IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i12p581-d1550417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Performance of the Target Companies: Before and After Acquisitions

Author

Listed:
  • Burak Dogan

    (Banking and Insurance Program, Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Vocational School, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul 34353, Turkey)

  • Umut Ugurlu

    (Department of International Finance, Faculty of Economics, Administrative, and Social Sciences, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul 34353, Turkey)

Abstract

This study investigates the financial performance of target companies involved in mergers and acquisitions (M&As), aiming to reveal the dynamics affecting these organizations pre- and post-transaction. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset, we analyze the financial outcomes of M&A deals globally, spanning from 2010 to 2019. Employing various financial ratios, such as liquidity ratios, profitability measures, leverage ratios, asset management ratios, and market valuation metrics, this research provides an understanding of how M&As influence the financial performance of target companies. The key findings suggest that target companies experience significant changes in their financial ratios post-acquisition, with liquidity and profitability ratios showing marked fluctuations. The study shows that the method of payment (cash vs. non-cash) and the size of the deal significantly influence the post-acquisition financial performance of target companies. Cash-based and lower-valued deals are found to have a more positive impact on financial stability and growth metrics. This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by highlighting the marginal effects of acquisition strategies on target companies’ financial performance. Our findings provide practical insights for potential acquirers, suggesting that the choice of acquisition method and deal size can significantly affect the financial outcomes of M&A activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Burak Dogan & Umut Ugurlu, 2024. "Financial Performance of the Target Companies: Before and After Acquisitions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:581-:d:1550417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/12/581/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/12/581/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon M. Phillips & Alexei Zhdanov, 2013. "R&D and the Incentives from Merger and Acquisition Activity," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(1), pages 34-78.
    2. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis And The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 589-609, September.
    3. Altunbas, Yener & Marqués, David, 2008. "Mergers and acquisitions and bank performance in Europe: The role of strategic similarities," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 204-222.
    4. Svetlana Grigorieva & Tatiana Petrunina, 2015. "The performance of mergers and acquisitions in emerging capital markets: new angle," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 377-403, October.
    5. Masulis, Ronald W. & Simsir, Serif Aziz, 2018. "Deal Initiation in Mergers and Acquisitions," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(6), pages 2389-2430, December.
    6. Ambrose, Brent W. & Megginson, William L., 1992. "The Role of Asset Structure, Ownership Structure, and Takeover Defenses in Determining Acquisition Likelihood," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 575-589, December.
    7. Palepu, Krishna G., 1986. "Predicting takeover targets : A methodological and empirical analysis," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 3-35, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Betton, Sandra & Davis, Frederick & Walker, Thomas, 2018. "Rumor rationales: The impact of message justification on article credibility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 271-287.
    2. Espahbodi, Hassan & Espahbodi, Pouran, 2003. "Binary choice models and corporate takeover," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 549-574, April.
    3. Ronan Powell & Alfred Yawson, 2012. "Internal Restructuring and Firm Survival," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 12(4), pages 435-467, December.
    4. Frederick Davis & Svetlana Davis & Xiaoyang Sha & Thomas Walker, 2022. "The impact of takeover anticipation on rival firms," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(7-8), pages 1264-1288, July.
    5. Clas Bergström & Theodore Eisenberg & Stefan Sundgren & Martin T. Wells, 2005. "The Fate of Firms: Explaining Mergers and Bankruptcies," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 49-85, March.
    6. Olivier Dessaint & Jacques Olivier & Clemens A Otto & David Thesmar, 2021. "CAPM-Based Company (Mis)valuations [Credit lines as monitored liquidity insurance: Theory and evidence]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(1), pages 1-66.
    7. Abe De Jong & Philip T. Fliers, 2020. "Predicting Takeover Targets: Long-Run Evidence from the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 343-368, September.
    8. Fidrmuc, Jana P. & Xia, Chunling, 2019. "M&A deal initiation and managerial motivation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 320-343.
    9. Basnet, Anup & Davis, Frederick & Walker, Thomas & Zhao, Kun, 2021. "The effect of securities class action lawsuits on mergers and acquisitions," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    10. Tunyi, Abongeh A. & Ntim, Collins G. & Danbolt, Jo, 2019. "Decoupling management inefficiency: Myopia, hyperopia and takeover likelihood," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-20.
    11. Paul Gompers & Joy Ishii & Andrew Metrick, 2003. "Corporate Governance and Equity Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 107-156.
    12. Alexander Hölzl & Sebastian Lobe, 2016. "Predicting above-median and below-median growth rates," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 105-133, January.
    13. Sarah Osborne & Dean Katselas & Larelle Chapple, 2012. "The preferences of private equity investors in selecting target acquisitions: An international investigation," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 37(3), pages 361-389, December.
    14. Gider, Jasmin, 2014. "Do SEC Detections Deter Insider Trading? Evidence from Earnings Announcements," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100343, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    15. Olha Bielienkova & Anton Moholivets & Yana Loktionova, 2021. "Measurement Of The Level Of Economic Security Of Enterprises By The Indicator Of The Attractiveness For Hostile Takeovers," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 7(5).
    16. García-Gallego, Ana & Mures-Quintana, María-Jesús, 2013. "La muestra de empresas en los modelos de predicción del fracaso: influencia en los resultados de clasificación || The Sample of Firms in Business Failure Prediction Models: Influence on Classification," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 15(1), pages 133-150, June.
    17. (Jennifer) Wu, Szu-Yin & Chung, Kee H., 2019. "Corporate innovation, likelihood to be acquired, and takeover premiums," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Trimbath, S. & Frydman, H. & Frydman, R., 2000. "Corporate Inefficiency and the Risk of Takeover," Working Papers 00-14, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
    19. Guanping Zhou, 2019. "Financial distress prevention in China: Does gender of board of directors matter?," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(6), pages 1-8.
    20. Hunter, John & Isachenkova, Natalia, 2006. "Aggregate economy risk and company failure: An examination of UK quoted firms in the early 1990s," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 911-919, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:581-:d:1550417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.