IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i4p495-d782364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Perception of the Historical and Cultural Blocks of Beijing Based on Weibo Photos

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Chen

    (College of Applied Arts and Science, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China
    Laboratory of Urban Cultural Sensing & Computing, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Bin Meng

    (College of Applied Arts and Science, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China
    Laboratory of Urban Cultural Sensing & Computing, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Na Liu

    (College of Applied Arts and Science, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China
    Laboratory of Urban Cultural Sensing & Computing, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China
    Office of Party History Data Collection Committee of Yumen Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China, Yumen 735200, China)

  • Zhenyu Qi

    (College of Applied Arts and Science, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China
    Laboratory of Urban Cultural Sensing & Computing, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China
    Beijing Momenta Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jian Liu

    (Laboratory of Urban Cultural Sensing & Computing, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China
    College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Juan Wang

    (College of Applied Arts and Science, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China
    Laboratory of Urban Cultural Sensing & Computing, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China)

Abstract

Historic blocks are steeped in the history and culture of a city, reflecting the characteristics of the landscape during historical periods; they are of great significance to the preservation of the historical memory of the city. However, existing research generally lacks integration with big data, and research perspectives are mostly from the conservation planning of historic blocks, the evaluation mechanisms of blocks, and the development of block tourism resources; thus, the public perception is lacking. This study involved 28 historical and cultural blocks in Beijing, the capital of China, and constructed a system of cultural perception symbols based on the cultural connotations of the capital. On this basis, photo recognition was conducted on Weibo photo data collected by relying on the photo segmentation method, and the intrinsic factors affecting the cultural perception of the historical and cultural blocks were explored from the perspective of public perception (local residents and tourists). The results show that: (1) the capital culture of Beijing can be roughly divided into five categories: ancient capital culture, red culture, Beijing-style culture, innovation culture, and other types of culture, based on the photo recognition method; (2) from the perspective of public perception, the degree of perception of Beijing culture and innovation culture is generally higher, while the degree of perception of red culture and ancient capital culture is lower; (3) the 28 historic and cultural blocks of Beijing’s old city are mainly dominated by one or more cultures, and there are no historic and cultural blocks with a balance of five cultures, reflecting the relative lack of cultural diversity within the blocks; (4) the local cultural identity of Beijing is prominent and dominant in the public mind. However, local residents have a relatively high perception of innovative culture, whereas tourists have a higher perception of ancient capital culture and red culture. In this study, photo recognition technology was introduced to study the cultural perception of historical and cultural blocks to provide new ideas and methods for the study of historical and cultural blocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Chen & Bin Meng & Na Liu & Zhenyu Qi & Jian Liu & Juan Wang, 2022. "Cultural Perception of the Historical and Cultural Blocks of Beijing Based on Weibo Photos," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:495-:d:782364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/495/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/495/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haifeng Luo & Bor-Shuenn Chiou, 2021. "Framing the Hierarchy of Cultural Tourism Attractiveness of Chinese Historic Districts under the Premise of Landscape Conservation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Mehmet Cetin & Hakan Sevik, 2016. "Assessing Potential Areas of Ecotourism through a Case Study in Ilgaz Mountain National Park," Chapters, in: Leszek Butowski (ed.), Tourism - From Empirical Research Towards Practical Application, IntechOpen.
    3. Tina Davoodi & Uğur Ulaş Dağlı, 2019. "Exploring the Determinants of Residential Satisfaction in Historic Urban Quarters: Towards Sustainability of the Walled City Famagusta, North Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Juan Carlos Duque & Raúl Ramos & Jordi Suriñach, 2007. "Supervised Regionalization Methods: A Survey," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 195-220, July.
