IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i10p466-d944468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Would You like to Work More Hours?—An Investigation on South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, 030018 Bucharest, Romania
    Department of Economics and Economic Policy, Economics I Doctoral School, Faculty of Theoretical and Applied Economics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Esra Karapınar Kocağ

    (Department of Social Service and Counselling, Gumushane University, Gumushane 29100, Turkey)

Abstract

To begin with, Sustainable Development Goals are of tremendous importance in all areas, being seen as vital aims in all domains, which makes them indispensable when it comes to addressing the particularities of the labour market these days. Subsequently, human resources occupy a distinctive and unique position when referring to the implications derived from targeting Sustainable Development Goals, especially in the context represented by the period specific to the COVID-19 pandemic and the international events that followed immediately after that. This study investigates the work motivation of individuals, and whether they would be willing to work more hours if they are paid. Motivation and attitudes towards working more hours might be affected by several factors, and they are important contributors to business performance. Not only business performance is to be affected, but this is also a part of Sustainable Development Goals where labour market conditions and productivity concerns are addressed, along with several other factors. Using the Quarterly Labour Force Survey from 2017 to 2022 that is conducted by Statistics South Africa, this study attempts to shed light on individual preferences for working more hours in the case of South Africa. Considering the dichotomous dependent variable, a binary response model is utilised to explore the determinants of such behaviour. Findings of the probit model reveal that socio-demographic factors such as gender, marital status, education level, and work experience are important indicators to explain this preference. More precisely, being female increases the likelihood of willingness to work more hours if paid by 1.1 percentage points, and being never married increases that probability by 2.7 percentage points. Within education categories, the highest coefficient in magnitude, having tertiary education decreases the probability of willingness to work more hours by 8.2 percentage points. As an important labour market indicator, one more year to commence working increases the probability of willingness to work more hours by 0.4 percentage points.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu & Esra Karapınar Kocağ, 2022. "Would You like to Work More Hours?—An Investigation on South Africa," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:466-:d:944468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/10/466/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/10/466/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabelle Desnoyers-James & Sara Calligaris & Flavio Calvino, 2019. "DynEmp and MultiProd: Metadata," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2019/03, OECD Publishing.
    2. Diane F. Frey & Gillian MacNaughton, 2016. "A Human Rights Lens on Full Employment and Decent Work in the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, June.
    3. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu & Gheorghe N. Popescu, 2019. "An Exploratory Study Based on a Questionnaire Concerning Green and Sustainable Finance, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Performance: Evidence from the Romanian Business Environment," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-79, October.
    4. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment: Does the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework for BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project) Put an End to Disputes Over The Recognition and Measurement of Intellectual Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Sarah Wild, 2018. "South Africa pushes science to improve daily life," Nature, Nature, vol. 561(7722), pages 158-159, September.
    6. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Business Performance: Limits and Challenges Imposed by the Implementation of Directive 2013/34/EU in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-31, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Almorza-Gomar & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll & Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu & Araceli Galiano-Coronil, 2022. "Evaluation of an Experience of Academic Happiness through Football at University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Irene Sotiropoulou, 2021. "Persistent Food Shortages in Venetian Crete: A First Hypothesis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Shuchih Ernest Chang & Hueimin Louis Luo & YiChian Chen, 2019. "Blockchain-Enabled Trade Finance Innovation: A Potential Paradigm Shift on Using Letter of Credit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Jana Kozáková & Mária Urbánová & Radovan Savov, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Extent of the Ethical Codes: Evidence from Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Egla Mansi & Eglantina Hysa & Mirela Panait & Marian Catalin Voica, 2020. "Poverty—A Challenge for Economic Development? Evidences from Western Balkan Countries and the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Zongning Wu & Hongbo Cai & Ruining Zhao & Ying Fan & Zengru Di & Jiang Zhang, 2020. "A Topological Analysis of Trade Distance: Evidence from the Gravity Model and Complex Flow Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Philip W. S. Newall & Dominic Cortis, 2021. "Are Sports Bettors Biased toward Longshots, Favorites, or Both? A Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, January.
    8. Michael Peneder & Catherine Prettner, 2021. "Entwicklung der Produktivität österreichischer Unternehmen von 2008 bis 2018. Auswertung von Mikrodaten für Österreich im Rahmen von Multiprod 2.0," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 67450, August.
    9. Maria Luisa Scalvedi & Laura Rossi, 2021. "Comprehensive Measurement of Italian Domestic Food Waste in a European Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Shih-Hsien Tseng & Tien Son Nguyen & Ruei-Ci Wang, 2021. "The Lie Algebraic Approach for Determining Pricing for Trade Account Options," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-9, January.
    11. Huiqin Li & Yujie Hui & Jingyan Pan, 2022. "Evolution and Influencing Factors of Social-Ecological System Vulnerability in the Wuling Mountains Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-27, September.
    12. Željko Kokot & Todor Marković & Sanjin Ivanović & Maja Meseldžija, 2020. "Whole-Farm Revenue Protection as a Factor of Economic Stability in Crop Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-11, August.
    13. Hakim Arif Rahman & Asfiah Nurul, 2024. "Fostering Ethical Business Practices: A Bibliometric Review of the Linkages of Organizational Culture, Environment, and Business Ethics," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 75-95.
    14. Ibrahim Kabir & Umar Gunu & Zainab Lawal Gwadabe, 2023. "Decent Work Environment and Work-Life Balance: Empirical Analysis of Banking Sector of Hostile Environments," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 297-312, June.
    15. Pradip Debnath & Hari Mohan Srivastava, 2021. "Optimal Returns in Indian Stock Market during Global Pandemic: A Comparative Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Abel Cadenillas & Ricardo Huamán-Aguilar, 2020. "The Optimal Control of Government Stabilization Funds," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Cătălin Peptan & Alina Georgiana Holt & Flavius Cristian Mărcău, 2023. "Influences of Recent Crises in the European Space on the Exercise of Certain Rights and Citizen Duties in Romania: A Sustainable Perspective Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Ali AlArjani & Md. Maniruzzaman Miah & Md. Sharif Uddin & Abu Hashan Md. Mashud & Hui-Ming Wee & Shib Sankar Sana & Hari Mohan Srivastava, 2021. "A Sustainable Economic Recycle Quantity Model for Imperfect Production System with Shortages," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, April.
    19. Anh Tuan Bui & Susan Lambert & Tung Duc Phung & Giao Reynolds, 2021. "The Impact of Business Obstacles on Firm Growth and Job Stability in East Asia and Pacific Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Daehyeon Park & Jiyeon Park & Doojin Ryu, 2020. "Volatility Spillovers between Equity and Green Bond Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:466-:d:944468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.