IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1434-d902205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporal and Spatial Attractiveness Characteristics of Wuhan Urban Riverside from the Perspective of Traveling

Author

Listed:
  • Yuting Chen

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Bingyao Jia

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Jing Wu

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    Hubei Habitat Environment Research Center of Engineering and Technology, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Xuejun Liu

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    Hubei Habitat Environment Research Center of Engineering and Technology, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Tianyue Luo

    (Wuhan Transportation Development Strategy Institute, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Improving the attractiveness of urban waterfronts has become an important objective to promote economic development and improve the environmental quality. However, few studies have focused on the inherent characteristics of urban waterfront attractiveness. In this study, mobile phone signaling data and the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) were used to construct the attractiveness evaluation system of the riverside in Wuhan. The OLS (ordinary least squares) regression model was used to analyze the relationship between the POI (point of interest) and the attractiveness of river waterfronts. Furthermore, the high-or-low-value aggregation classification of research units was performed according to attractiveness and the POI indicators to reveal the influencing factors of the attractiveness of the Wuhan urban riverside. Results showed the following. (1) The high-value distribution of attractiveness of the river waterfronts in Wuhan presented regional aggregation characteristics, and the attractiveness of economically developed areas was high. (2) Consumer POIs (CPOIs) and outdoor recreation POIs (RPOIs) had a positive effect on the attractiveness of the riverside in Wuhan, while housing POIs (HPOIs), public service POIs (OPOIs), and the high degree of POI mixing had a negative impact on the attractiveness of the urban riverside. (3) The high–high agglomeration spaces were mainly concentrated in the economically developed areas of the city center, which are mainly open spaces where urban cultural activities are held, while the low–low agglomeration spaces were mostly gathered in the suburban areas. The spatial distribution of the high–low agglomeration spaces, which are mainly green open spaces, was relatively fragmented, while the low–high agglomeration spaces, which are mainly freight terminals, linear walks, and residential areas, were near the city center.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuting Chen & Bingyao Jia & Jing Wu & Xuejun Liu & Tianyue Luo, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Attractiveness Characteristics of Wuhan Urban Riverside from the Perspective of Traveling," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1434-:d:902205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1434/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1434/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angelo Mazza & Antonio Punzo, 2016. "Spatial attraction in migrants' settlement patterns in the city of Catania," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(5), pages 117-138.
    2. Olivier Crevoisier & Delphine Rime, 2021. "Anchoring Urban Development: Globalisation, Attractiveness and Complexity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(1), pages 36-52, January.
    3. Daniela A. Lessa & Carlos Lobo, 2021. "Mobility and Urban Centralities: An Analysis Based on the Motorized Flows Attraction in Belo Horizonte/State of Minas Gerais/Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Marichela Sepe, 2013. "Urban history and cultural resources in urban regeneration: a case of creative waterfront renewal," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 595-613, October.
    5. Mi Diao & Yi Zhu & Joseph Ferreira Jr & Carlo Ratti, 2016. "Inferring individual daily activities from mobile phone traces: A Boston example," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(5), pages 920-940, September.
    6. Merje Feldman, 2000. "Urban Waterfront Regeneration and Local Governance in Tallinn," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 829-850.
    7. Steenbruggen, John & Tranos, Emmanouil & Nijkamp, Peter, 2015. "Data from mobile phone operators: A tool for smarter cities?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 335-346.
    8. Tian Gao & Ling Zhu & Tian Zhang & Rui Song & Yuanqun Zhang & Ling Qiu, 2019. "Is an Environment with High Biodiversity the Most Attractive for Human Recreation? A Case Study in Baoji, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Alicja K. Zawadzka, 2021. "Architectural and Urban Attractiveness of Small Towns: A Case Study of Polish Coastal Cittaslow Towns on the Pomeranian Way of St. James," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, July.
    10. Żaneta Moskalonek & Marcin Połom & Krystian Puzdrakiewicz, 2020. "Changes in the Function of Allotment Gardens in an Attractive Location Based on the Example of Tri-City in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Lingjun Tang & Yu Lin & Sijia Li & Sheng Li & Jingyi Li & Fu Ren & Chao Wu, 2018. "Exploring the Influence of Urban Form on Urban Vibrancy in Shenzhen Based on Mobile Phone Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xueling Zhang & Ruoxuan Huang & Yixuan Yang, 2022. "On the Landscape Activity Measure Coupling Ecological Index and Public Vitality Index of UGI: The Case Study of Zhongshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, October.
