IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i11p2144-d119846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Terrestrial Condition Assessment for National Forests of the USDA Forest Service in the Continental US

Author

Listed:
  • David Cleland

    (USDA Forest Service, National Forest System, Rhinelander, WI 54501, USA)

  • Keith Reynolds

    (USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA)

  • Robert Vaughan

    (Redcastle Resources, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT 84103, USA)

  • Barbara Schrader

    (USDA Forest Service, Alaska Region, Juneau, AK 99801, USA)

  • Harbin Li

    (USDA Forest Service, National Forest System, Washington, DC 20250, USA)

  • Larry Laing

    (USDA Forest Service, National Forest System, Washington, DC 20250, USA)

Abstract

The terrestrial condition assessment (TCA) evaluates effects of uncharacteristic stressors and disturbance agents on land-type associations (LTAs) to identify restoration opportunities on national forest system (NFS) lands in the United States. A team of agency scientists and managers, representing a broad array of natural resource disciplines, developed a logic structure for the TCA to identify appropriate data sources to support analyses. Primary national data sources included observed insect- and pathogen-induced mortality, key critical loads for soil and the atmosphere, long term seasonal departures in temperature and precipitation, road densities, uncharacteristic wildfires, historical fire regime departure, wildfire potential, insect and pathogen risk, and vegetation departure from natural range of variability. The TCA was implemented with the ecosystem management decision support (EMDS) system, a spatial decision support system for landscape analysis and planning. EMDS uses logic models to interpret data, synthesizes information over successive layers of logic topics, and draws inferences about the ecological integrity of LTAs as an initial step to identifying high priority LTAs for landscape restoration on NFS lands. Results from the analysis showed that about 74 percent of NFS lands had moderate or better overall ecological integrity. Major impacts to ecological integrity included risk of mortality due to insects and disease, extent of current mortality, extent of areas with high and very high wildfire hazard potential, uncharacteristically severe wildfire, and elevated temperatures. In the discussion, we consider implications for agency performance reporting on restoration activities, and subsequent possible steps, including strategic and tactical planning for restoration. The objective of the paper is to describe the TCA framework with results from a national scale application on NFS lands.

Suggested Citation

  • David Cleland & Keith Reynolds & Robert Vaughan & Barbara Schrader & Harbin Li & Larry Laing, 2017. "Terrestrial Condition Assessment for National Forests of the USDA Forest Service in the Continental US," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:2144-:d:119846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/2144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/2144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith M. Reynolds & Philip J. Murphy & Steven Paplanus, 2017. "Toward Geodesign for Watershed Restoration on the Fremont-Winema National Forest, Pacific Northwest, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pete Bettinger & Krista Merry & Jonathan Stober, 2022. "A Hierarchical Binary Process Model to Assess Deviation from Desired Ecological Condition across a Broad Forested Landscape in Alabama," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Katelyn P. Driscoll & D. Max Smith, 2021. "Development of Riparian and Groundwater-Dependent Ecosystem Assessments for National Forests in the Western U.S," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Lars Y. Pomara & Danny C. Lee, 2021. "The Role of Regional Ecological Assessment in Quantifying Ecosystem Services for Forest Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaoxue Li & Youngmin Kim, 2022. "Analysis of Effects of Sponge City Projects Applying the Geodesign Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Marlene Marques & Keith M. Reynolds & Susete Marques & Marco Marto & Steve Paplanus & José G. Borges, 2021. "A Participatory and Spatial Multicriteria Decision Approach to Prioritize the Allocation of Ecosystem Services to Management Units," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:2144-:d:119846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.