Zhaoxia Ren, 2020. "Quantifying the Spatial Association between Land Use Change and Ecosystem Services Value: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Funk, Matt, 2008. "On the Problem of Sustainable Economic Development: A Theoretical Solution to this Prisoner's Dilemma," MPRA Paper 19025, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jun 2008.
    7. Mengzhu Liu & Leilei Min & Jingjing Zhao & Yanjun Shen & Hongwei Pei & Hongjuan Zhang & Yali Li, 2021. "The Impact of Land Use Change on Water-Related Ecosystem Services in the Bashang Area of Hebei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Berthold, Anne & Cologna, Viktoria & Siegrist, Michael, 2022. "The influence of scarcity perception on people's pro-environmental behavior and their readiness to accept new sustainable technologies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Baumgärtner, Stefan & Quaas, Martin F., 2009. "Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 2008-2020, May.
    10. Aevermann Tim & Schmude Jürgen, 2015. "Quantification and monetary valuation of urban ecosystem services in Munich, Germany," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 59(3), pages 188-200, December.
    11. Nicholas Z. Muller, 2014. "Toward the Measurement of Net Economic Welfare: Air Pollution Damage in the US National Accounts–2002, 2005, 2008," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring Economic Sustainability and Progress, pages 429-459, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Kari Hyytiäinen & Lassi Ahlvik & Heini Ahtiainen & Janne Artell & Anni Huhtala & Kim Dahlbo, 2015. "Policy Goals for Improved Water Quality in the Baltic Sea: When do the Benefits Outweigh the Costs?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 61(2), pages 217-241, June.
    13. Jendrzejewski, Błażej, 2020. "Bioeconomic modelling – An application of environmentally adjusted economic accounts and the computable general equilibrium model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Chucai Peng & Yang Xiang & Luxia Chen & Yangyang Zhang & Zhixiang Zhou, 2023. "The Impact of the Type and Abundance of Urban Blue Space on House Prices: A Case Study of Eight Megacities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-27, April.
    15. Egarter Vigl, Lukas & Marsoner, Thomas & Schirpke, Uta & Tscholl, Simon & Candiago, Sebastian & Depellegrin, Daniel, 2021. "A multi-pressure analysis of ecosystem services for conservation planning in the Alps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    16. Kisaka, Lily & Obi, Ajuruchukwu, 2015. "Farmers’ Preferences for Management Options as Payment for Environmental Services Scheme," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Pu-yan Nie & Peng Sun & Bill Z. Yang, 2014. "A Dynamic Study on Ecological Disaster, Government Regulation, and Renewable Resources," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 410-442, April.
    18. Stefano Duglio & Giulia Salotti & Giulia Mascadri, 2023. "Conditions for Operating in Marginal Mountain Areas: The Local Farmer’s Perspective," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, April.
    19. Padhan, Dasarathi & Das, Amarendra, 2022. "Physical and monetary asset accounting of mineral resources in India," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Rigala Na & Xinliang Xu & Shihao Wang, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Economic and Ecological Coupled Coordination: A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1545-:d:912918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.