    2. Li, Shaodong & Chen, Pengfei & Hui, Fengming & Gong, Mengjie, 2024. "Evaluating urban vitality and resilience under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic from a mobility perspective: A case study in Shenzhen, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Yan Long & Xi Liu & Shiqi Luo & Tianyue Luo & Siyu Hu & Yuqiao Zheng & Jingmei Shao & Xuejun Liu, 2023. "Evolution and Prediction of Urban Fringe Areas Based on Logistic–CA–Markov Models: The Case of Wuhan City," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-30, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yating Fan & Da Kuang & Wei Tu & Yu Ye, 2023. "Which Spatial Elements Influence Waterfront Space Vitality the Most?—A Comparative Tracking Study of the Maozhou River Renewal Project in Shenzhen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Yaxi Gong & Xiang Ji & Yuan Zhang & Shanshan Cheng, 2023. "Spatial Vitality Evaluation and Coupling Regulation Mechanism of a Complex Ecosystem in Lixiahe Plain Based on Multi-Source Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-32, January.
    3. Wang, Xiaoxi & Zhang, Yaojun & Yu, Danlin & Qi, Jinghan & Li, Shujing, 2022. "Investigating the spatiotemporal pattern of urban vibrancy and its determinants: Spatial big data analyses in Beijing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Hao Lei & Youmei Zhou, 2022. "Conducting Heritage Tourism-Led Urban Renewal in Chinese Historical and Cultural Urban Spaces: A Case Study of Datong," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Ling Qiu & Qujing Chen & Tian Gao, 2021. "The Effects of Urban Natural Environments on Preference and Self-Reported Psychological Restoration of the Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Aleksandra Djukić & Jelena Marić & Branislav Antonić & Vladimir Kovač & Jugoslav Joković & Nikola Dinkić, 2020. "The Evaluation of Urban Renewal Waterfront Development: The Case of the Sava Riverfront in Belgrade, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Claudio Gariazzo & Armando Pelliccioni & Maria Paola Bogliolo, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Urban Mobility Using Aggregate Mobile Phone Derived Presence and Demographic Data: A Case Study in the City of Rome, Italy," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Sebastian Bernat & Małgorzata Flaga, 2022. "Cittàslow as An Alternative Path of Town Development and Revitalisation in Peripheral Areas: The Example of The Lublin Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Longlong Zhang & Jingwen Yuan & Chulsoo Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Planning and Design of Ocean City Spatial Forms Based on Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Fangye Du & Jiaoe Wang & Liang Mao & Jian Kang, 2024. "Daily rhythm of urban space usage: insights from the nexus of urban functions and human mobility," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Jinyao Lin & Yaye Zhuang & Yang Zhao & Hua Li & Xiaoyu He & Siyan Lu, 2022. "Measuring the Non-Linear Relationship between Three-Dimensional Built Environment and Urban Vitality Based on a Random Forest Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. D. Woods & A. Cunningham & C. E. Utazi & M. Bondarenko & L. Shengjie & G. E. Rogers & P. Koper & C. W. Ruktanonchai & E. zu Erbach-Schoenberg & A. J. Tatem & J. Steele & A. Sorichetta, 2022. "Exploring methods for mapping seasonal population changes using mobile phone data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Xin Li & Bingruo Duan, 2018. "Organizational microblogging for event marketing: a new approach to creative placemaking," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 59-79, January.
    14. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    15. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2020. "Measuring the urban sustainable development in cities through a Composite Index: The case of Portugal," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 507-520, July.
    16. Federico Benassi & Francesca Bitonti & Angelo Mazza & Salvatore Strozza, 2023. "Sri Lankans’ residential segregation and spatial inequalities in Southern Italy: an empirical analysis using fine-scale data on regular lattice geographies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1629-1648, April.
    17. Anita Kwartnik-Pruc & Gabriela Droj, 2023. "The Role of Allotments and Community Gardens and the Challenges Facing Their Development in Urban Environments—A Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-26, January.
    18. Li, Shaoying & Zhuang, Caigang & Tan, Zhangzhi & Gao, Feng & Lai, Zhipeng & Wu, Zhifeng, 2021. "Inferring the trip purposes and uncovering spatio-temporal activity patterns from dockless shared bike dataset in Shenzhen, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Ewelina Pochodyła-Ducka & Rasa Pranskuniene, 2024. "Assessing the Success of the Development Strategy of the Cittaslow Movement: An Analysis of Revitalisation Programs and Experts Insights on the Model for Small Towns’ Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Sijia Li & Chao Wu & Yu Lin & Zhengyang Li & Qingyun Du, 2020. "Urban Morphology Promotes Urban Vibrancy from the Spatiotemporal and Synergetic Perspectives: A Case Study Using Multisource Data in Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1434-:d:902205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.