IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1271-d1031399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bibliometric Analysis Reveals the Progress of PM 2.5 in Health Research, Especially in Cancer Research

Author

Listed:
  • Yaxuan Xie

    (School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Kejian Shi

    (School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Yuncong Yuan

    (College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Meijia Gu

    (Key Laboratory of Combinatorial Biosynthesis and Drug Discovery, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Shihan Zhang

    (School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Kai Wang

    (School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Liangying Fu

    (School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Chao Shen

    (College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Zhanpeng Yuan

    (School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China
    Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Toxicology, D1 Safety Assessment Center, Bio-City Innovation Park, Wuhan 430000, China)

Abstract

PM 2.5 has an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to 2.5 microns due to its inherent physical and chemical properties so that it can enter the alveoli through the respiratory tract for blood gas exchange. Numerous studies have shown that PM 2.5 is a serious air pollutant that poses a wide range of health risks, especially for cancer. Bibliometric methods were employed to have comprehensively analyzed the research of PM 2.5 in cancer for about a decade in Web of Science to identify hotspots and trends using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R. The field has undergone overall growth in the past decade. As research on PM 2.5 in health deepens, cancer related to it expanded beyond the respiratory system to the digestive system, urinary system, female gonadal axis, breast cancer and other cancers. Another observation is that research on PM 2.5 in cancer has progressed in the mechanisms of deterioration, such as the role of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer. In addition, research on the risks of PM 2.5 in combination with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals has also emerged. Results showed that there are relatively more studies on PM 2.5 in high-latitude countries, which may be due to different national conditions, such as climate and coal combustion. Our research has combed through the progress of PM 2.5 in cancer research and provided a supplement for developing pollution prevention ideas with different national conditions in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaxuan Xie & Kejian Shi & Yuncong Yuan & Meijia Gu & Shihan Zhang & Kai Wang & Liangying Fu & Chao Shen & Zhanpeng Yuan, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis Reveals the Progress of PM 2.5 in Health Research, Especially in Cancer Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1271-:d:1031399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prakash Thangavel & Duckshin Park & Young-Chul Lee, 2022. "Recent Insights into Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 )-Mediated Toxicity in Humans: An Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Abramo, Giovanni & Cicero, Tindaro & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2011. "A field-standardized application of DEA to national-scale research assessment of universities," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 618-628.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdi Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2020. "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 53-99, October.
    2. Mario Coccia & Greta Falavigna & Alessandro Manello, 2015. "The impact of hybrid public and market-oriented financing mechanisms on the scientific portfolio and performances of public research labs: a scientometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 151-168, January.
    3. I Gede Nyoman Mindra Jaya & Henk Folmer, 2024. "High-Resolution Spatiotemporal Forecasting with Missing Observations Including an Application to Daily Particulate Matter 2.5 Concentrations in Jakarta Province, Indonesia," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-29, September.
    4. Meshach Tang & Taghi Miri & Fakhteh Soltani & Helen Onyeaka & Zainab T. Al-Sharify, 2024. "Life Cycle Assessment of Plant-Based vs. Beef Burgers: A Case Study in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Juan Sebastian Pino & Pedro Nel Alvarado & Winston Rojas & Karen Cacua & Natalia Gomez-Lopera, 2024. "Assessment of Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity Induced by Diesel Exhaust Particles (DEPs) on Cell Line A549 and the Potential Role of Amide-Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes as Fuel Additive," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-29, September.
    6. Martina Cattaneo & Carlota Tayà & Laura Burgos & Lluis Morey & Joan Noguerol & Giorgio Provolo & Míriam Cerrillo & August Bonmatí, 2023. "Assessing Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Livestock Manure Storage: Comparison of Measurements with Dynamic and Static Chambers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Wuzhao Xue & Hua Li & Rizwan Ali & Ramiz ur Rehman & Gonzalo Fernández-Sánchez, 2021. "Assessing the Static and Dynamic Efficiency of Scientific Research of HEIs China: Three Stage DEA–Malmquist Index Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Zhihui Zhang & Ying Cheng & Nian Cai Liu, 2015. "Improving the normalization effect of mean-based method from the perspective of optimization: optimization-based linear methods and their performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 587-607, January.
    9. Abramo, Giovanni & Cicero, Tindaro & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2012. "A sensitivity analysis of research institutions’ productivity rankings to the time of citation observation," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 298-306.
    10. Abramo, Giovanni & Cicero, Tindaro & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2014. "Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 89-97.
    11. Mushtaq Ahmad & Jing Chen & Qing Yu & Muhammad Tariq Khan & Syed Weqas Ali & Asim Nawab & Worradorn Phairuang & Sirima Panyametheekul, 2023. "Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Environmentally Persistent Free Radicals (EPFRs) of PM 2.5 in Lahore, Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Yukun Shi & Duchun Wang & Zimeng Zhang, 2022. "Categorical Evaluation of Scientific Research Efficiency in Chinese Universities: Basic and Applied Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Bertoletti, Alice & Berbegal-Mirabent, Jasmina & Agasisti, Tommaso, 2022. "Higher education systems and regional economic development in Europe: A combined approach using econometric and machine learning methods," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    14. Silva, Haroldo José Torres da & Marques, Pedro Valentim, 2021. "Heterogeneity in the productivity of sugar-energy mills in Brazil," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(3), February.
    15. Xiong, Xi & Yang, Guo-liang & Guan, Zhong-cheng, 2018. "Assessing R&D efficiency using a two-stage dynamic DEA model: A case study of research institutes in the Chinese Academy of Sciences," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 784-805.
    16. Lee, Seonghee & Lee, Hakyeon, 2015. "Measuring and comparing the R&D performance of government research institutes: A bottom-up data envelopment analysis approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 942-953.
    17. Yang, Guo-liang & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Song, Yao-yao, 2018. "Measuring the inefficiency of Chinese research universities based on a two-stage network DEA model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 10-30.
    18. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Flavia Di Costa, 2014. "Variability of research performance across disciplines within universities in non-competitive higher education systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 777-795, February.
    19. Shuiqing Huang & Bo Yang & Sulan Yan & Ronald Rousseau, 2014. "Institution name disambiguation for research assessment," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(3), pages 823-838, June.
    20. Mutz, Rüdiger & Bornmann, Lutz & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2017. "Are there any frontiers of research performance? Efficiency measurement of funded research projects with the Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis for count data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 613-628.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1271-:d:1031399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.