IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v6y2018i1p15-d129701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced Portfolio Performance Using a Momentum Approach to Annual Rebalancing

Author

Listed:
  • Michael D. Mattei

    (Rubel School of Business, Bellarmine University, 2001 Newburg Road, Louisville, KY 40205, USA)

Abstract

After diversification, periodic portfolio rebalancing has become one of the most widely practiced methods for reducing portfolio risk and enhancing returns. Most of the rebalancing strategies found in the literature are generally regarded as contrarian approaches to rebalancing. A recent article proposed a rebalancing approach that incorporates a momentum approach to rebalancing. The momentum approach had a better risk adjusted return than either the traditional approach or a Buy-and-Hold approach. This article identifies an improvement to the momentum approach and then examines the impact of transactions costs and taxes on the portfolio performance of four active rebalancing approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael D. Mattei, 2018. "Enhanced Portfolio Performance Using a Momentum Approach to Annual Rebalancing," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:15-:d:129701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/6/1/15/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/6/1/15/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hubert Dichtl & Wolfgang Drobetz & Martin Wambach, 2016. "Testing rebalancing strategies for stock-bond portfolios across different asset allocations," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(9), pages 772-788, February.
    2. Cheng, Pao Lun, 1971. "Efficient Portfolio Selections beyond the Markowitz Frontier," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(5), pages 1207-1234, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sherif, Mohamed & Chen, Jiaqi, 2019. "The quality of governance and momentum profits: International evidence," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chendi Ni & Yuying Li & Peter A. Forsyth, 2023. "Neural Network Approach to Portfolio Optimization with Leverage Constraints:a Case Study on High Inflation Investment," Papers 2304.05297, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    2. Nichanan Sakolvieng, 2024. "Optimizing Cryptocurrency Portfolios: A Comparative Study of Rebalancing Strategies," GATR Journals jfbr220, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    3. Peter A. Forsyth & Kenneth R. Vetzal & G. Westmacott, 2022. "Optimal performance of a tontine overlay subject to withdrawal constraints," Papers 2211.10509, arXiv.org.
    4. Michael Maxwell & Gary Vuuren, 2019. "Active Investment Strategies under Tracking Error Constraints," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 25(3), pages 309-322, August.
    5. Matthias Horn & Andreas Oehler, 2020. "Automated portfolio rebalancing: Automatic erosion of investment performance?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(6), pages 489-505, October.
    6. Martin Boďa & Mária Kanderová, 2020. "Performance of Six Sigma Rebalancing for Portfolios Mixing Polar Investment Styles," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(1), pages 139-155.
    7. Kartikay Gupta & Niladri Chatterjee, 2021. "Stocks Recommendation from Large Datasets Using Important Company and Economic Indicators," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 28(4), pages 667-689, December.
    8. Forsyth, Peter A., 2020. "Optimal dynamic asset allocation for DC plan accumulation/decumulation: Ambition-CVAR," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 230-245.
    9. van Staden, Pieter M. & Forsyth, Peter A. & Li, Yuying, 2024. "Across-time risk-aware strategies for outperforming a benchmark," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 776-800.
    10. Marc Chen & Mohammad Shirazi & Peter A. Forsyth & Yuying Li, 2023. "Machine Learning and Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation for Optimal Decumulation: a Comparison Study," Papers 2306.10582, arXiv.org.
    11. Li, Yuying & Forsyth, Peter A., 2019. "A data-driven neural network approach to optimal asset allocation for target based defined contribution pension plans," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 189-204.
    12. Pieter M. van Staden & Peter A. Forsyth & Yuying Li, 2023. "A parsimonious neural network approach to solve portfolio optimization problems without using dynamic programming," Papers 2303.08968, arXiv.org.
    13. Jean-Baptiste Hasse & Christelle Lecourt & Souhila Siagh, 2023. "Institutional Stock-Bond Portfolios Rebalancing and Financial Stability," AMSE Working Papers 2322, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    14. Forsyth, Peter A., 2022. "Short term decumulation strategies for underspending retirees," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 56-74.
    15. Peter A. Forsyth, 2020. "A Stochastic Control Approach to Defined Contribution Plan Decumulation: "The Nastiest, Hardest Problem in Finance"," Papers 2008.06598, arXiv.org.
    16. Peter A. Forsyth & Kenneth R. Vetzal, 2019. "Defined Contribution Pension Plans: Who Has Seen the Risk?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:15-:d:129701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.