IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3573-d1071810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too Committed to Switch Off—Capturing and Organizing the Full Range of Work-Related Rumination from Detachment to Overcommitment

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Weigelt

    (Wilhelm Wundt Institute of Psychology, Leipzig University, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany)

  • J. Charlotte Seidel

    (Wilhelm Wundt Institute of Psychology, Leipzig University, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Lucy Erber

    (Wilhelm Wundt Institute of Psychology, Leipzig University, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Johannes Wendsche

    (Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Section 3 Work and Health, D-01099 Dresden, Germany)

  • Yasemin Z. Varol

    (Educational Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, D-60629 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Gerald M. Weiher

    (Educational Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, D-60629 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Petra Gierer

    (Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Hagen, D-58084 Hagen, Germany)

  • Claudia Sciannimanica

    (Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Hagen, D-58084 Hagen, Germany)

  • Richard Janzen

    (Wilhelm Wundt Institute of Psychology, Leipzig University, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Christine J. Syrek

    (Business Psychology, University of Applied Sciences Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, D-53359 Rheinbach, Germany)

Abstract

Work-related thoughts during off-job time have been studied extensively in occupational health psychology and related fields. We provide a focused review of the research on overcommitment—a component within the effort–reward imbalance model—and aim to connect this line of research to the most commonly studied aspects of work-related rumination. Drawing on this integrative review, we analyze survey data on ten facets of work-related rumination, namely (1) overcommitment, (2) psychological detachment, (3) affective rumination, (4) problem-solving pondering, (5) positive work reflection, (6) negative work reflection, (7) distraction, (8) cognitive irritation, (9) emotional irritation, and (10) inability to recover. First, we apply exploratory factor analysis to self-reported survey data from 357 employees to calibrate overcommitment items and to position overcommitment within the nomological net of work-related rumination constructs. Second, we apply confirmatory factor analysis to self-reported survey data from 388 employees to provide a more specific test of uniqueness vs. overlap among these constructs. Third, we apply relative weight analyses to assess the unique criterion-related validity of each work-related rumination facet regarding (1) physical fatigue, (2) cognitive fatigue, (3) emotional fatigue, (4) burnout, (5) psychosomatic complaints, and (6) satisfaction with life. Our results suggest that several measures of work-related rumination (e.g., overcommitment and cognitive irritation) can be used interchangeably. Emotional irritation and affective rumination emerge as the strongest unique predictors of fatigue, burnout, psychosomatic complaints, and satisfaction with life. Our study is intended to assist researchers in making informed decisions on selecting scales for their research and paves the way for integrating research on the effort–reward imbalance into work-related rumination.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Weigelt & J. Charlotte Seidel & Lucy Erber & Johannes Wendsche & Yasemin Z. Varol & Gerald M. Weiher & Petra Gierer & Claudia Sciannimanica & Richard Janzen & Christine J. Syrek, 2023. "Too Committed to Switch Off—Capturing and Organizing the Full Range of Work-Related Rumination from Detachment to Overcommitment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-29, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3573-:d:1071810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3573/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3573/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorenzo Avanzi & Enrico Perinelli & Michela Vignoli & Nina M. Junker & Cristian Balducci, 2020. "Unravelling Work Drive: A Comparison between Workaholism and Overcommitment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. van Vegchel, Natasja & de Jonge, Jan & Bosma, Hans & Schaufeli, Wilmar, 2005. "Reviewing the effort-reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 1117-1131, March.
    3. Oliver Weigelt & Petra Gierer & Christine J. Syrek, 2019. "My Mind is Working Overtime—Towards an Integrative Perspective of Psychological Detachment, Work-Related Rumination, and Work Reflection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Siegrist, Johannes & Starke, Dagmar & Chandola, Tarani & Godin, Isabelle & Marmot, Michael & Niedhammer, Isabelle & Peter, Richard, 2004. "The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(8), pages 1483-1499, April.
