IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i12p2284-d1001998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Habitat Diversity and Tourists’ Visual Preference in Urban Wetland Park

Author

Listed:
  • Jiani Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150006, China
    Key Laboratory of Cold Region Urban and Rural Human Settlement Environment Science and Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin 150006, China)

  • Xun Zhu

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150006, China
    Key Laboratory of Cold Region Urban and Rural Human Settlement Environment Science and Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin 150006, China)

  • Ming Gao

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150006, China
    Key Laboratory of Cold Region Urban and Rural Human Settlement Environment Science and Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin 150006, China)

Abstract

The increasing number of visitors to wetland parks has caused varying degrees of impact on wetland life. How to reduce the damage to wetland biodiversity caused by recreational activities in parks, improve tourists’ recreational experience, and balance the relationship between the two are urgent problems that need to be solved. Therefore, four urban wetland parks were selected as subjects for this study. The present study utilized social media data to study the diversity of urban wetland habitats and tourists’ wetland landscape preferences from the spatial dimension and explore the relationship between the two. This is a practice different from the traditional ecological research (survey, measurement, monitoring, questionnaire survey) of wetland habitat diversity assessment. The research revealed the following findings: (1) There was a significant positive correlation between habitat saturation and positive artificial elements, such as landscape structures and aerial walkways; (2) Landscape complexity is negatively correlated with landscape instantaneity and wilderness degree; (3) Habitat diversity was negatively correlated with landscape instantaneity but positively correlated with naturalness and positive artificial elements. This study proposes wetland habitat construction as a strategy to optimize the management of habitat diversity in urban wetland parks and enhance its ecological education function.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiani Zhang & Xun Zhu & Ming Gao, 2022. "The Relationship between Habitat Diversity and Tourists’ Visual Preference in Urban Wetland Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2284-:d:1001998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2284/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2284/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Marine & Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz & Luis Santos-Cid & María F. Schmitz, 2022. "Can We Foresee Landscape Interest? Maximum Entropy Applied to Social Media Photographs: A Case Study in Madrid," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Ling Qiu & Anders Busse Nielsen, 2015. "Are Perceived Sensory Dimensions a Reliable Tool for Urban Green Space Assessment and Planning?," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(7), pages 834-854, October.
    3. Xiaoyang Zhu & Shang-Chia Chiou, 2022. "A Study on the Sustainable Development of Historic District Landscapes Based on Place Attachment among Tourists: A Case Study of Taiping Old Street, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Douglas J. Spieles, 2022. "Wetland Construction, Restoration, and Integration: A Comparative Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Qureshi, Salman & Tarashkar, Mahsa & Matloobi, Mansour & Wang, Zhifang & Rahimi, Akbar, 2022. "Understanding the dynamics of urban horticulture by socially-oriented practices and populace perception: Seeking future outlook through a comprehensive review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    6. Huai, Songyao & Chen, Fen & Liu, Song & Canters, Frank & Van de Voorde, Tim, 2022. "Using social media photos and computer vision to assess cultural ecosystem services and landscape features in urban parks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    7. Fan Tang & Jianping Yang & Yanxia Wang & Qiuling Ge, 2022. "Analysis of the Image of Global Glacier Tourism Destinations from the Perspective of Tourists," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian Gao & Rui Song & Ling Zhu & Ling Qiu, 2019. "What Characteristics of Urban Green Spaces and Recreational Activities Do Self-Reported Stressed Individuals Like? A Case Study of Baoji, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. John E. Gordon, 2023. "Climate Change and Geotourism: Impacts, Challenges, and Opportunities," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Rajat K. Chakraborti & James S. Bays, 2023. "Constructed Wetlands Using Treated Membrane Concentrate for Coastal Wetland Restoration and the Renewal of Multiple Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Sanaz Memari & Mahdieh Pazhouhanfar & Patrik Grahn, 2021. "Perceived Sensory Dimensions of Green Areas: An Experimental Study on Stress Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Abigail Paradise-Vit & Aviad Elyashar & Yarden Aronson, 2024. "Automated photo filtering for tourism domain using deep and active learning: the case of Israeli and worldwide cities on instagram," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 553-582, September.
    6. Jing Xie & Shixian Luo & Katsunori Furuya & Takahide Kagawa & Mian Yang, 2022. "A Preferred Road to Mental Restoration in the Chinese Classical Garden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Fang Zhang & Qi Liu & Xi Zhou, 2022. "Vitality Evaluation of Public Spaces in Historical and Cultural Blocks Based on Multi-Source Data, a Case Study of Suzhou Changmen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Schirpke, Uta & Ghermandi, Andrea & Sinclair, Michael & Van Berkel, Derek & Fox, Nathan & Vargas, Leonardo & Willemen, Louise, 2023. "Emerging technologies for assessing ecosystem services: A synthesis of opportunities and challenges," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    9. Haipeng Zhang & Kangning Xiong & Guangyu Fei & Ao Jin & Shirong Zhang, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Conservation Intentions of Visitors to a World Heritage Site: A Case Study of Libo Karst," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Mihaela-Iuliana Desculțu Grigore & Amalia Niță & Ionuț-Adrian Drăguleasa & Mirela Mazilu, 2024. "Geotourism, a New Perspective of Post-COVID-19-Pandemic Relaunch through Travel Agencies—Case Study: Bucegi Natural Park, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-49, January.
    11. Jiao Zhang & Danqing Li & Shuguang Ning & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Sustainable Urban Green Blue Space (UGBS) and Public Participation: Integrating Multisensory Landscape Perception from Online Reviews," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-29, July.
    12. Bo-Wei Zhu & Ying He Xiao & Wei-Quan Zheng & Lei Xiong & Xia Yun He & Jian-Yi Zheng & Yen-Ching Chuang, 2022. "A Hybrid Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making Model for Evaluating the Esthetic Expression of Environmental Design Schemes," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    13. Congying An & Jinglan Liu & Qiaohui Liu & Yuqi Liu & Xiaoli Fan & Yishen Hu, 2022. "How Perceived Sensory Dimensions of Forest Park Are Associated with Stress Restoration in Beijing?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Vera Ferreira & Ana Paula Barreira & Luís Loures & Dulce Antunes & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Engagement on Nature-Based Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    15. Jianping Yang & Yanxia Wang & Fan Tang & Xinyu Guo & Hongju Chen & Guangxi Ding, 2023. "Ice-and-snow tourism in China: trends and influencing factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Aida Nosrati & Mahdieh Pazhouhanfar & Chongxian Chen & Patrik Grahn, 2024. "Designing Stress-Relieving Small Inner-City Park Environments for Teenagers," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Tian Gao & Ling Zhu & Tian Zhang & Rui Song & Yuanqun Zhang & Ling Qiu, 2019. "Is an Environment with High Biodiversity the Most Attractive for Human Recreation? A Case Study in Baoji, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2284-:d:1001998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.