IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i12p490-d1284611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Emotion Magnitude Effect: Navigating Market Dynamics Amidst Supply Chain Events

Author

Listed:
  • Shawn McCarthy

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Gita Alaghband

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

During the volatile market period of 2019–2021, characterized by geopolitical shifts, economic sanctions, pandemics, natural disasters, and wars, the global market presented a complex landscape for financial decision making and motivated this study. This study makes two groundbreaking and novel contributions. First, we augment Plunket’s emotional research and leverage the emotional classification algorithm in Fin-Emotion to introduce a novel quantitative metric, “emotion magnitude”, that captures the emotional undercurrents of the market. When integrated with traditional time series analysis using Temporal Convolutional Networks applied to stock market futures, this metric offers a more holistic understanding of market dynamics. In our experiments, incorporating it as a feature led to significantly better performance on both the training and validation sets (9.26%, 52.11%) compared to traditional market-based risk measures, in predicting futures market trends based on the commodities and supply chains analyzed. Second, we deploy a multidimensional data science framework that synthesizes disparate data streams and analyses. This includes stock metrics of sector-leading companies, the time horizon of significant market events identified based on company stock data, and the extraction of further knowledge concepts identified through “emotion magnitude” analysis. Our approach stitches together countries, commodities, and supply chains identified in the targeted news search and identifies the domestic companies impacted based on the time horizon of these emotional supply chain events. This methodology culminates in a unified knowledge graph that not only highlights the relationships between supply chain disruptions, affected corporations, and commodities but also quantifies the broader systemic implications of such market events that are revealed. Collectively, these innovations form a robust analytical tool for financial risk strategy, empowering stakeholders to navigate an ever-evolving financial global ecosystem with enhanced insights. This graph encapsulates multi-dimensional forces and enables stakeholders to anticipate and understand the broader causal implications of related supply chain and market events (such as economic sanctions’ impact on the energy, technology, and telecommunication sectors).

Suggested Citation

  • Shawn McCarthy & Gita Alaghband, 2023. "The Emotion Magnitude Effect: Navigating Market Dynamics Amidst Supply Chain Events," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:490-:d:1284611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/12/490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/12/490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patton, Andrew J. & Ziegel, Johanna F. & Chen, Rui, 2019. "Dynamic semiparametric models for expected shortfall (and Value-at-Risk)," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(2), pages 388-413.
    2. Guy Burstein & Inon Zuckerman, 2023. "Deconstructing Risk Factors for Predicting Risk Assessment in Supply Chains Using Machine Learning," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qifa Xu & Lu Chen & Cuixia Jiang & Yezheng Liu, 2022. "Forecasting expected shortfall and value at risk with a joint elicitable mixed data sampling model," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 407-421, April.
    2. Dimitriadis, Timo & Schnaitmann, Julie, 2021. "Forecast encompassing tests for the expected shortfall," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 604-621.
    3. Gerlach, Richard & Wang, Chao, 2020. "Semi-parametric dynamic asymmetric Laplace models for tail risk forecasting, incorporating realized measures," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 489-506.
    4. Harvey, A., 2021. "Score-driven time series models," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2133, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    5. Maziar Sahamkhadam, 2021. "Dynamic copula-based expectile portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 209-223, May.
    6. Lööf, Hans & Sahamkhadam, Maziar & Stephan, Andreas, 2022. "Is Corporate Social Responsibility investing a free lunch? The relationship between ESG, tail risk, and upside potential of stocks before and during the COVID-19 crisis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    7. Takaaki Koike & Cathy W. S. Chen & Edward M. H. Lin, 2024. "Forecasting and Backtesting Gradient Allocations of Expected Shortfall," Papers 2401.11701, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    8. Timo Dimitriadis & Xiaochun Liu & Julie Schnaitmann, 2020. "Encompassing Tests for Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Multi-Step Forecasts based on Inference on the Boundary," Papers 2009.07341, arXiv.org.
    9. Leandro Maciel, 2021. "Cryptocurrencies value‐at‐risk and expected shortfall: Do regime‐switching volatility models improve forecasting?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4840-4855, July.
    10. Santos, Douglas G. & Candido, Osvaldo & Tófoli, Paula V., 2022. "Forecasting risk measures using intraday and overnight information," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Bruzda, Joanna, 2019. "Quantile smoothing in supply chain and logistics forecasting," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 122-139.
    12. Rehman, Mobeen Ur & Owusu Junior, Peterson & Ahmad, Nasir & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2022. "Time-varying risk analysis for commodity futures," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Jinyu Zhou & Jigao Yan & Dongya Cheng, 2024. "Strong consistency of tail value-at-risk estimator and corresponding general results under widely orthant dependent samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 3357-3394, August.
    14. Giampiero Gallo & Ostap Okhrin & Giuseppe Storti, 2024. "Dynamic tail risk forecasting: what do realized skewness and kurtosis add?," Papers 2409.13516, arXiv.org.
    15. Li, Chenxing & Zhang, Zehua & Zhao, Ran, 2024. "Volatility or higher moments: Which is more important in return density forecasts of stochastic volatility model?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    16. Chao Wang & Richard Gerlach, 2019. "Semi-parametric Realized Nonlinear Conditional Autoregressive Expectile and Expected Shortfall," Papers 1906.09961, arXiv.org.
    17. Sreekha Pullaykkodi & Rajesh H. Acharya, 2024. "The Effects of Overnight Events on Daytime Return: A Market Microstructure Analysis of Market Quality," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 31(3), pages 497-542, September.
    18. Giuseppe Storti & Chao Wang, 2023. "Modeling uncertainty in financial tail risk: A forecast combination and weighted quantile approach," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1648-1663, November.
    19. Alexander Arimond & Damian Borth & Andreas Hoepner & Michael Klawunn & Stefan Weisheit, 2020. "Neural Networks and Value at Risk," Papers 2005.01686, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    20. Chen, Cathy W.S. & Hsu, Hsiao-Yun & Watanabe, Toshiaki, 2023. "Tail risk forecasting of realized volatility CAViaR models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:490-:d:1284611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.