IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2008.06598.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Stochastic Control Approach to Defined Contribution Plan Decumulation: "The Nastiest, Hardest Problem in Finance"

Author

Listed:
  • Peter A. Forsyth

Abstract

We pose the decumulation strategy for a Defined Contribution (DC) pension plan as a problem in optimal stochastic control. The controls are the withdrawal amounts and the asset allocation strategy. We impose maximum and minimum constraints on the withdrawal amounts, and impose no-shorting no-leverage constraints on the asset allocation strategy. Our objective function measures reward as the expected total withdrawals over the decumulation horizon, and risk is measured by Expected Shortfall (ES) at the end of the decumulation period. We solve the stochastic control problem numerically, based on a parametric model of market stochastic processes. We find that, compared to a fixed constant withdrawal strategy, with minimum withdrawal set to the constant withdrawal amount, the optimal strategy has a significantly higher expected average withdrawal, at the cost of a very small increase in ES risk. Tests on bootstrapped resampled historical market data indicate that this strategy is robust to parametric model misspecification.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter A. Forsyth, 2020. "A Stochastic Control Approach to Defined Contribution Plan Decumulation: "The Nastiest, Hardest Problem in Finance"," Papers 2008.06598, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2008.06598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.06598
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Vigna, 2014. "On efficiency of mean--variance based portfolio selection in defined contribution pension schemes," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 237-258, February.
    2. S. G. Kou, 2002. "A Jump-Diffusion Model for Option Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1086-1101, August.
    3. Dang, D.M. & Forsyth, P.A., 2016. "Better than pre-commitment mean-variance portfolio allocation strategies: A semi-self-financing Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 827-841.
    4. Menoncin, Francesco & Vigna, Elena, 2017. "Mean–variance target-based optimisation for defined contribution pension schemes in a stochastic framework," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 172-184.
    5. Van Staden, Pieter M. & Dang, Duy-Minh & Forsyth, Peter A., 2018. "Time-consistent mean–variance portfolio optimization: A numerical impulse control approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 9-28.
    6. Peijnenburg, Kim & Nijman, Theo & Werker, Bas J.M., 2016. "The annuity puzzle remains a puzzle," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 18-35.
    7. Hubert Dichtl & Wolfgang Drobetz & Martin Wambach, 2016. "Testing rebalancing strategies for stock-bond portfolios across different asset allocations," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(9), pages 772-788, February.
    8. Bonnie-Jeanne MacDonald & Bruce Jones & Richard Morrison & Robert Brown & Mary Hardy, 2013. "Research and Reality: A Literature Review on Drawing Down Retirement Financial Savings," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 181-215.
    9. Cecilia Mancini, 2009. "Non‐parametric Threshold Estimation for Models with Stochastic Diffusion Coefficient and Jumps," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(2), pages 270-296, June.
    10. Lin, Yijia & MacMinn, Richard D. & Tian, Ruilin, 2015. "De-risking defined benefit plans," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 52-65.
    11. Peter A. Forsyth & Kenneth R. Vetzal, 2019. "Optimal Asset Allocation for Retirement Saving: Deterministic Vs. Time Consistent Adaptive Strategies," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 1-37, January.
    12. S. G. Kou & Hui Wang, 2004. "Option Pricing Under a Double Exponential Jump Diffusion Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1178-1192, September.
    13. Forsyth, Peter A. & Vetzal, Kenneth R. & Westmacott, Graham, 2020. "Optimal Asset Allocation For Dc Pension Decumulation With A Variable Spending Rule," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 419-447, May.
    14. Peter A. Forsyth & Kenneth R. Vetzal & Graham Westmacott, 2019. "Management of Portfolio Depletion Risk through Optimal Life Cycle Asset Allocation," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 447-468, July.
