IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i5p460-d542873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Scenic Beauty of Geosites and Its Relation to Their Scientific Value and Geoscience Knowledge of Tourists: A Case Study from Southeastern Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Getaneh Addis Tessema

    (Division of Geography and Tourism, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
    Department of Tourism and Hotel Management, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar P.O. Box 79, Ethiopia)

  • Jean Poesen

    (Division of Geography and Tourism, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
    Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Kraśnicka 2cd, 20-718 Lublin, Poland)

  • Gert Verstraeten

    (Division of Geography and Tourism, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Anton Van Rompaey

    (Division of Geography and Tourism, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Jan van der Borg

    (Division of Geography and Tourism, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

Scenic beauty is one of the most-commonly used indicators in the inventory and assessment of geosites for geoconservation, geoheritage management and geotourism development. It is an important driver of tourists to visit natural areas and it also provides support for the protection of natural heritage. Previous studies on scenic beauty mainly focused on landscape preference and physical characteristics of geosites that affect scenic beauty appreciation. The relationships between the scenic beauty of geosites, their scientific value and the geoscience knowledge of tourists has not been empirically investigated in detail. Hence, this study investigates this relationship using 34 geosites from southeastern Spain. For this purpose, 29 respondents with a geoscience background and who all visited the 34 geosites, 43 respondents with a geoscience background but who did not visit the geosites, and 104 respondents with no geoscience background and who did not visit the geosites, participated in a survey. The first group rated the scenic beauty and the scientific value of the geosites based on a direct field visit during which the scientific background of these geosites was given. On the other hand, the latter two groups rated scenic beauty using representative photos of the geosites. A five-point Likert scale was used to rate the scenic beauty and the scientific value of the geosites. We found a significant relationship between the scenic beauty of geosites and their scientific value, and this relationship becomes more significant if the geoscientific knowledge of the respondents increases. One-way ANOVA results indicated that a geoscience background contributed to higher perceived scenic beauty, especially for those geosites that in general were considered as more scenic by all the respondent groups. It was also found that geosites with viewpoints received in general higher scenic beauty and scientific value ratings.

