IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i6p1617-d214730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Participatory Microregeneration as Sustainable Renewal of Built Heritage Community: Two Case Studies in Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohua Zhong

    (Department of Sociology, School of Political Science and International Relations, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Ho Hon Leung

    (Sociology Department, State University of New York College at Oneonta, Oneonta, NY 13820, USA)

Abstract

Since the 1990s, Shanghai has experienced massive urban development and renewal as ways to respond to its demographic, economic, and living space needs. Previous policies have led to the demolishment of many historical communities and valuable heritage housing. The existing ones continue to face extreme threats, such as bad physical conditions and the marginalization of communities. Yet there is a recent trend that emphasizes sustainable urban renewal named microregeneration (微更新), launched by municipal and local states since 2016. One of the main approaches of the initiative was to form new urban coalitions to focus on collaborative governance that helps integrate different agents’ expertise and values for more sustainable urban developments and renewals. This paper explores two cases on how this concept has emerged. The first case is An Shan Si Cun (鞍山四村). This housing block was built in the 1950s for employees of some state-owned enterprises. The second case is Jing Lao Cun (敬老邨). This alley house neighborhood was built in 1930s for migrants who came to Shanghai. Furthermore, this paper is to explore and compare their approaches to sustainable urban renewal, which attempts to preserve these communities that represent cultural and built heritage in Shanghai. Specifically, this paper examines the challenges and accomplishments of these experiments, and discusses policy implications for future tactics of sustainable urban renewal.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohua Zhong & Ho Hon Leung, 2019. "Exploring Participatory Microregeneration as Sustainable Renewal of Built Heritage Community: Two Case Studies in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1617-:d:214730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1617/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1617/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jimura, Takamitsu, 2011. "The impact of world heritage site designation on local communities – A case study of Ogimachi, Shirakawa-mura, Japan," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 288-296.
    2. Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa & Jaafar, Mastura & Ahmad, A. Ghafar & Barghi, Rabeeh, 2017. "Community participation in World Heritage Site conservation and tourism development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 142-153.
    3. Fortuna De Rosa & Maria Di Palma, 2013. "Historic Urban Landscape Approach and Port Cities Regeneration: Naples between Identity and Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Stephanie Ryberg-Webster, 2019. "One step ahead of the bulldozer: historic preservation in Houston, Texas," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 15-33, January.
    5. Susan O. Keitumetse, 2011. "Sustainable development and cultural heritage management in Botswana: towards sustainable communities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(1), pages 49-59, January/F.
    6. Esther Hiu Kwan Yung & Edwin Hon Wan Chan & Ying Xu, 2014. "Sustainable Development and the Rehabilitation of a Historic Urban District – Social Sustainability in the Case of Tianzifang in Shanghai," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 95-112, March.
    7. Julia Gerometta & Hartmut Haussermann & Giulia Longo, 2005. "Social Innovation and Civil Society in Urban Governance: Strategies for an Inclusive City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 2007-2021, October.
    8. Xuefei Ren, 2014. "The Political Economy of Urban Ruins: Redeveloping Shanghai," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1081-1091, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreea-Oana Enache, 2020. "Contemporary Influence on the Built Cultural Heritage. Case Study Applied in the Villages of MureÈ™ County," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Carmen NÄ‚STASE (ed.), 16th Economic International Conference NCOE 4.0 2020, edition 1, volume 13, chapter 39, pages 430-437, Editura Lumen.
    2. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    3. Eduardo Natividade-Jesus & Arminda Almeida & Nuno Sousa & João Coutinho-Rodrigues, 2019. "A Case Study Driven Integrated Methodology to Support Sustainable Urban Regeneration Planning and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Enache Oana Andreea, 2019. "The Role Of The Diaspora In Promoting Tourism For The Valorisation Of Cultural Heritage. Case Study Romania," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 7(1), pages 037-040, June.
