IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i4p455-d777050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Effects of Sponge City Projects Applying the Geodesign Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yaoxue Li

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Seoul, 163 Seoulsiripdaero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02504, Korea)

  • Youngmin Kim

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Seoul, 163 Seoulsiripdaero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02504, Korea)

Abstract

This study aims is to verify the effects of sponge city projects focusing on the aspect of water pollutant control and urban flood control, applying the geodesign framework as an integrated planning method that can evaluate alternatives against the impacts of the designs. The study analyzed the effects of sponge city projects in Harbin, Quzhou, and Sanya, China. Three LULC scenarios are proposed based on the geodesign framework, and the spatial distribution and quantitative values are simulated by the InVEST NDR model and urban flood model study. By comparing different scenarios, the study proved the current sponge project could improve the water pollutant control capability by 11–18% and the stormwater control capability by 0.4–6.3%. If the city-wide green infrastructure network is introduced with sponge projects, the water pollutant control capability can increase by 9–15% and the stormwater control capability can increase by 0.8–2.9%. These results show that the current sponge projects can improve the city’s sustainability and be helpful strategies to fight climate change and global warming.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaoxue Li & Youngmin Kim, 2022. "Analysis of Effects of Sponge City Projects Applying the Geodesign Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:455-:d:777050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher J Pettit & Scott Hawken & Carmela Ticzon & Simone Z Leao & Aida E Afrooz & Scott N Lieske & Tess Canfield & Hrishi Ballal & Carl Steinitz, 2019. "Breaking down the silos through geodesign – Envisioning Sydney’s urban future," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1387-1404, October.
    2. Keyu Luo & Zhenyu Wang & Wei Sha & Jiansheng Wu & Hongliang Wang & Qingliang Zhu, 2021. "Integrating Sponge City Concept and Neural Network into Land Suitability Assessment: Evidence from a Satellite Town of Shenzhen Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Xu Yang & Guangxing Ji & Chong Wang & Jingping Zuo & Haiqing Yang & Jianhua Xu & Ruishan Chen, 2019. "Modeling nitrogen and phosphorus export with InVEST model in Bosten Lake basin of Northwest China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Francisco Javier Moreno Marimbaldo & Miguel-Ángel Manso-Callejo & Ramon Alcarria, 2018. "A Methodological Approach to Using Geodesign in Transmission Line Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Keith M. Reynolds & Philip J. Murphy & Steven Paplanus, 2017. "Toward Geodesign for Watershed Restoration on the Fremont-Winema National Forest, Pacific Northwest, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Zhang & Bingbing Huang & Xinming Chen & Congmou Zhu & Muye Gan, 2022. "Multidimensional Evaluation of the Quality of Rural Life Using Big Data from the Perspective of Common Prosperity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Meiyan Gao & Zongmin Wang & Haibo Yang, 2022. "Review of Urban Flood Resilience: Insights from Scientometric and Systematic Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Yoonshin Kwak & Brian Deal & Grant Mosey, 2021. "Landscape Design toward Urban Resilience: Bridging Science and Physical Design Coupling Sociohydrological Modeling and Design Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Kwak, Yoonshin & Deal, Brian & Heavisides, Tom, 2021. "A large scale multi criteria suitability analysis for identifying solar development potential: A decision support approach for the state of Illinois, USA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 554-567.
    5. Kaihang Zhou & Scott Hawken, 2023. "Climate-Related Sea Level Rise and Coastal Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure Futures: Landscape Planning Scenarios for Negotiating Risks and Opportunities in Australian Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Tikuye, Birhan Getachew & Gill, Laurence & Rusnak, Milos & Manjunatha, Busnur R., 2023. "Modelling the impacts of changing land use and climate on sediment and nutrient retention in Lake Tana Basin, Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    7. Marlene Marques & Keith M. Reynolds & Susete Marques & Marco Marto & Steve Paplanus & José G. Borges, 2021. "A Participatory and Spatial Multicriteria Decision Approach to Prioritize the Allocation of Ecosystem Services to Management Units," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    8. David Cleland & Keith Reynolds & Robert Vaughan & Barbara Schrader & Harbin Li & Larry Laing, 2017. "Terrestrial Condition Assessment for National Forests of the USDA Forest Service in the Continental US," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Parisa Zare & Christopher Pettit & Simone Leao & Ori Gudes & Balamurugan Soundararaj, 2022. "Geo-Design in Planning for Bicycling: An Evidence-Based Approach for Collaborative Bicycling Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Indrajit, Agung & van Loenen, Bastiaan & Suprajaka, & Jaya, Virgo Eresta & Ploeger, Hendrik & Lemmen, Christiaan & van Oosterom, Peter, 2021. "Implementation of the spatial plan information package for improving ease of doing business in Indonesian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:455-:d:777050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.