    5. Reingard Seibt & Steffi Kreuzfeld, 2021. "Influence of Work-Related and Personal Characteristics on the Burnout Risk among Full- and Part-Time Teachers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Johannes Siegrist & Jian Li, 2016. "Associations of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Components of Work Stress with Health: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Effort-Reward Imbalance Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liebig, Stefan & Schupp, Jürgen, 2008. "Leistungs- oder Bedarfsgerechtigkeit? Über einen normativen Zielkonflikt des Wohlfahrtsstaats und seiner Bedeutung für die Bewertung des eigenen Erwerbseinkommens," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 7-30.
    2. Keisuke Kokubun, 2024. "Effort–Reward Imbalance and Passion Exploitation: A Narrative Review and a New Perspective," World, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Yi-Shih Chung & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Jeong-Kwan Lee, 2017. "Burnout in seafarers: its antecedents and effects on incidents at sea," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(7), pages 916-931, October.
    4. Jing Liao & Eric J Brunner & Meena Kumari, 2013. "Is There an Association between Work Stress and Diurnal Cortisol Patterns? Findings from the Whitehall II Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Sperlich, Stefanie & Geyer, Siegfried, 2015. "The mediating effect of effort-reward imbalance in household and family work on the relationship between education and women's health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 58-65.
    6. Cristian Balducci & Paola Spagnoli & Malissa Clark, 2020. "Advancing Workaholism Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-4, December.
    7. Braunheim, Lisa & Dragano, Nico & Khachatryan, Kristine & Beutel, Manfred E. & Brähler, Elmar, 2024. "The effects of effort-reward imbalance on the job, overcommitment, and income on life satisfaction in Germany from a longitudinal perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    8. Reingard Seibt & Steffi Kreuzfeld, 2021. "Influence of Work-Related and Personal Characteristics on the Burnout Risk among Full- and Part-Time Teachers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Rupkatha Bardhan & Karen Heaton & Melissa Davis & Peter Chen & Dale A. Dickinson & Claudiu T. Lungu, 2019. "A Cross Sectional Study Evaluating Psychosocial Job Stress and Health Risk in Emergency Department Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Jolivet, Anne & Caroly, Sandrine & Ehlinger, Virgine & Kelly-Irving, Michelle & Delpierre, Cyrille & Balducci, Franck & Sobaszek, Annie & De Gaudemaris, Régis & Lang, Thierry, 2010. "Linking hospital workers' organisational work environment to depressive symptoms: A mediating effect of effort-reward imbalance? The ORSOSA study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 534-540, August.
    11. Chang-Lan Xia & Tung-Ju Wu & An-Pin Wei & Pei-Guan Wu, 2020. "Are Chinese Entrepreneurs Happier than Employees? Evidence Based on a National Workforce Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Nicola Magnavita & Carlo Chiorri, 2022. "Development and Validation of a New Measure of Work Annoyance Using a Psychometric Network Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Mario Schnalzenberger & Nicole Schneeweis & Rudolf Winter-Ebmer & Martina Zweimüller, 2014. "Job Quality and Employment of Older People in Europe," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 28(2), pages 141-162, June.
    14. Shimazu, Akihito & de Jonge, Jan, 2009. "Reciprocal relations between effort-reward imbalance at work and adverse health: A three-wave panel survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 60-68, January.
    15. Tânia Maria de Araújo & Johannes Siegrist & Arlinda B. Moreno & Maria de Jesus Mendes da Fonseca & Sandhi M. Barreto & Dóra Chor & Rosane Härter Griep, 2019. "Effort-Reward Imbalance, Over-Commitment and Depressive Episodes at Work: Evidence from the ELSA-Brasil Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Jia Ryu & Yeogyeong Yoon & Hyunjoo Kim & Chung Won Kang & Kyunghee Jung-Choi, 2018. "The Change of Self-Rated Health According to Working Hours for Two Years by Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, September.
    17. José Ignacio Cuitún Coronado & Tarani Chandola & Andrew Steptoe, 2018. "Allostatic Load and Effort-Reward Imbalance: Associations over the Working-Career," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Lin, Chieh-Peng & Tsai, Yuan-Hui & Liu, Min-Ling, 2016. "Something good and something bad in R&D teams: Effects of social identification and dysfunctional behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 191-199.
    19. Liza Jachens & Jonathan Houdmont, 2019. "Effort-Reward Imbalance and Job Strain: A Composite Indicator Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-9, October.
    20. Michael Gast & Janina Lehmann & Elena Schwarz & Christian Hirning & Michael Hoelzer & Harald Guendel & Elisabeth Maria Balint, 2022. "A Single-Day Training for Managers Reduces Cognitive Stigma Regarding Mental Health Problems: A Randomized Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3573-:d:1071810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.