IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i2p291-d1592342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Access to Interpretable Data to Support Disproportionate Health Risks from Industrial Releases: A Case Study on the Environmental Protection Agency’s Datasets and Their Application to the Latinx Communities of Houston, Texas

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Wheless

    (Gallatin School of Individualized Study, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA)

  • Lori A. Hoepner

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA)

Abstract

Latinx communities face disproportionate environmental injustices and are targeted due to systematic economic and political inequities. This research evaluates the ease at which links between industrial releases and risk of adverse health effects can be defined to influence policy change in Houston, TX. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) is the most comprehensive public database on industrial facilities’ toxic chemical releases in the US. TRI is presented within a risk-based context through the Risk Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) scores. TRI and RSEI datasets for Houston in 2022 were assessed in QGIS to analyze chemical release and risk in neighborhoods using Community Tabulation Areas (CTAs), identifying demographics of communities facing disproportionate industrial releases and consequent potential health risks. Geospatial visualizations reflected Latinx communities to house the heaviest polluting industrial facilities in Houston. As a result, these communities face the highest potential risk of adverse health effects due to exposure to a multitude of chemicals—particularly 1,3-butadiene, benzene, and chromium—as reflected in cumulative RSEI scores. An analysis of TRI and RSEI datasets elucidates the burden of gathering and analyzing chemical release data in a public health context, reflecting why change beginning at the local level can be difficult for under-resourced Latinx communities facing industrial pollution. Improving the accessibility and utility of the EPA resources will provide a resource to advocate for data-driven policy change.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Wheless & Lori A. Hoepner, 2025. "Access to Interpretable Data to Support Disproportionate Health Risks from Industrial Releases: A Case Study on the Environmental Protection Agency’s Datasets and Their Application to the Latinx Commu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(2), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:291-:d:1592342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/291/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/291/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc D. Shapiro, 2005. "Equity and information: Information regulation, environmental justice, and risks from toxic chemicals," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 373-398.
    2. Lois Gibbs, 2002. "Citizen Activism for Environmental Health: The Growth of a Powerful New Grassroots Health Movement," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 584(1), pages 97-109, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arturs Kalnins & Glen Dowell, 2017. "Community Characteristics and Changes in Toxic Chemical Releases: Does Information Disclosure Affect Environmental Injustice?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 277-292, October.
    2. Meredith Fowlie & Stephen P. Holland & Erin T. Mansur, 2012. "What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California's NOx Trading Program," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(2), pages 965-993, April.
    3. Hyunhoe Bae & Peter Wilcoxen & David Popp, 2010. "Information disclosure policy: Do state data processing efforts help more than the information disclosure itself?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 163-182.
    4. Chakraborti, Lopamudra & Shimshack, Jay P., 2022. "Environmental disparities in urban Mexico: Evidence from toxic water pollution," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Matisoff, Daniel C., 2013. "Different rays of sunlight: Understanding information disclosure and carbon transparency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 579-592.
    6. Mah, Daphne Ngar-yin & Cheung, Darren Man-wai & Leung, Michael K.H. & Wang, Maggie Yachao & Wong, Mandy Wai-ming & Lo, Kevin & Cheung, Altair T.F., 2021. "Policy mixes and the policy learning process of energy transitions: Insights from the feed-in tariff policy and urban community solar in Hong Kong," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Michael W. Toffel, 2008. "Coerced Confessions: Self-Policing in the Shadow of the Regulator," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 45-71, May.
    8. Xiaoyang Li & Yue Maggie Zhou, 2016. "Offshoring Pollution While Offshoring Production," Working Papers 16-09r, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    9. Carrieri, Vincenzo & Principe, Francesco, 2022. "WHO and for how long? An empirical analysis of the consumers’ response to red meat warning," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Linda Waldman & Ramila Bisht & Rajashree Saharia & Abhinav Kapoor & Bushra Rizvi & Yasir Hamid & Meghana Arora & Ima Chopra & Kumud T. Sawansi & Ritu Priya & Fiona Marshall, 2017. "Peri-Urbanism in Globalizing India: A Study of Pollution, Health and Community Awareness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Vajjhala, Shalini & Van Epps, Amanda & Szambelan, Sarah, 2008. "Integrating EJ into Federal Policies and Programs: Examining the Role of Regulatory Impact Analyses and Environmental Impact Statements," RFF Working Paper Series dp-08-45, Resources for the Future.
    12. Finger, Stephen R. & Gamper-Rabindran, Shanti, 2013. "Mandatory disclosure of plant emissions into the environment and worker chemical exposure inside plants," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 124-136.
    13. Lori S. Bennear, 2008. "What do we really know? The effect of reporting thresholds on inferences using environmental right‐to‐know data," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 293-315, September.
    14. Mark Braun & Sofia B. Villas‐Boas, 2024. "Pollution and fatal traffic accidents in California counties," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(1), pages 360-385, March.
    15. Glen Dowell & Thomas Lyon, 2024. "Beliefs Matter: Local Climate Concerns and Industrial Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 609-632, October.
    16. Hyunhoe Bae, 2012. "Reducing Environmental Risks by Information Disclosure: Evidence in Residential Lead Paint Disclosure Rule," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 404-431, March.
    17. Amanda Pavan & Sue C. Grady & Igor Vojnovic, 2023. "Racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to risk-screening environmental indicator (RSEI) toxicity-weighted concentrations: Michigan Census Tracts, 2008–2017," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(2), pages 221-239, June.
    18. Xiaoyang Li & Yue M. Zhou, 2017. "Offshoring Pollution while Offshoring Production?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 2310-2329, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:291-:d:1592342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.