IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i3p244-d508119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping Rural Settlements from Landsat and Sentinel Time Series by Integrating Pixel- and Object-Based Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Ru Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Rural settlements account for 45% of the world’s population and are targeted places for poverty eradication. However, compared to urban footprints, the distribution of rural settlements is not well characterized in most existing land use and land cover maps because of their patchy and scattered organization and relative stability over time. In this study, we proposed a pixel- and object-based method to map rural settlements by employing spectral-texture-temporal information from Landsat and Sentinel time series. Spectral indices (maximum normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and minimum normalized difference built-up index (NDBI composite) and texture indices (vertical transmit and vertical receive (VV) polarization of mean synthetic aperture radar (SAR) composite) were calculated from all available Landsat and Sentinel-1A data from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. These features were then stacked for segmentation to extract potential rural settlement objects. To better differentiate settlements from bare soil, the gradient of annual NDVI maximum (namely, gradient of change, use gradient for simplicity) from 1 January 1987 to 31 December 2018 was used. The rural training samples were selected from global urban footprint (GUF) products with a post filtering process to remove sample noise. Scatter plots between pixel- and object-based values per feature were delineated by t-distribution ellipses to determine the thresholds. Finally, pixel- and object-based thresholds were applied to four features (NDVI, NDBI, VV, gradient) in Google Earth Engine (GEE) to obtain the distribution of rural settlements in eight selected Asian regions. The derived maps of rural settlements showed consistent accuracy, with a producer’s accuracy (PA) of 0.87, user’s accuracy (UA) of 0.93 and overall accuracy (OA) reaching 90% in different landscape conditions, which are better than existing land cover products.

Suggested Citation

  • Ru Xu, 2021. "Mapping Rural Settlements from Landsat and Sentinel Time Series by Integrating Pixel- and Object-Based Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:244-:d:508119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/244/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/244/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diego Firmino Costa da Silva & J. Paul Elhorst & Raul da Mota Silveira Neto, 2017. "Urban and rural population growth in a spatial panel of municipalities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6), pages 894-908, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Congjie Cao & Wei Song, 2022. "Discerning Spatiotemporal Patterns and Policy Drivers of Rural Settlement Changes from 1962 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanting Tang & Jinlong Gao & Wen Chen, 2022. "The Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Population in the Yangtze River Delta, China: An Urban Hierarchy Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Francesc Amat & Pablo Beramendi & Miriam Hortas-Rico & Vicente Rios, 2020. "How inequality shapes political participation: The role of spatial patterns of political competition," Working Papers. Collection B: Regional and sectoral economics 2002, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    3. Miriam Hortas-Rico & Vicente Rios, 2020. "Is there an optimal size for local governments? A spatial panel data model approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 958-973, July.
    4. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro & Lei Bao, 2021. "Impact of next‐generation access networks on the innovation efficiency of Portuguese municipalities: A spatial econometrics approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 1615-1637, October.
    5. Jie Liu & Chao Bi, 2019. "Effects of Higher Education Levels on Total Factor Productivity Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Massimo Armenise & Federico Benassi & Maria Carella & Roberta Misuraca, 2024. "Accessibility and Older and Foreign Populations: Exploring Local Spatial Heterogeneities across Italy," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Qianli Zhou & Shaoyao Zhang & Wei Deng & Junfeng Wang, 2023. "Has Rural Public Services Weakened Population Migration in the Sichuan–Chongqing Region? Spatiotemporal Association Patterns and Their Influencing Factors," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, June.
    8. João Lourenço Marques & Muhammad Tufail & Jan Wolf & Mara Madaleno, 2021. "Population Growth and the Local Provision of Services: The Role of Primary Schools in Portugal," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(2), pages 309-335, April.
    9. Grazyna Karmowska & Andrzej Sobczyk, 2020. "Analysis of Szczecin Metropolitan Area’s Growth Potential," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 931-946.
    10. Gen-Fu Feng & Bo Sui & Min-Yi Dong & Chun-xia Jiang & Chun-Ping Chang, 2018. "Border is better than distance? Contagious corruption in one belt one road economies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1909-1928, July.
    11. Alvarez-Dias, Marcos & D'Hombres, Beatrice & Ghisetti, Claudia & Pontarollo, Nicola & Dijkstra, Lewis, 2018. "The Determinants of Population Growth: Literature review and empirical analysis," Working Papers 2018-10, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
    12. Jesús Peiró‐Palomino & Andrés J. Picazo‐Tadeo & Vicente Rios, 2020. "Well‐being in European regions: Does government quality matter?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(3), pages 555-582, June.
    13. Yisheng Peng & Jiahui Liu & Tianyao Zhang & Xiangyang Li, 2021. "The Relationship between Urban Population Density Distribution and Land Use in Guangzhou, China: A Spatial Spillover Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
    14. David N Wear & Jeffrey P Prestemon, 2019. "Spatiotemporal downscaling of global population and income scenarios for the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Guilherme Mendes Resende & Diego Firmino Costa da Silva & Luís Abel da Silva Filho, 2018. "Evaluation of the Brazilian regional development funds," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 38(2), pages 191-217, October.
    16. Vicente Rios & Beatriz Manotas-Hidalgo & Lisa Gianmoena, 2021. "Spatial Inequality, Civil Conflict and Cells: A Dynamic Spatial Probit Approach," Documentos de Trabajo - Lan Gaiak Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra 2110, Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra.
    17. Álvarez, Inmaculada C. & Orea, Luis & Perez-Mendez, Jose A., 2019. "Rural and agricultural development by land consolidation: a spatial production analysis of Asturias´ parishes," Efficiency Series Papers 2019/04, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    18. Zizi Goschin & Mihai Antonia & Horia Tigau, 2021. "Entrepreneurship Recovery in Romania after the Great Recession. A Dynamic Spatial Panel Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-12, September.
    19. Ji Uk Kim, 2020. "Technology diffusion, absorptive capacity, and income convergence for Asian developing countries: a dynamic spatial panel approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 569-598, August.
    20. Margherita Carlucci & Gloria Polinesi & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Agglomeration vs amenities? Unraveling the latent engine of growth in metropolitan Greece," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(9), pages 2491-2509, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:244-:d:508119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.