IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i22p7071-d1281647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Brief Health Literacy Scale for Adults: Adaptation and Validation of the Health Literacy for School-Aged Children Questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Stinne Eika Rasmussen

    (Research Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
    Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark)

  • Anna Aaby

    (Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark)

  • Anne Søjbjerg

    (Research Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
    Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark)

  • Anna Mygind

    (Research Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark)

  • Helle Terkildsen Maindal

    (Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark)

  • Olli Paakkari

    (Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Research Centre for Health Promotion, University of Jyväskylä, Keskussairaalantie 4, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland)

  • Kaj Sparle Christensen

    (Research Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
    Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark)

Abstract

The Health Literacy for School-Aged Children (HLSAC) is a brief, generic instrument measuring health literacy among school-aged children. Given its brevity and broad conceptualization of health literacy, the HLSAC is a potentially valuable measuring instrument among adults as well. This validation study aimed to adapt the HLSAC questionnaire to an adult population through assessment of content validity and subsequently determine the structural validity of the adapted instrument, the Brief Health Literacy scale for Adults (B-HLA). The content validity of the HLSAC was assessed through interviews with respondents and experts, and the structural validity of the adapted instrument (B-HLA) was evaluated using Rasch analysis. The content validity assessment ( n = 25) gave rise to adjustments in the wording of five items. The B-HLA demonstrated an overall misfit to the Rasch model ( n = 290). Items 6 and 8 had the poorest individual fits. We found no signs of local dependency or differential item functioning concerning sex, age, education, and native language. The B-HLA demonstrated unidimensionality and ability to discriminate across health literacy levels (PSI = 0.80). Discarding items 6 or 8 resulted in an overall model fit and individual fit of all items. In conclusion, the B-HLA appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing health literacy among adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Stinne Eika Rasmussen & Anna Aaby & Anne Søjbjerg & Anna Mygind & Helle Terkildsen Maindal & Olli Paakkari & Kaj Sparle Christensen, 2023. "The Brief Health Literacy Scale for Adults: Adaptation and Validation of the Health Literacy for School-Aged Children Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:22:p:7071-:d:1281647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/22/7071/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/22/7071/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongyan Liu & Huan Zeng & Yang Shen & Fan Zhang & Manoj Sharma & Weiyun Lai & Yu Zhao & Genhui Tao & Jun Yuan & Yong Zhao, 2018. "Assessment Tools for Health Literacy among the General Population: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Veronica Velasco & Andrea Gragnano & Gruppo Regionale HBSC Lombardia 2018 & Luca Piero Vecchio, 2021. "Health Literacy Levels among Italian Students: Monitoring and Promotion at School," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Paul Rosenbaum, 1989. "Criterion-related construct validity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 625-633, September.
    4. David Andrich, 1978. "A rating formulation for ordered response categories," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 561-573, December.
    5. Karina Friis & Anna Aaby & Mathias Lasgaard & Marie Hauge Pedersen & Richard H. Osborne & Helle Terkildsen Maindal, 2020. "Low Health Literacy and Mortality in Individuals with Cardiovascular Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes, and Mental Illness: A 6-Year Population-Based Follow-Up Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Saulius Sukys & Laima Trinkuniene & Ilona Tilindiene, 2019. "Subjective Health Literacy among School-Aged Children: First Evidence from Lithuania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-11, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang, Hsin-Li & Yang, Cheng-Hua, 2008. "Explore airlines’ brand niches through measuring passengers’ repurchase motivation—an application of Rasch measurement," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 105-112.
    2. Ivana Bassi & Matteo Carzedda & Enrico Gori & Luca Iseppi, 2022. "Rasch analysis of consumer attitudes towards the mountain product label," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Wanke, Peter Fernandes & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel José & Moreira Antunes, Jorge Junio & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Roubaud, David & Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim & Santibanez Gonzalez‬, Erne, 2021. "An original information entropy-based quantitative evaluation model for low-carbon operations in an emerging market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    4. Hua-Hua Chang, 1996. "The asymptotic posterior normality of the latent trait for polytomous IRT models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 445-463, September.
    5. Curt Hagquist & Raili Välimaa & Nina Simonsen & Sakari Suominen, 2017. "Differential Item Functioning in Trend Analyses of Adolescent Mental Health – Illustrative Examples Using HBSC-Data from Finland," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 10(3), pages 673-691, September.
    6. Wang, Luming & Finn, Adam, 2014. "A psychometric theory that measures up to marketing reality: An adapted Many Faceted IRT model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 93-102.
    7. Huang, Jen-Hung & Peng, Kua-Hsin, 2012. "Fuzzy Rasch model in TOPSIS: A new approach for generating fuzzy numbers to assess the competitiveness of the tourism industries in Asian countries," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 456-465.
    8. Wendy L. Martin & Alexander McKelvie & G. T. Lumpkin, 2016. "Centralization and delegation practices in family versus non-family SMEs: a Rasch analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 755-769, October.
    9. Chang, Hsin-Li & Wu, Shun-Cheng, 2008. "Exploring the vehicle dependence behind mode choice: Evidence of motorcycle dependence in Taipei," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 307-320, February.
    10. Silvia Golia, 2015. "Assessing the impact of uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning items on Rasch measure: the polytomous case," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 441-461, June.
    11. Jesper Tijmstra & Maria Bolsinova, 2019. "Bayes Factors for Evaluating Latent Monotonicity in Polytomous Item Response Theory Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 846-869, September.
    12. Salzberger, Thomas & Koller, Monika, 2013. "Towards a new paradigm of measurement in marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1307-1317.
    13. Tetine Sentell & Sandra Vamos & Orkan Okan, 2020. "Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Health Literacy Research Around the World: More Important Than Ever in a Time of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Richard N McNeely & Salissou Moutari & Samuel Arba-Mosquera & Shwetabh Verma & Jonathan E Moore, 2018. "An alternative application of Rasch analysis to assess data from ophthalmic patient-reported outcome instruments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-32, June.
    15. Neida Neto Vicente Ramos & Inês Fronteira & Maria Rosário Oliveira Martins, 2022. "Building a Health Literacy Indicator from Angola Demographic and Health Survey in 2015/2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, March.
    16. Francesca DE BATTISTI & Giovanna NICOLINI & Silvia SALINI, 2008. "Methodological overview of Rasch model and application in customer satisfaction survey data," Departmental Working Papers 2008-04, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    17. Kuan-Yu Jin & Yi-Jhen Wu & Hui-Fang Chen, 2022. "A New Multiprocess IRT Model With Ideal Points for Likert-Type Items," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(3), pages 297-321, June.
    18. van der Ark, L. Andries, 2012. "New Developments in Mokken Scale Analysis in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i05).
    19. Piotr Tarka, 2013. "Model of latent profile factor analysis for ordered categorical data," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 14(1), pages 171-182, March.
    20. Xiaohui Zheng & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2007. "Estimating parameters of dichotomous and ordinal item response models with gllamm," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 7(3), pages 313-333, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:22:p:7071-:d:1281647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.