    15. Dimitris Politis & Halbert White, 2004. "Automatic Block-Length Selection for the Dependent Bootstrap," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 53-70.
    16. Forsyth, Peter A., 2020. "Optimal dynamic asset allocation for DC plan accumulation/decumulation: Ambition-CVAR," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 230-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Forsyth, Peter A., 2020. "Optimal dynamic asset allocation for DC plan accumulation/decumulation: Ambition-CVAR," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 230-245.
    2. Peter A. Forsyth & Kenneth R. Vetzal & G. Westmacott, 2022. "Optimal performance of a tontine overlay subject to withdrawal constraints," Papers 2211.10509, arXiv.org.
    3. Forsyth, Peter A., 2022. "Short term decumulation strategies for underspending retirees," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 56-74.
    4. Peter A. Forsyth & Kenneth R. Vetzal & Graham Westmacott, 2021. "Optimal control of the decumulation of a retirement portfolio with variable spending and dynamic asset allocation," Papers 2101.02760, arXiv.org.
    5. Marc Chen & Mohammad Shirazi & Peter A. Forsyth & Yuying Li, 2023. "Machine Learning and Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation for Optimal Decumulation: a Comparison Study," Papers 2306.10582, arXiv.org.
    6. Chendi Ni & Yuying Li & Peter A. Forsyth, 2023. "Neural Network Approach to Portfolio Optimization with Leverage Constraints:a Case Study on High Inflation Investment," Papers 2304.05297, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    7. Li, Yuying & Forsyth, Peter A., 2019. "A data-driven neural network approach to optimal asset allocation for target based defined contribution pension plans," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 189-204.
    8. Peter A. Forsyth & Kenneth R. Vetzal, 2019. "Defined Contribution Pension Plans: Who Has Seen the Risk?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, April.
    9. Zhang, Hanwen & Dang, Duy-Minh, 2024. "A monotone numerical integration method for mean–variance portfolio optimization under jump-diffusion models," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 112-140.
    10. Hanwen Zhang & Duy-Minh Dang, 2023. "A monotone numerical integration method for mean-variance portfolio optimization under jump-diffusion models," Papers 2309.05977, arXiv.org.
    11. Chendi Ni & Yuying Li & Peter Forsyth & Ray Carroll, 2020. "Optimal Asset Allocation For Outperforming A Stochastic Benchmark Target," Papers 2006.15384, arXiv.org.
    12. Pieter M. van Staden & Peter A. Forsyth & Yuying Li, 2023. "A parsimonious neural network approach to solve portfolio optimization problems without using dynamic programming," Papers 2303.08968, arXiv.org.
    13. van Staden, Pieter M. & Dang, Duy-Minh & Forsyth, Peter A., 2021. "The surprising robustness of dynamic Mean-Variance portfolio optimization to model misspecification errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 774-792.
    14. van Staden, Pieter M. & Forsyth, Peter A. & Li, Yuying, 2024. "Across-time risk-aware strategies for outperforming a benchmark," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 776-800.
    15. Peter A. Forsyth & Kenneth R. Vetzal, 2017. "Dynamic mean variance asset allocation: Tests for robustness," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(02n03), pages 1-37, June.
    16. Van Staden, Pieter M. & Dang, Duy-Minh & Forsyth, Peter A., 2018. "Time-consistent mean–variance portfolio optimization: A numerical impulse control approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 9-28.
    17. Peter A. Forsyth & George Labahn, 2017. "$\epsilon$-Monotone Fourier Methods for Optimal Stochastic Control in Finance," Papers 1710.08450, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2018.
    18. Liu, Lily Y. & Patton, Andrew J. & Sheppard, Kevin, 2015. "Does anything beat 5-minute RV? A comparison of realized measures across multiple asset classes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 293-311.
    19. Boris Ter-Avanesov & Homayoon Beigi, 2024. "MLP, XGBoost, KAN, TDNN, and LSTM-GRU Hybrid RNN with Attention for SPX and NDX European Call Option Pricing," Papers 2409.06724, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    20. Gapeev, Pavel V., 2006. "On maximal inequalities for some jump processes," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2006-060, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2008.06598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.