IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v129y2023ics0264837723001199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a decision-making framework within the management of historical cities: Towards integrated conservation and development of the Roudaki neighbourhood

Author

Listed:
  • Aftabi, Pegah
  • Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad

Abstract

Urban management is fraught with challenges, particularly when it comes to devising a decision-making system that is efficient and broadly supported by all stakeholders. This procedure is considerably more demanding in urban heritage administration, involving a diverse range of conservation and development actors. In addition, with cities and urban regions becoming more complex in recent decades, governments are increasingly seeking to understand the significance of cultural heritage in encouraging long-term sustainable development initiatives. Following these concerns, this paper extensively analyses the relevant literature to create a theoretical decision-making framework for the integrated conservation and development of heritage cities. Through both quantitative and qualitative methods, this research investigates decision-making strategies by analysing the tactics, actions, and impacts of conservation and development initiatives in the Roudaki neighbourhood, with a particular emphasis on the perspectives of key participants in the process. Upon identifying research indicators using the theoretical framework, this study adopts a quantitative methodology to collect questionnaires from three influential groups of actors. This phase is carried out by calculating correlations between variables in SPSS in order to delve into the connections between the research's criteria in a specific case study, resulting in a detailed analytical framework for the classification of decision-making priorities in district administration. To proceed to the qualitative stage, semi-structured interviews were arranged with urban officials to get a sense of the district's current state and to conduct a comparative analysis of the collected data from both phases of the research. The results suggest that while participatory decision-making approaches and integrated management techniques can be beneficial for urban heritage administration, it is essential to identify the decision-making priorities and resolve inconsistencies between implemented policies and actors' demands and perceptions. Accordingly, this procedure unifies conflicting interests, facilitates the proper execution of integrated management strategies, and ensures the long-term preservation of historical cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Aftabi, Pegah & Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad, 2023. "Developing a decision-making framework within the management of historical cities: Towards integrated conservation and development of the Roudaki neighbourhood," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:129:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723001199
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723001199
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:lib:000cis:v:5:y:2017:i:2:p:11-22 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Pourzakarya, Maryam & Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad, 2021. "Community-led regeneration practice in Ghalam Gudeh District, Bandar Anzali, Iran: A participatory action research (PAR) Project," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Maksić, Milica & Dobričić, Milica & Trkulja, Siniša, 2018. "Institutional limitations in the management of UNESCO cultural heritage in Serbia: The case of Gamzigrad-Romuliana archaeological site," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 195-206.
    4. Chahardowli, Mehrdad & Sajadzadeh, Hassan, 2022. "A strategic development model for regeneration of urban historical cores: A case study of the historical fabric of Hamedan City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Stacchini, Annalisa & Guizzardi, Andrea & Mariotti, Alessia, 2022. "Smoothing down arbitrariness in planning: From SWOT to participatory decision making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Wang, Hao & Zhao, Yizhu & Gao, Xichen & Gao, Boyang, 2021. "Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Throsby,David, 2000. "Economics and Culture," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521584067, October.
    8. Kırmızı, Özge & Karaman, Aykut, 2021. "A participatory planning model in the context of Historic Urban Landscape: The case of Kyrenia’s Historic Port Area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Allen J Scott & Mark Ellis, 2000. "The Culture Economy of Paris∗," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 567-582, September.
    10. Erfani, Goran & Roe, Maggie, 2020. "Institutional stakeholder participation in urban redevelopment in Tehran: An evaluation of decisions and actions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reena Tiwari & Courtney Babb & Marian Tye & Fatmaelzahraa Hussein, 2024. "The Wharf Street Smart Park Story: A Guide to Navigating Multi-Stakeholder Innovation in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Yabing Xu & John Rollo & Yolanda Esteban & Hui Tong & Xin Yin, 2021. "Developing a Comprehensive Assessment Model of Social Value with Respect to Heritage Value for Sustainable Heritage Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Margherita Pazzini & Rachele Corticelli & Claudio Lantieri & Cecilia Mazzoli, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Analysis and Decision-Making Approach for the Urban Regeneration: The Application to the Rimini Canal Port (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Kaijian Li & Ruopeng Huang & Guiwen Liu & Asheem Shrestha & Xinyue Fu, 2022. "Social Capital in Neighbourhood Renewal: A Holistic and State of the Art Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Christian Barrère, 2007. "Luxury Industries: Heritage Industries? [Les industries du luxe : des industries de patrimoines ?]," Post-Print hal-02615418, HAL.
    6. Marco Acri & Saša Dobričić & Maja Debevec, 2021. "Regenerating the Historic Urban Landscape through Circular Bottom-Up Actions: The Urban Seeding Process in Rijeka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, April.
    7. repec:ipg:wpaper:13 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Mikolaj Stanek & Alberto Veira, 2012. "Ethnic niching in a segmented labour market: Evidence from Spain," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 9(3), pages 249-262, September.
    9. Bruno S. Frey & Paolo Pamini & Lasse Steiner, 2011. "What Determines The World Heritage List? An Econometric Analysis," CREMA Working Paper Series 2011-01, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    10. Bruno Frey, 2005. "Problems with Publishing: Existing State and Solutions," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 173-190, April.
    11. Korpi, Martin & Hedberg, Charlotta & Pettersson, Katarina, 2013. "Immigrant Women and Entrepreneurship: A Study of the Health Care Sector in Sweden, 2002-2006," SULCIS Working Papers 2013:3, Stockholm University, Linnaeus Center for Integration Studies - SULCIS.
    12. Rachid Belaroussi & Margherita Pazzini & Israa Issa & Corinne Dionisio & Claudio Lantieri & Elena Díaz González & Valeria Vignali & Sonia Adelé, 2023. "Assessing the Future Streetscape of Rimini Harbor Docks with Virtual Reality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    13. Yifei Hu & Liu Wu & Ni Li & Tianwei Zhao, 2024. "Multi-Agent Decision-Making in Construction Engineering and Management: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Arjo Klamer, 2001. "A pragmatic view on values in economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 191-212.
    15. Bruno S. Frey & Paolo Pamini, 2009. "World Heritage: Where Are We? An Empirical Analysis," CREMA Working Paper Series 2009-31, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    16. Luc Renneboog & Christophe Spaenjers, 2013. "Buying Beauty: On Prices and Returns in the Art Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 36-53, February.
    17. Bruno S. Frey, "undated". "Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing Between One�s Own Ideas and Academic Failure," IEW - Working Papers 117, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    18. Gregory James J. & Rogerson Christian M., 2018. "Suburban creativity: The geography of creative industriesin Johannesburg," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 39(39), pages 31-52, March.
    19. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-013 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Hedberg, Charlotta, 2009. "Intersections of Immigrant status and Gender in the Swedish Entrepreneurial Landscape," SULCIS Working Papers 2009:8, Stockholm University, Linnaeus Center for Integration Studies - SULCIS.
    21. Bruno S. Frey & Paolo Pamini, 2009. "Making World Heritage Truly Global: The Culture Certificate Scheme," CREMA Working Paper Series 2009-13, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    22. Schumacher, Ingmar, 2015. "The endogenous formation of an environmental culture," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 200-221.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:129:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723001199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.