IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12010-d668661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Italian Catacombs and Their Digital Presence for Underground Heritage Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Lo Presti

    (National Research Council—Institute for Studies on the Mediterranean (ISMed), 80134 Naples, Italy)

  • Maria Rosaria Carli

    (National Research Council—Institute for Studies on the Mediterranean (ISMed), 80134 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

The Italian catacombs represent one of the most interesting examples of the country’s underground built heritage. A strategic use of digital technologies can foster their sustainability by providing virtual access to local communities and tourists, as well as by transferring their value to future generations. Referring to a classification of the catacombs of Italy carried out by the Pontifical Commission for Sacred Archaeology of Vatican City, this paper analyzes the digital presence of this heritage within the contexts of social media, video sharing and navigation platforms in institutional and touristic areas. The emerging results show a good digital presence of this cultural heritage on these platforms. At the same time, they reflect an almost total absence of 3D technologies, virtual reconstructions or augmented reality. Only 2 out of 63 catacombs analyzed offer a photographic overview of the sites through the online Google Art and Culture platform, but this is only a small example of what a virtual visit would offer. The following work is based on this notion, as it aims to demonstrate that this type of underground built heritage still has great potential for the valorization and sustainability of these sites through the use of digital technologies. The use of virtual and augmented reality, enhanced by immersive storytelling, would limit the physical wear and tear on the site, making its conservation sustainable in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Lo Presti & Maria Rosaria Carli, 2021. "Italian Catacombs and Their Digital Presence for Underground Heritage Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-10, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12010-:d:668661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12010/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12010/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huaiyun Kou & Jian Zhou & Jie Chen & Sichu Zhang, 2018. "Conservation for Sustainable Development: The Sustainability Evaluation of the Xijie Historic District, Dujiangyan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hossein Mousazadeh & Amir Ghorbani & Hossein Azadi & Farahnaz Akbarzadeh Almani & Ali Zangiabadi & Kai Zhu & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Developing Sustainable Behaviors for Underground Heritage Tourism Management: The Case of Persian Qanats, a UNESCO World Heritage Property," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Francesco Di Stefano & Alessandro Torresani & Elisa M. Farella & Roberto Pierdicca & Fabio Menna & Fabio Remondino, 2021. "3D Surveying of Underground Built Heritage: Opportunities and Challenges of Mobile Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Sanja Kovačić & Tatjana Pivac & Müge Akkar Ercan & Kinga Kimic & Petja Ivanova-Radovanova & Klodiana Gorica & Ermelinda Kordha Tolica, 2023. "Exploring the Image, Perceived Authenticity, and Perceived Value of Underground Built Heritage (UBH) and Its Role in Motivation to Visit: A Case Study of Five Different Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Olga Lo Presti & Maria Rosaria Carli, 2023. "Promoting Underground Cultural Heritage through Sustainable Practices: A Design Thinking and Audience Development Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-9, June.
    5. María Antonia Diaz Mendoza & Emiro De La Hoz Franco & Jorge Eliecer Gómez Gómez, 2023. "Technologies for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage—A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-28, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marzieh Fallah & Lanndon Ocampo, 2021. "The use of the Delphi method with non-parametric analysis for identifying sustainability criteria and indicators in evaluating ecotourism management: the case of Penang National Park (Malaysia)," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 45-62, March.
    2. Shuyi Xie, 2019. "Learning from Italian Typology- and Morphology-Led Planning Techniques: A Planning Framework for Yingping, Xiamen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Siyu Chen & Bin Meng & Na Liu & Zhenyu Qi & Jian Liu & Juan Wang, 2022. "Cultural Perception of the Historical and Cultural Blocks of Beijing Based on Weibo Photos," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Haifeng Luo & Bor-Shuenn Chiou, 2021. "Framing the Hierarchy of Cultural Tourism Attractiveness of Chinese Historic Districts under the Premise of Landscape Conservation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Mohammed Abdulfattah Bay & Mohammed Mashary Alnaim & Ghazy Abdullah Albaqawy & Emad Noaime, 2022. "The Heritage Jewel of Saudi Arabia: A Descriptive Analysis of the Heritage Management and Development Activities in the At-Turaif District in Ad-Dir’iyah, a World Heritage Site (WHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12010-:d:668661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.