IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i9p1218-d1479457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Importance of Prefabrication to Easing Construction Workers’ Experience of Mental Health Stressors

Author

Listed:
  • Rasaki Kolawole Fagbenro

    (School of Built Environment, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Riza Yosia Sunindijo

    (School of Built Environment, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Chethana Illankoon

    (School of Built Environment, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Samuel Frimpong

    (School of Built Environment, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

Construction is widely acknowledged for its socioeconomic contributions, although it is also always considered as a dangerous and incident-prone industry. As a new method of working, prefabrication presents better work environments and other benefits that can potentially improve the safety and mental health of construction workers. This study compares the extent of stressors in traditional and prefabricated construction. Eighty-four construction site and factory-based workers in Australia were surveyed. Prefabricated construction respondents reported less experience of industry-related, management/organisational, and personal stressors. Specifically, the stressors found to be weakened by prefabrication were mental fatigue, work injuries, poor working conditions, unfavourable shift rosters, work overload, and poor work–life balance. Furthermore, the degree of the experience of potential mental health improvement factors such as labour effort efficiency, reduced on-site trade overlap, increased mechanised construction, and less dependence on weather conditions, among others, was significantly higher in prefabrication than in traditional construction. The influence of prefabrication on measures of poor and positive mental health is recommended for further studies, particularly by finding its links with the different groups of construction workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasaki Kolawole Fagbenro & Riza Yosia Sunindijo & Chethana Illankoon & Samuel Frimpong, 2024. "Importance of Prefabrication to Easing Construction Workers’ Experience of Mental Health Stressors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1218-:d:1479457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1218/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1218/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Blismas & Christine Pasquire & Alistair Gibb, 2006. "Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 121-130.
    2. Tania L. King & Philip J. Batterham & Helen Lingard & Jorgen Gullestrup & Chris Lockwood & Samuel B. Harvey & Brian Kelly & Anthony D. LaMontagne & Allison Milner, 2019. "Are Young Men Getting the Message? Age Differences in Suicide Prevention Literacy among Male Construction Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Paul Goodrum & Manish Gangwar, 2004. "The relationship between changes in equipment technology and wages in the US construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 291-301.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victoria Ross & Neil Caton & Sharna Mathieu & Jorgen Gullestrup & Kairi Kõlves, 2020. "Evaluation of a Suicide Prevention Program for the Energy Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Christopher M. Doran & Lisa Wittenhagen & Edward Heffernan & Carla Meurk, 2021. "The MATES Case Management Model: Presenting Problems and Referral Pathways for a Novel Peer-Led Approach to Addressing Suicide in the Construction Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Patrick Dallasega & Erwin Rauch, 2017. "Sustainable Construction Supply Chains through Synchronized Production Planning and Control in Engineer-to-Order Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Truong Dang Hoang Nhat Nguyen & Hyosoo Moon & Yonghan Ahn, 2022. "Critical Review of Trends in Modular Integrated Construction Research with a Focus on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Yu, Sisi & Liu, Yanfeng & Wang, Dengjia & Bahaj, AbuBakr S. & Wu, Yue & Liu, Jiaping, 2021. "Review of thermal and environmental performance of prefabricated buildings: Implications to emission reductions in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. Ravijanya Chippagiri & Ana Bras & Deepak Sharma & Rahul V. Ralegaonkar, 2022. "Technological and Sustainable Perception on the Advancements of Prefabrication in Construction Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Seoyoung Jung & Seulki Lee & Jungho Yu, 2021. "Identification and Prioritization of Critical Success Factors for Off-Site Construction Using ISM and MICMAC Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Kerry Anne London & Tanya Meade & Craig McLachlan, 2022. "Healthier Construction: Conceptualising Transformation of Mental Health Outcomes through an Integrated Supply Chain Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, August.
    9. Johan Larsson & Per Erik Eriksson & Thomas Olofsson & Peter Simonsson, 2014. "Industrialized construction in the Swedish infrastructure sector: core elements and barriers," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 83-96, February.
    10. Yasuhiro Kotera & Muhammad Aledeh & Annabel Rushforth & Nelly Otoo & Rory Colman & Elaina Taylor, 2022. "A Shorter Form of the Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Construction and Factorial Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, October.
    11. Yongsheng Jiang & Dong Zhao & Dedong Wang & Yudong Xing, 2019. "Sustainable Performance of Buildings through Modular Prefabrication in the Construction Phase: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Ornella Iuorio & Andrew Wallace & Kate Simpson, 2019. "Prefabs in the North of England: Technological, Environmental and Social Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Qianqian Shi & Jianbo Zhu & Marcel Hertogh & Zhaohan Sheng, 2018. "Incentive Mechanism of Prefabrication in Mega Projects with Reputational Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Kamali, Mohammad & Hewage, Kasun, 2016. "Life cycle performance of modular buildings: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1171-1183.
    15. Hong Xue & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su & Zezhou Wu, 2017. "Factors Affecting the Capital Cost of Prefabrication—A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Longhui Liao & Evelyn Ai Lin Teo & Ruidong Chang & Xianbo Zhao, 2020. "Diffusion of Building Information Modeling in Building Projects and Firms in Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    17. Jingyuan Shi & Jiaqing Sun, 2023. "Prefabrication Implementation Potential Evaluation in Rural Housing Based on Entropy Weighted TOPSIS Model: A Case Study of Counties in Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1218-:d:1479457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.