Suggested Citation

  • Getaneh Addis Tessema & Jean Poesen & Gert Verstraeten & Anton Van Rompaey & Jan van der Borg, 2021. "The Scenic Beauty of Geosites and Its Relation to Their Scientific Value and Geoscience Knowledge of Tourists: A Case Study from Southeastern Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-27, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:460-:d:542873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/460/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/460/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaime Martínez-Valderrama & Emilio Guirado & Fernando T. Maestre, 2020. "Unraveling Misunderstandings about Desertification: The Paradoxical Case of the Tabernas-Sorbas Basin in Southeast Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Anna V. Mikhailenko & Dmitry A. Ruban, 2019. "Environment of Viewpoint Geosites: Evidence from the Western Caucasus," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Yi-Min Chang Chien & Steve Carver & Alexis Comber, 2021. "An Exploratory Analysis of Expert and Nonexpert-Based Land-Scape Aesthetics Evaluations: A Case Study from Wales," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Carolina Perpiña Castillo & Eloína Coll Aliaga & Carlo Lavalle & José Carlos Martínez Llario, 2020. "An Assessment and Spatial Modelling of Agricultural Land Abandonment in Spain (2015–2030)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Kirillova, Ksenia & Fu, Xiaoxiao & Lehto, Xinran & Cai, Liping, 2014. "What makes a destination beautiful? Dimensions of tourist aesthetic judgment," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 282-293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Efthimios Bakogiannis & Chryssy Potsiou & Konstantinos Apostolopoulos & Charalampos Kyriakidis, 2021. "Crowdsourced Geospatial Infrastructure for Coastal Management and Planning for Emerging Post COVID-19 Tourism Demand," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Theano S. Terkenli, 2021. "Research Advances in Tourism-Landscape Interrelations: An Editorial," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-8, September.
    3. Ruban, Dmitry A. & Mikhailenko, Anna V. & Yashalova, Natalia N., 2022. "Valuable geoheritage resources: Potential versus exploitation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Anna V. Mikhailenko & Svetlana O. Zorina & Natalia N. Yashalova & Dmitry A. Ruban, 2023. "Promoting Geosites on Web-Pages: An Assessment of the Quality and Quantity of Information in Real Cases," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Filocamo & Gianluigi Di Paola & Lino Mastrobuono & Carmen M. Rosskopf, 2020. "MoGeo, a Mobile Application to Promote Geotourism in Molise Region (Southern Italy)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Kirillova, Ksenia, 2023. "A review of aesthetics research in tourism:," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Habibi, Tahereh & Ponedelnik, Alena A. & Yashalova, Natalia N. & Ruban, Dmitry A., 2018. "Urban geoheritage complexity: Evidence of a unique natural resource from Shiraz city in Iran," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 85-94.
    4. Kim, Yeon-Su & Rodrigues, Marcos & Robinne, François-Nicolas, 2021. "Economic drivers of global fire activity: A critical review using the DPSIR framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Ana Cláudia Amaro & Luisa M. Martinez & Filipe R. Ramos & Karla Menezes & Silvio Menezes, 2023. "An overstimulated consumer in a highly visual world: the moderating effect of the highly sensitive person trait on the attitude towards the ad," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1429-1458, September.
    6. Dmitry A. Ruban, 2018. "Karst as Important Resource for Geopark-Based Tourism: Current State and Biases," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Min Shao & Derong Lin, 2021. "A Study on How the Five Senses Are Affected When Tourists Experience Towns with Forest Characteristics: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Data of Fujian, Guangdong and Sichuan in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Olga P. Kormazina & Dmitry A. Ruban & Natalia N. Yashalova, 2022. "Hotel Naming in Russian Cities: An Imprint of Foreign Cultures and Languages between Europe and Asia," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Zhou, Long & Li, Yixin & Cheng, Jialin & Qin, Yu & Shen, Guoqiang & Li, Bin & Yang, Huajie & Li, Sihong, 2023. "Understanding the aesthetic perceptions and image impressions experienced by tourists walking along tourism trails through continuous cityscapes in Macau," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    10. Lee, Kai-Sean, 2022. "Culinary aesthetics: World-traveling with culinary arts," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Daxin Dong & Xiaowei Xu & Yat Fung Wong, 2019. "Estimating the Impact of Air Pollution on Inbound Tourism in China: An Analysis Based on Regression Discontinuity Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Adam Pawlewicz & Katarzyna Pawlewicz, 2023. "The Risk of Agricultural Land Abandonment as a Socioeconomic Challenge for the Development of Agriculture in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Ar. R. T. Hidayat & Corinthias P. M. Sianipar & Shizuka Hashimoto & Satoshi Hoshino & Muhammad Dimyati & Ahmad E. Yustika, 2023. "Personal Cognition and Implicit Constructs Affecting Preferential Decisions on Farmland Ownership: Multiple Case Studies in Kediri, East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Boqian Wei & Tingting Yang & Chih-Hsing Liu, 2021. "“Can Intelligence Make You Happy?” The Influence of Tourists’ Cultural Sustainability and Intelligence on Their Flow Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Anna V. Mikhailenko & Dmitry A. Ruban, 2019. "Environment of Viewpoint Geosites: Evidence from the Western Caucasus," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-10, June.
    16. Francisco Valera & Luis Bolonio & Abel La Calle & Eulalia Moreno, 2022. "Deployment of Solar Energy at the Expense of Conservation Sensitive Areas Precludes Its Classification as an Environmentally Sustainable Activity," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Yuri A. Fedorov & Dmitry A. Ruban, 2019. "Geoheritage Resource of Small Mud Lakes in the Semi-Arid Environments of the Russian South," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, April.
    18. Weiwei Zhou & Li-Yu Chen & Rung-Jiun Chou, 2021. "Important Factors Affecting Rural Tourists’ Aesthetic Experience: A Case Study of Zoumatang Village in Ningbo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    19. Sallam, Emad S. & Ruban, Dmitry A. & Ermolaev, Vladimir A., 2022. "Geoheritage resources and new direction of infrastructural growth in Egypt: From geosite assessment to policy development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Ionuț-Alexandru Spânu & Alexandru Ozunu & Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag, 2022. "A Comparative View of Agri-Environmental Indicators and Stakeholders’ Assessment of Their Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:460-:d:542873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.