    5. Hao Zhang & Taeyoung Cho & Huanjiong Wang & Quansheng Ge, 2018. "The Influence of Cross-Cultural Awareness and Tourist Experience on Authenticity, Tourist Satisfaction and Acculturation in World Cultural Heritage Sites of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Huaiyun Kou & Jian Zhou & Jie Chen & Sichu Zhang, 2018. "Conservation for Sustainable Development: The Sustainability Evaluation of the Xijie Historic District, Dujiangyan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Federico Camerin & Nicola Camatti & Francesco Gastaldi, 2021. "Military Barracks as Cultural Heritage in Italy: A Comparison between before-1900- and 1900-to-1950-Built Barracks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoxu Liang & Naisi Hua & John Martin & Elena Dellapiana & Cristina Coscia & Yu Zhang, 2022. "Social Media as a Medium to Promote Local Perception Expression in China’s World Heritage Sites," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Lo Presti & Maria Rosaria Carli, 2021. "Italian Catacombs and Their Digital Presence for Underground Heritage Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Alexandre Xavier Ywata Carvalho & Pedro Henrique Melo Albuquerque & Gilberto Rezende de Almeida Junior & Rafael Dantas Guimarães & Camilo Rey Laureto, 2009. "Clusterização Hierárquica Espacial com Atributos Binários," Discussion Papers 1428, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    3. Marioara Pascu & Ileana Pătru-Stupariu, 2021. "The Assessment of the Authenticity and Conservation Status of Cultural Landscapes in Southern Transylvania (Romania)," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Verónica Arredondo & Miguel Martínez-Panero & Teresa Peña & Federica Ricca, 2021. "Mathematical political districting taking care of minority groups," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 375-402, October.
    5. Juan Jiménez & Jordi Perdiguero, 2012. "Does Rigidity of Prices Hide Collusion?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 41(3), pages 223-248, November.
    6. Lingxia Wang & Zhongwu Li & Danyang Wang & Xiaoqian Hu & Ke Ning, 2020. "Self-Organizing Map Network-Based Soil and Water Conservation Partitioning for Small Watersheds: Case Study Conducted in Xiaoyang Watershed, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Manuela Alcañiz & Montserrat Guillén & Daniel Sánchez-Moscona & Miguel Santolino & Oscar Llatje & Lluís Ramon, 2013. "Prevalence of alcohol-impaired drivers based on random breath tests in a roadside survey," Working Papers XREAP2013-05, Xarxa de Referència en Economia Aplicada (XREAP), revised Jul 2013.
    8. Sebastiano Carbonara & Marco Faustoferri & Davide Stefano, 2021. "Real Estate Values and Urban Quality: A Multiple Linear Regression Model for Defining an Urban Quality Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Calzada, Joan & Martínez-Santos, Fernando, 2014. "Broadband prices in the European Union: Competition and commercial strategies," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 24-38.
    10. Taylor M. Oshan & Levi J. Wolf & Mehak Sachdeva & Sarah Bardin & A. Stewart Fotheringham, 2022. "A scoping review on the multiplicity of scale in spatial analysis," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 293-324, July.
    11. Shivangi S. Somvanshi & Oshin Bhalla & Phool Kunwar & Madhulika Singh & Prafull Singh, 2020. "Monitoring spatial LULC changes and its growth prediction based on statistical models and earth observation datasets of Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1073-1091, February.
    12. Esther Goya & Esther Vayá & Jordi Suriñach, 2012. "“Do intra- and inter-industry spillovers matter? CDM model estimates for Spain”," IREA Working Papers 201214, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Sep 2012.
    13. Hao Zhang & Taeyoung Cho & Huanjiong Wang, 2019. "The Impact of a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense Incident on Tourism Risk Perception and Attitude Change of Chinese Tourists Traveling to South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Jordi Perdiguero & Juan Luis Jiménez, 2012. "“Policy options for the promotion of electric vehicles: a review”," IREA Working Papers 201208, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Mar 2012.
    15. Artis, Michael & Moreno, Rosina & Miguelez, Ernest, 2009. "Assessing agglomeration economies in a spatial framework with endogenous regressors," CEPR Discussion Papers 7267, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Ernest Miguélez & Rorina Moreno, 2012. "“What attracts knowledge workers? The role of space, social connections, institutions, jobs and amenities”," AQR Working Papers 201203, University of Barcelona, Regional Quantitative Analysis Group, revised Feb 2012.
    17. Theano S. Terkenli, 2021. "Research Advances in Tourism-Landscape Interrelations: An Editorial," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-8, September.
    18. repec:asg:wpaper:1008 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Mohsen Kalantari & Alireza Rahmaty Ghavagh & Ara Toomanian & Qiumars Yazdanpanah Dero, 2016. "A New Methodological Framework for Crime Spatial Analysis Using Local Entropy Map," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 179-179, September.
    20. Ginevra Balletto & Mara Ladu & Federico Camerin & Emilio Ghiani & Jacopo Torriti, 2022. "More Circular City in the Energy and Ecological Transition: A Methodological Approach to Sustainable Urban Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    21. Pantas H. Silaban & Andri D.K. Silalahi & Edgar Octoyuda & Donita Panjaitan, 2020. "The Role of Authenticity and Satisfaction on Tourists' Revisit Intention at Air Soda Destination," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 365-376.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:495-:d:782364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.