IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1251-d881525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Heritage Conservation and Modern Urban Development from the Perspective of the Historic Urban Landscape Approach: A Case Study of Suzhou

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Jiang

    (Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Chiba 271-8510, Japan)

  • Tiancheng Zhou

    (Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Chiba 271-8510, Japan)

  • Yirui Han

    (Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Chiba 271-8510, Japan)

  • Konomi Ikebe

    (Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Chiba 271-8510, Japan)

Abstract

Suzhou is one of China’s model cities due to its economic development in recent decades. Although the city deserves recognition for its efforts in urban heritage conservation, the current preservation strategy only targets the ancient city and neglects the separation of the entire urban landscape. This has become a huge hidden problem in the process of Suzhou’s sustainable development. This study, based on this background, explores the development process of Suzhou and the problems in the current urban planning, and then proposes suggestions for optimization. The historic urban landscape approach provides a solution to this problem by analyzing the urban form and urban landscape features of Suzhou in three important historical periods: pre-1949, 1949–1978, and post-1978. This study discusses the development process of Suzhou and the problems in the current urban planning, and makes the following contributions: (1) the dichotomy between modernity and tradition in the urban landscape of Suzhou is shown from a morphological perspective, revealing that this dichotomy is based on rapid urbanization and the one-sided pursuit of economic development, (2) revisits the role of Suzhou traditional gardens in order to better integrate them as structural elements in urban planning, (3) proposes the intangible value of urban heritage and combined with the historic urban landscape of looking beyond the notion of the “historic center” or “ensemble” to help all Suzhou residents form a more coherent place attachment and local identity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Jiang & Tiancheng Zhou & Yirui Han & Konomi Ikebe, 2022. "Urban Heritage Conservation and Modern Urban Development from the Perspective of the Historic Urban Landscape Approach: A Case Study of Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1251-:d:881525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1251/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1251/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fortuna De Rosa & Maria Di Palma, 2013. "Historic Urban Landscape Approach and Port Cities Regeneration: Naples between Identity and Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Tiantian Zhang & Zefeng Lian, 2021. "Research on the Distribution and Scale Evolution of Suzhou Gardens under the Urbanization Process from the Tang to the Qing Dynasty," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Stephen Rippon, 2013. "Historic Landscape Character and Sense of Place," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 179-202, April.
    4. Kırmızı, Özge & Karaman, Aykut, 2021. "A participatory planning model in the context of Historic Urban Landscape: The case of Kyrenia’s Historic Port Area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Jiang & Tongguang Zang & Jianglong Xing & Konomi Ikebe, 2023. "Spatial Distribution of Urban Heritage and Landscape Approach to Urban Contextual Continuity: The Case of Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Tiancheng Zhou & Tongguang Zang & Jun Jiang & Xiaoqi Yang & Konomi Ikebe, 2023. "Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Social Participation Awareness on Urban Heritage Conservation: The Example of Suzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danjie Shen & Shujing Dong, 2022. "Transition of Urban Morphology in the Mountainous Areas Since Early-Modern Times from the Perspective of Urban Historic Landscape—A GIS Tools and Historical Map Translation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Min Yin & Jiangang Xu & Zhongyuan Yang, 2019. "Preliminary Research on Planning of Decentralizing Ancient Towns in Small-Scale Famous Historic and Cultural Cities with a Case Study of Tingchow County, Fujian Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Nir Mualam & Nir Barak, 2019. "Evaluating Comparative Research: Mapping and Assessing Current Trends in Built Heritage Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Xiaohua Zhong & Ho Hon Leung, 2019. "Exploring Participatory Microregeneration as Sustainable Renewal of Built Heritage Community: Two Case Studies in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Jiayan Yun & Wenbo Yu & Hao Wang, 2021. "Exploring the Distribution of Gardens in Suzhou City in the Qianlong Period through a Space Syntax Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Yang Zhao & Junhan Liu & Yali Zheng, 2022. "Preservation and Renewal: A Study on Visual Evaluation of Urban Historical and Cultural Street Landscape in Quanzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.
    7. Anna Bocheńska-Skałecka & Maria Ostrowska-Dudys & Edward Hutnik & Wojciech Jakubowski, 2022. "Parameterization in the Analysis of Changes in the Rural Landscape on the Example of Agritourism Farms in Kłodzko District (Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Figlus Tomasz, 2020. "Process of Incorporation and Morphological Transformations of Rural Settlement Patterns in the Context of Urban Development. The Case Study of Łódź," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(2), pages 75-95, June.
    9. Jun Jiang & Tongguang Zang & Jianglong Xing & Konomi Ikebe, 2023. "Spatial Distribution of Urban Heritage and Landscape Approach to Urban Contextual Continuity: The Case of Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Hanzheng Lin & Jia-Bing Wang & Xuewei Zhang & Fangbing Hu & Jiang Liu & Xin-Chen Hong, 2024. "Historical sensing: the spatial pattern of soundscape occurrences recorded in poems between the Tang and the Qing Dynasties amid urbanization," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, December.
    11. Ying Zheng & Jingzhu Zhao & Guofan Shao, 2020. "Port City Sustainability: A Review of Its Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Paddington Hodza & Kurtis A. Butler, 2022. "Juxtaposing GIS and Archaeologically Mapped Ancient Road Routes," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Aftabi, Pegah & Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad, 2023. "Developing a decision-making framework within the management of historical cities: Towards integrated conservation and development of the Roudaki neighbourhood," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    14. Weiwen Li & Chi Gao, 2023. "Research on Changsha Gardens in Ming Dynasty, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Jing Zhang & Yuchen Shang & Qiang Li & Shiwen Zhang & Jinsong Xiao & Min Li, 2021. "Inheritance and Development: Study on the Overall Management and Control Strategies of the North–South Extension of Central Axis of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Ali Keyvanfar & Arezou Shafaghat & Sapura Mohamad & Mu’azu Mohammed Abdullahi & Hamidah Ahmad & Nurul Hidayah Mohd Derus & Majid Khorami, 2018. "A Sustainable Historic Waterfront Revitalization Decision Support Tool for Attracting Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1251-:d:881525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.