IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i11p513-d1521918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Drivers of Corporate Sustainability Performance Disclosures Using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Najul Laskar

    (School of Management, IILM University, Knowledge Park 2, Greater Noida 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India)

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to analyze the factors influencing the corporate sustainability performance disclosures of companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 framework. This research is based on a sample of 434 firms listed on the BSE from 2017 to 2022. According to the content analysis method, the disclosure score of 434 non-financial companies is 79% (approximately), suggesting that, on an average, the sample companies have revealed 79% of the GRI-specified elements in their sustainability reports. The outcomes of the regression models indicate that profitability, firm size, innovation, board size, gender diversity, sustainability committee, and industry type are major drivers of corporate sustainability performance disclosure. Furthermore, research identified significant differences in the determinants of such practices between high-polluting and low-polluting companies. This research aims to elucidate the intricate dynamics affecting corporate sustainability performance by examining a diverse array of concerns. It employs meticulous data analysis to identify critical elements influencing sustainability disclosure. These findings may assist corporate managers, investors, policymakers, and stakeholders in comprehending the critical aspects to consider when formulating strategies that promote sustainability and enhance long-term value maximization.

Suggested Citation

  • Najul Laskar, 2024. "Assessing the Drivers of Corporate Sustainability Performance Disclosures Using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Framework," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:513-:d:1521918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/11/513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/11/513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chau, Gerald & Gray, Sidney J., 2010. "Family ownership, board independence and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Hong Kong," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 93-109.
    2. Robert Padgett & Jose Galan, 2010. "The Effect of R&D Intensity on Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 407-418, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melinda Timea FÜLÖP & Mirela-Oana PINTEA, 2014. "Effects Of The New Regulation And Corporate Governance Of The Audit Profession," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4, pages 545-554, July.
    2. Robert O. Etengu & Dr. Tobias O. Olweny & Dr. Josephat O. Oluoch, 2020. "Voluntary Disclosure of Financial and Capital Market Data and Earnings Management: Empirical Evidence from Uganda," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 1-3.
    3. Chakraborty, Atreya & Gao, Lucia Silva & Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2019. "Managerial risk taking incentives, corporate social responsibility and firm risk," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 58-72.
    4. Jun Chen & Wang Dong & Jamie Tong & Feida Zhang, 2018. "Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 135-157, June.
    5. Rupjyoti Saha & K. C. Kabra, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure: A Synthesis of Empirical Studies," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 117-138, July.
    6. Görg, Holger & Hanley, Aoife & Hoffmann, Stefan & Seric, Adnan, 2016. "When Do Multinational Companies Consider Corporate Social Responsibility? A Multi-Country Study in Sub-Saharan Africa," KCG Working Papers 1, Kiel Centre for Globalization (KCG).
    7. Xilin He & Renato Lopes da Costa & Debing Ni & Wucheng Han, 2024. "How Quasi-Internal Resources Enhance Firm Performance During Large-Scale Emergencies: The Role of Trade-Off Between CSR and Business Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Wei Shan & Chu Zhang & Jingyi Wang, 2018. "Internal Social Network, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation: Evidence from New Ventures in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    9. Cuadrado-Ballesteros, Beatriz & Rodríguez-Ariza, Lázaro & García-Sánchez, Isabel-María, 2015. "The role of independent directors at family firms in relation to corporate social responsibility disclosures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 890-901.
    10. Abhijith G. Acharya & David Gras & Ryan Krause, 2022. "Socially Oriented Shareholder Activism Targets: Explaining Activists’ Corporate Target Selection Using Corporate Opportunity Structures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 307-323, June.
    11. Zhu, Minghao & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Zhou, Honggeng, 2021. "Diversify or concentrate: The impact of customer concentration on corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    12. Claudia Arena & Giovanna Michelon, 2018. "A matter of control or identity? Family firms' environmental reporting decisions along the corporate life cycle," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1596-1608, December.
    13. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, March.
    14. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-043 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Pasquale Ruggiero & Sebastiano Cupertino, 2018. "CSR Strategic Approach, Financial Resources and Corporate Social Performance: The Mediating Effect of Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Ju Hyoung Park & Hyun-Young Park & Ho-Young Lee, 2018. "The Effect of Social Ties between Outside and Inside Directors on the Association between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Zhang, Zhongqingyang & Zhu, Huiming & Zhou, Zhongbao & Zou, Kai, 2022. "How does innovation matter for sustainable performance? Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 251-265.
    18. Giuliana Birindelli & Stefano Dell’Atti & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Marco Savioli, 2018. "Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Chang Liu & Stephanie Lu Wang & Dan Li, 2022. "Hidden in a group? Market reactions to multi‐violator corporate social irresponsibility disclosures," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 160-179, January.
    20. Akrum Helfaya & Tantawy Moussa, 2017. "Do Board's Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1061-1077, December.
    21. Thomas Fischer & Angelika Sawczyn, 2013. "The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance and the role of innovation: evidence from German listed firms," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 27-52, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:513-:d:1521918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.