    5. Simeng Li & Zhimin Liu & Chao Ye, 2022. "Community Renewal under Multi-Stakeholder Co-Governance: A Case Study of Shanghai’s Inner City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sunday Oladipo Oladeji & Oyeniran Grace & Akeju Ayobami Ayodeji, 2022. "Community Participation in Conservation and Management of Cultural Heritage Resources in Yoruba Ethnic Group of South Western Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    2. Qun Liu & Zhaoping Yang & Fang Wang, 2017. "Conservation Policy-Community Conflicts: A Case Study from Bogda Nature Reserve, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Kinga Kimic & Carlos Smaniotto Costa & Mihaela Negulescu, 2021. "Creating Tourism Destinations of Underground Built Heritage—The Cases of Salt Mines in Poland, Portugal, and Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Cheng Zhang & Wei Cheng & Wanli Zhang, 2023. "Does World Heritage inscription promote regional tourism? Evidence from China," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(4), pages 929-951, June.
    5. Juan E. Núñez-Ríos & Jacqueline Y. Sánchez-García & Omar G. Rojas & Elias Olivares-Benitez, 2020. "Factors to Foster Organizational Sustainability in Tourism SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Milena Nedeljković Knežević & Marko D. Petrović & Slađana Nedeljković & Maja Mijatov & Milan M. Radovanović & Mirjana Gajić & Miroslav Škoda, 2019. "Changes in Traditional Activities of Industrial Area toward Sustainable Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Marioara Pascu & Ileana Pătru-Stupariu, 2021. "The Assessment of the Authenticity and Conservation Status of Cultural Landscapes in Southern Transylvania (Romania)," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Carlos Barros, 2012. "Sustainable Tourism in Inhambane-Mozambique," CEsA Working Papers 105, CEsA - Centre for African and Development Studies.
    9. Nan Guo & Edwin Hon Wan Chan & Esther Hiu Kwan Yung, 2020. "Alternative Governance Model for Historical Building Conservation in China: From Property Rights Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Guillermo Bermúdez-González & Eva María Sánchez-Teba & María-Dolores Benítez-Márquez & José Jesús Vegas-Melero, 2023. "Generation Z members‘ intentions to work in tourism in their World Heritage Site hometowns," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Mohamed Abdalla Elsayed Hassan & Konstantina Zerva & Silvia Aulet, 2021. "Brand Personality Traits of World Heritage Sites: Text Mining Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Fang Wang & Zhao Liu & Shanshan Shang & Yuelei Qin & Bihu Wu, 2019. "Vitality continuation or over-commercialization? Spatial structure characteristics of commercial services and population agglomeration in historic and cultural areas," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(8), pages 1302-1326, December.
    14. Kumar Bhatta & Yasuo Ohe & Adriano Ciani, 2020. "Which Human Resources Are Important for Turning Agritourism Potential into Reality? SWOT Analysis in Rural Nepal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa & Ringle, Christian M. & Jaafar, Mastura & Ramayah, T., 2017. "Urban vs. rural destinations: Residents’ perceptions, community participation and support for tourism development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 147-158.
    16. Qi Zhang & Esther Hiu-Kwan Yung & Edwin Hon-Wan Chan, 2021. "Meshing Sustainability with Satisfaction: An Investigation of Residents’ Perceptions in Three Different Neighbourhoods in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-32, November.
    17. Min Yin & Jiangang Xu & Zhongyuan Yang, 2019. "Preliminary Research on Planning of Decentralizing Ancient Towns in Small-Scale Famous Historic and Cultural Cities with a Case Study of Tingchow County, Fujian Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Nir Mualam & Nir Barak, 2019. "Evaluating Comparative Research: Mapping and Assessing Current Trends in Built Heritage Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, January.
    19. Min Wang & Shuqi Yang & Huajie Gao & Kahaer Abudu, 2021. "The Characteristics, Influencing Factors, and Push-Pull Mechanism of Shrinking Counties: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    20. Timo Kaphengst & Eike Karola Velten, 2014. "Energy Transition and Behavioural Change in Rural Areas – The Role of Energy Cooperatives. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 60," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47214, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1617-:d:214730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.